He was not proven to lie in his manuscripts until after 1830, long after both previous manuscripts had been published. Also he wrote a letter to the queen in 1816 explain what happened, this is when the story of John Smith and Pocahontas started to circulate. Pocahontas was in London with the queen with this story was spreading if she did not agree with it she could have put a stop to the rumors then. The last thing that I found to be very convincing was the theory about why Pocahontas was not mentioned in Smiths original manuscript. The settlements were still very new at this point and many settlers were still coming over from England. If Smith really had published that the Indians were savages, cruel, and incredibly violent the settlers would not have come over in such large numbers anymore because they would have been afraid of the natives. While the opposing side had a very convincing argument, I think Pocahontas did convinve her father to let John Smith
He was not proven to lie in his manuscripts until after 1830, long after both previous manuscripts had been published. Also he wrote a letter to the queen in 1816 explain what happened, this is when the story of John Smith and Pocahontas started to circulate. Pocahontas was in London with the queen with this story was spreading if she did not agree with it she could have put a stop to the rumors then. The last thing that I found to be very convincing was the theory about why Pocahontas was not mentioned in Smiths original manuscript. The settlements were still very new at this point and many settlers were still coming over from England. If Smith really had published that the Indians were savages, cruel, and incredibly violent the settlers would not have come over in such large numbers anymore because they would have been afraid of the natives. While the opposing side had a very convincing argument, I think Pocahontas did convinve her father to let John Smith