Preview

Plyler Vs. Doe Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
289 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plyler Vs. Doe Case Study
In 1982, there was a case in the state of Texas called Plyler vs. Doe. This was a case that the supreme court overturned . The case was denying funding for education to children who were illegal immigrants and also denied the school district's attempt to charge illegal immigrants a thousand dollar tuition fee for each student to repay for the lost state funding. The court found that where states limit the rights to people based on their status as aliens, this limitation must be examined.
Some revisions to education laws in Texas in 1975 didn’t allow state funding for educating children who illegally came into the U.S. and authorized local school districts to deny enrollment to these students. A majority vote of the supreme court found that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issue with this case is that does it violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Which in short says that no other state has the…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mendez v. Westminster (1946) was a case enacted by, “Gonzalo Mendez, William Guzman, Frank Palomino, Thomas Estrada, and Lorenzo Ramirez” who “filed suit on behalf of their fifteen…children and five thousand other minor children of ‘Mexican and Latin descent’” (Valencia, 2010, p.23). They sued Westminster school district because they were denying their children the right to enter schools near their home. The school was in California and was predominantly White and did not allow any Mexican American children to attend. Mendez claimed that the school was segregating his children, and others, based on race and kept them separate from the White Society. The “Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment played a key role in the Mendez case”…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plyler V. Doe Case Study

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plyler v. Doe was one of many legal cases we talked about over the course of this semester in our SEI class. This case was the most interesting to me and so I thought I would share my knoedlge on this court case. This court case was brought to the suprieme court where the defendant was Plyler and the plaintiff was Doe. The Doe family was of Mexican orgin and were from Texas. The definedants argued that undoumented children were not “persons” and this was very alarming to me! The state was denying all funding to children in grades k-12 who were immigrants while trying to charge these people a large tutition fee for each undocumentedd student. They were denying students of education becuase of their status. They wanted this to compisate for…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author begins her main argument with a brief history lesson, informing readers the events that have shaped our system today. Serrano v. Priest determined that using district property tax revenues as the primary source of funding for schools was unconstitutional, noting: “this disparity in available resources per student was deemed inequitable, and therefore, unconstitutional.” Lefkowits also denotes San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, in which the Supreme Court ruled that education and school taxation are state matters.…

    • 922 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    have sided with the state while many supreme court cases have sided with the rights of…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)- It established equal right to people who were both african-american and white.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leandro vs. The State of North Carolina had a huge impact on the state of North Carolina. It showed that good teachers, a good budget, and spotting early any problems a child may have are very important to the child's learning: In other words, the child's environment is essential. In 1997, the Supreme Court decided that every single kid in North Carolina should have "a sound, basic education," which the Supreme Court pretty much defines as a basic understanding in all fields of academics to compete with other children in the world for a good job.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, in the Power Point Slides in Module 14 regarding the case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954) states, “If a state provides education, it must provide it equally.” A segregated school is not equal to an unsegregated school. Furthermore, in Benedict (pg. 330), “…the ruling that government-enforced racial segregation in schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment…the Court ruled that any government-enforced segregation, whether in public or private facilities, was unconstitutional.”…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I watched the documentary called Fear and Learning at Hoover Elementary. The filmmaker named Laura Simon, was born in Mexico and her family immigrated to America when she was six. She began her career working for a non-profit organization that dealt with immigrant rights and education. Her personal odyssey and involvement with dilemmas of her students led her to the making of Fear and Learning at Hoover Elementary. During 1994, California voters sanctioned Proposition 187, which denies public education and health care to all undocumented immigrants.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lau vs.Nichols

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During its 1974/75 term the U.S. Supreme Court heard a case filed against the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in a class action suit brought by non-English speaking Chinese students against officials responsible for the operation of the San Francisco Unified School District. Certiorari[1] is an extraordinary judicial review in which the U.S. Supreme Court review cases of public importance. The primary issue of the case was whether the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment [to the U.S. Constitution, July 9, 1868[2]] apply to the students of the respondents’ school district and whether it can be interpreted in such way that the school system is responsible to assure that students of a particular race, color or national origin [in Lau v. Nichols non-English speaking Chinese students] cannot be denied the opportunity to obtain the same education that is generally obtained by other students in the system.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Tucson Unified School District Board elected to suspend the Mexican-American Studies Program to be in compliance with the state law Arizona statute ARS 15-112. This decision was also made to avoid losing ten percent of its budget in this period of a struggling economy; but that does not complete the story. The history of disagreement began when Tom Horne, the State Superintendent of Schools, during the last days of his term found Tucson School District in violation of all four provisions of the state law ARS 15-112. John Huppenthal, who took over as Superintendent of Schools followed up on the decision by ordering an audit of the program and concluded the same.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Bilingual Education Act, Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1968, was proclaimed as landmark legislation in defense of curriculum s for English language learner students. This federal law presented legal procedures and funding for transitional bilingual education programs. A sequence of federal court verdicts helped expand the opportunities and execution of Title VII (“The Aftermath,” 2011). The Supreme Court judgment in Lau v. Nichols in 1974 expected school districts to take steps to defend the civil rights of English language learners. From 1998 to 2008 initiatives really began to take shape for English language learners. In five different states voters were requested to come to a decision about educating policies that effect English language learners (Mora, 2009). Anti bilingual education vote proposal was passed in California in 1998, Arizona in 2000, and Massachusetts in 2002. However, the anti bilingual education was rejected in Colorado in 2002 and most recently in Oregon in 2008 (“The Importance of Our English Language,”…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Class Apart

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Latinos lawyers and activists realized that real change with Mexican Americans would only happen if they were recognized by the 14th Amendment. They would then have to bring a case to the Supreme Court. This is where the case of Hernandez vs. Texas becomes relevant in 1951.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hu references the case of Fisher vs. University of Texas, in which Abigail Fisher, a white student, was denied admission to the University of Texas. She brought the University of Texas to court based on the fact that she felt the rejection “violated the Equal Rights Protection of the 14th Amendment,” due to the fact that she felt it was a case of reverse discrimination. The district and appellate courts upheld the University’s decision and on February 21st 2012 the U.S Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. This case is currently ongoing with the U.S Supreme Court and no decision has yet been made.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brown v Board of Education when the court reached a decision to overturn segregation and ruled…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays