Preview

Plessy V. Ferguson

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
194 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plessy V. Ferguson
Before Plessy v. Ferguson, there were separate railway cars for white and colored people. Homer Plessy was convicted of sitting in a whites-only car. He had white parents, but since he had black ancestry he was considered black. He argued that the Louisiana’s Separate Car Act of 1890 violated the Thirteenth Amendment, which required all people to be treated equally under the law. Therefore, the Court upheld this act, however, Justice Henry Brown claims that the abolition of slavery did not prevent states from making legal distinctions between races (Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), page 511). Based on Document 4, Separate Accommodation states that railway companies carrying passengers, they shall provide equal but separated accommodations for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On November 5, 1983, defendants Elijah Anton Askov, Ralph Hussey, Samuel Gugliotta, and Edward Melo were charged with attempting to commit extortion against Peter Belmont. The following men Askov, Hussey, and Melo had existing charges on possession of weapons, pointing a firearm, and assault with a weapon. The defendants had been in business with Belmont for supplying exotic dancers to licensed premises. Belmont was offered to pay 50% commission to run a business with Melo and Gugliotta in the Toronto area. However, Belmont refused and contacted the police to file reports. On November 12th, Belmont and his bodyguard were approached by the defendants in a tavern which was under surveillance. Melo and Askov were arrested on scene. Hussey ran away but later turned himself in and was charged on November 14th. Gugliotta was arrested on November 30th. The defendants Melo, Hussey, Askov were denied bail and were placed in custody for 6 months. On May 7th, the three men were ordered to…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Under O.C.G.A. section 51-7-60 can Robin Kincaid recover damages from Barclay’s Department Store when (1) the stores antishoplifting device alarm was triggered; (2) the clerk failed to deactivate the shoplifting device; (3) the security guard touched Kincaid’s elbow (4) the security guard escorted Kincaid to the back of the store (5) Kincaid was embarrassed by the security guard’s actions (6) asked Kincaid to remain in the room; (7) when the security guard left for fifteen minutes; (8) the security guard took a phone call from his wife?…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smith V. Sate Case Study

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Answer: The hearsay rule prohibits statements made outside of court to be offered as proof, in admitting evidence. However there are exceptions to the hearsay rule, which includes statements made in 1) excitement utterance, this is defined as statements made while the declarant was under stress of excitement which caused it. 2) Present impression, statements made during or right after the declarant perceived it. 3) There are various records rules; such as public records which are marriage, death, and birth if reported to legal office, observations made while on public duty like how many times an officer has had disciplinary actions against him or her while on duty. Cases filed in courts prior…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri v McNeely

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Missouri police officer stopped Tyler McNeely after observing it exceeding the posted speed limit and repeatedly crossing the center line. The officer noticed McNeely’s bloodshot eyes, his slurred speech, and a smell of alcohol on his breath. McNeely performed poorly on a battery of field sobriety tests, and he declined to take a Breathalyzer test. When McNeely indicated he refuse a breath sample for testing, the officer took him to a nearby hospital for blood alcohol test. The officer explained to McNeely that under Missouri’s implied consent law, refusal to submit voluntarily to the blood test would lead to an immediate one-year suspension of his driver’s license and could be used against him in any future prosecution. The testing of the blood indicated that the blood alcohol level was significantly above the legal limit. McNeely had challenged the blood test evidence claiming that there should have been a search warrant before ordering a blood sample.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atlanta Motel Case Study

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The owner of a motel in Georgia, who only served (mostly travelling) white people, found it unconstitutional for congress to pass a law saying that private businesses couldn’t decide who to serve based on race. In the 1880’s, several civil rights cases had also questioned whether or not the government was constitutionally right or wrong for creating such a law. In the civil rights cases…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shenkley V. Tabuena

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Defendant Mark Schenkly detained Mr. Flynn in an unreasonable manner because he poked him in the back with a bat, called him names, and denied him access to water and to his phone.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Burr V. Allred

