Preview

Policing and the Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1101 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Policing and the Constitution
PolMonique King
April 25, 2013
LP2 Assignment: Policing and the Constitution
Probable cause: sufficient reason based upon known facts to believe a crime has been committed or that certain property is connected with a crime. Probable cause must exist for a law enforcement officer to make an arrest without a warrant, search without a warrant, or seize property in the belief the items were evidence of a crime. Probable cause in my understanding means that a police officer cannot accuse you of a crime that they are not able to prove. If you are pulled over due to being suspected of drunk driving, they have to give you sobriety tests or see open containers in order to give you a ticket or take you into custody. They just can’t see you swerve while driving and take you to jail without proof.
Exclusionary rule: the rule that evidence secured by illegal means and in bad faith cannot be introduced in a criminal trial. The technical term is that it is "excluded" upon a motion to suppress made by the lawyer for the accused. It is based on the constitutional requirement that "…no [person] can be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" (Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, applied to the states by 14th Amendment). The breakdown of Exclusionary rule is that police officials are not able to raid your house and find drugs or illegal items and use them in the court of law against without obtaining a search warrant first. This also means that when they talk to you about the offenses that you are being obtained on, they have to let you know that it can be used in the court of law. I think the exclusionary rule is a good rule because I’m sure a lot of people have gotten off because evidence was received illegal just to try to bring someone down. This law helps respect every individual right in my opinion.
Fruit of the poisoned tree: any physical or verbal evidence police are able to acquire by using illegally obtained evidence is known as the fruit of



Cited: http://dictionary.law.com/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I am usually one of those people that believes in the law and that believes that rules are in place for a reason. I am well aware of the Exclusionary Rule and the Poisonous Fruit Doctrine however, these are two things that I don't believe in. According to the Exclusionary Rule, any evidence obtained without a warrant or Constitutional justification needs to be excluded from any case records. (FindLaw, 2017). While the Poisonous Fruit Doctrine indicates that the court may exclude not only the evidence itself that was seized in violation of the Constitution but also any other evidence that was derived from the illegal search. (FindLaw, 2017). This doctrine allows for many criminals to be set free on a technicality. We are all well aware that…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exclusionary rule is a term used to refer to the legal principle in the United Sates, which holds that evidence analyzed and collected in violation of a person's constitutional rights. It is sometimes admissible for the persecution of criminal in the court of law. To protect the constitutional rights, an exclusionary rule might be considered as an example of a prophylactic rule which is created by the Judiciary. In most cases, it is used to protect the constitutional rights of a person such as liberty of property, deprived of life, and right to worship any religion.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To protect the American peoples 4th Amendment right “against unreasonable searches and seizures” from law enforcement using illegally seized evidence in a criminal trial against them, the exclusionary rule was created. The U.S. Supreme Court deemed any evidence illegally obtained inadmissible in a criminal trial, and any other evidence obtained during an illegal search and seizure inadmissible as well. This is known as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exclusionary rule is a judicially created rule that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal prosecution (Sheb and Sheb 503). It became known in 1914 after a Supreme Court case Weeks vs United States. The Supreme Court ruled that the rule was rational because police cannot illegaly do searches and…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What the author intends to answer is what the exclusionary rule is and alternatives to the rule that potentially increase societal self-worth and positive reinforcement. This article explains to for the exclusionary rule, “it is a judge made rule of evidence, originated in 1914 by the Supreme Court in Weeks v. United States, which bars "the use of evidence secured through an illegal search and seizure.(Wilkey, 216)” What surprises the reader is finding out that the exclusionary rule is not a rule required by the constitution. It is through…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not one person can answer a question about the "exclusionary rule" until they know what is stated in the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule go hand in hand. The Fourth Amendment was put into the constitution to limit on the actions of overzealous officers (Peak, 2006). Then, one must understand what is meant by "probable cause." Armed with this information, we can discuss the definition of the exclusionary rule and some of its history. Also, we will list some of the advantages and disadvantages of the exclusionary rule and ask the question should it be abandoned.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Exclusionary Rule Analysis

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The exclusionary rule is a legal procedure in the United States, which falls under the constitution. It protects citizens of the country in making sure that law enforcement officers are operating lawfully and that they abide by all search and seizure laws. It goes so far to protect the citizens of The United States that if a law enforcement officer illegally obtains evidence it can and most likely will be thrown out of the court. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the exclusionary rule, exploring its fallacies…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Let’s begin with the definition of a search warrant. A search warrant is a judicial document that authorizes police officers the right to search an individual or a place to obtain evidence for presentation in a criminal prosecution. A search warrant is given to search people and/or private property in order to seize suspected evidence in a criminal or civil case. The fourth amendment of the constitution addresses the issues of search warrants rights and was designed to protect the rights of individuals from unlawful search and seizures. Search warrant laws indicate when a warrant is and is not required to search an individual and/or the property of an individual. The police officers who are wanting to do a search must obtain a search warrant by submitting affidavits and other evidence to a judge or magistrate to establish probable cause in order to believe a search will produce evidence related to a crime. Probable Cause is a level of reasonable belief that a crime has been or will be committed.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The difference between these two concepts is that probable cause implies there is solid confirmation of a crime, while reasonable suspicion is actually open to a broader interpretation. Indeed, reasonable suspicion shows that it gives the idea that a crime has occurred; the expression regularly is utilized to justify investigation concerning suspicious conduct when a crime may have occurred. Finally, the Probable cause must exist for the cops to be able to arrest people or obtain a search…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The exclusionary rule mandates courts to ban the introduction of evidence that is either incriminating or not that was obtained illegal. The exclusionary rule prevents evidence that was obtained by bad methods to be used in a court of law, no matter how incriminating the evidence is to the defendant. The bad methods refer to the actions of the investigators and the procedures that the investigators took while obtaining the evidence in question. There are five possible constitutional rights that the investigator could have violated that fall under the exclusionary rule. The first constitutional right is the Fourth amendment’s ban on unreasonable searches and seizures. The second and third constitutional rights are the Fifth Amendment’s ban on coerced incriminating statements and the Sixth amendments right to counsel. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee due process of law in administering identification procedures. Also most states have their own version of the exclusionary rule worked into their state constitutions or statues, some of which predate the Constitution…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Numerous individuals have a vast misconstruing on the variations between Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion. Why is it important for people to understand the differences between these two important concepts? Understanding the differences between the two is essential on the grounds that one will result in a lawful search and the alternative will cause an unlawful search and seizure. As a quick definition, according to the textbook, Probable Cause is a law enforcement officer’s belief that supported by evidences and circumstances, that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 205). Whereas, Reasonable Suspicion can be considered to be more of an inclination a law enforcement officer will get (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 237). Reasonable Suspicion is employed when conducting an investigative stop; conversely, Probably Cause is required to arrest or place a suspect into custody (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 237). An officer must have both Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion to conduct a stop and frisk. Officers are taught this during their time in…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cops that needed to get search warrants, but were unable to get them would be able to just go to that persons house and just search the place whenever they like and not get in trouble for it. Sure the exclusionary rule might seem hard at the moment and people that know that there can be evidence found in the criminals home are getting pissed off because the court did not issue a search and seizure warrant to find out the full truth about the criminal and put them away for a really long time. So, no I do not think that the exclusionary rule should be overturned and if I was appointed to the Supreme Court and had the option to do so I would not do…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Police Powers

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Bail means that after someone has been charged they are free from police custody until the next stage of the process of the case (trial). The custody officer has the power to either decide if bail is granted or not. If the officer refuses to grant bail they must present the case to magistrate court soon as possible.…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1914, during the Supreme Court case Weeks versus the United States, the exclusionary rule was established (Hendrie 1). The exclusionary rule was a part of the Fourth Amendment. It states that evidence found at a crime scene is not admissible if it was not found under the correct procedures. This means that the government cannot conduct illegal searches of a person or place and use evidence that is found at that time. The government must go through the procedures of obtaining warrants or have probable cause to search an individual or place. The exclusionary rule is used to provide civil rights for individuals and restricts powers of the local and federal government (Lynch 1).…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Defense Of Entrapment

    • 3337 Words
    • 14 Pages

    A more practical reason why the exclusionary rule is not good enough should be reason enough to discard such a rule. If a person was trapped in such gross unfairness, that he is innocent no doubt, but because he has been pressurized in such a way that he or she now believes that what he of she did was wrong, thus pleads guilty to that crime, the courts will have no option but to convict an innocent person. In this situation, the exclusionary rule cannot protect the accused, and an innocent person will be put away for no reason. For this reason, entrapment should be recognized as a…

    • 3337 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays