Plebeian Vs Patrician Class

The economic and political differences found in the patrician class vs the plebian class are the ultimate reason for the lengthy revolt of the plebeians, who wished to share an equal plane of existence as that of the patricians.
The Romans, run by a largely aristocratic system, were separated into two classes of citizens. According to Morey, Patricians were those higher ranking and wealthy citizens who governed the cities. Certain families were held in this category, and one could not become a patrician by means of wealth or marriage. In fact, patricians and plebeians couldn't marry, according to law. Patricians, states the Ducksters article on the subject, could hold any governing or religious position, made and enforced the laws passed down secretly in their family, owned the land, and controlled the army.
They were the peasants of the Romans, and were the majority of the people. Poor, and without rights, these people were the craftsmen, soldiers, and indebted working class of Romans.
Unhappy with their lack of decent conditions and lack of rights, the plebeians went on a number of revolts and strikes in which they threatened to abandon ship and start their own city, refused to fight, and protested the remaining limitations set upon them. The patricians in response gave in, little by little, very grudgingly, to the demands of the plebeians, out of lack of choice. Without the plebeians the cities could not function. The majority of the people were plebeians, and this included soldiers as well as all other city dwellers and farmers that the place relied on. (Ducksters)
Originally, only the debts were cancelled. But this was not enough. The revolt continued, resulting in the laws of the twelve tables, where the laws by which the cities must be governed were finally put into writing, taking some of the power of decision away from the patricians, who now needed to follow the rules known by