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    James Burr V. Allred was born on march 29 1899 in Bowie, Texas. Burr and V were the names of his uncles and he was known as Vee until he was older. While enlisting clerks did not want to type Allred's whole name so they dropped the Burr and the V was sometimes mistaken for a roman numeral, but Allred did not mind the change and continued to use the new name the rest of his life. His father was Renne and mother was Mary (Henson) Allred. He was one of nine children and had a strictly-disciplined home, by having a lot of sibling he learned to have patience and tolerance. What he learned in that home stood him in good stead throughout his career as a statesman. As a boy James also worked as a shoeshiner, soda pop bottler and newspaper boy and kept…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plessy vs. Ferguson

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The case of Plessy vs. Ferguson started when a 30-year-old colored shoemaker named Homer Plessy was put in jail for sitting in the white car of the East Louisiana Railroad on June 7, 1892. Even though Plessy was only one-eighths black and seven-eighths white, he was considered black by Louisiana law. Plessy didn't like this idea, and so he went to court and argued in the case of Homer Adolph Plessy v. The State of Lousiana that the Separate Car Act, which forced segregation of train cars, violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment was made in order to abolish slavery, while the object of the Fourteenth Amendment was to enforce the absolute equality of the two races before the law. The name of "Ferguson" was given to the case because the judge at the trial was named John Howard Ferguson.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Many people will assume that segregation was in effect immediately after the civil war was finished. This is an incorrect assumption. Segregation at large wasn’t given a constitutional precedent until 1896, when the supreme court decided the case of Plessy v. Ferguson. Homer Plessy was a white man who was one eighth black, who had been asked to ride in a separate rail car from the whites. When he refused he was arrested. He then appealed his case up to the supreme court. This case set the precedent for separate but equal laws to follow.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Armarcion D. Henderson v. The United States of America, 11-9307 (2011) Retrieved from sblog.s3.amaxonaws.com Academic database < http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/11-9307-Henderson-v.-U.S.-Petition.pdf>…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virginia V Black

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    B) The first amendment permits a State to ban “True threats” which encompass those statements where the speaker means to communicate a serious expression of intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or groups of individuals. The speaker need not actually intent to carry out the threat. Intimidation is a type of true threat, where a speaker directs a threat to a person or group of persons with the intent of placing the victim in fear of bodily harm or death.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott, an African American man who was born into slavery, wanted what all slaves would have wanted, their freedom. They were mistreated, neglected, and treated not as humans, but as property. In 1852, Dred Scott sued his current owner, Sanford, about him, no longer being a slave, but a free man (Oyez 1). In Article four of the Constitution, it states that any slave, who set foot in a free land, makes them a free man. This controversy led to the ruling of the state courts and in the end, came to the final word of the Supreme Court. Is he a slave or a free man?…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Segregation Wrong

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Looking at it that way, the segregated train mandate did not violate the 14th Amendment’s equal protection requirement. The train cars were “separate, but equal,” and therefore it was constitutional”’(Source 1). This shows that it was okay to segregate it was separate but equal anyways. This also shows that it was constitutional and no where in the constitution did it say it was wrong if they were separate but equal. In conclusion, it was not wrong for them to separate the train cars as long as they were separate but…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1892, Homer Plessy, an African-American train passenger, refused to sit a Jim Crow car when told. By committing this act, he broke Louisiana law. Again, a case was brought to the Supreme Court questioning the constitutionality of segregation. By a 7-1 vote, the “separate but equal” doctrine was established. This only affirmed the institution of and ideology behind racial segregation. Justice John Marshall Harlan, the lone dissenter, recognized that the Constitution recognizes “no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens” and that by upholding segregation the Court was overstepping its boundaries to bend history in favor of a social agenda. From there the Jim Crow era took off sending the nation into a downward…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court denied that there was any violation of Brown's rights because of the "separate but…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays