Preview

Plato's Argument On Equality

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1082 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato's Argument On Equality
The argument therefore follows that there must be “Equality” in order for two objects to be compared; we can say two objects are equal but they do not possess true “Equality”. “Equality” in its true form cannot be experienced because it is a conception of what it means for two things to be perfectly equal. Even though we can conceive the idea of equality, we can not experience it, and neither can we do so whilst in the body, (iep.com). Since equality cannot be experienced through the body, it must be able to be experienced by the soul. This would therefore mean that knowledge could only be accessible through reason and is therefore a priori in its existence within the body, (iep.com). Plato therefore argues that the soul is the means to which …show more content…
Why is it the case that a soul is alive before birth, obtains knowledge, then enters a body and loses its knowledge. He claims that we must have acquired the knowledge of the Forms before we were born but then lost it at birth. After this, the knowledge was recovered due to our sense and therefore we begin to recollect, (iep.com). However, Socrates is not certain that when he dies, he will gain access to the realm of Forms, he mentions his dream-state and states that he will remember what happened. What is the point of having dreams or memories if you can not remember them …show more content…
Plato presupposes that there exist two kinds of things: Forms and particulars (Phaedo,103). To explain, Plato’s Forms are comparable to for example, hot things, cold things, beautiful things, amongst others. What every hot, cold, or beautiful thing has in common with other hot, cold,beautiful things, are that they share in the Forms of Hotness, Coldness, or Beauty, (iep.com). One difference between Plato’s theory of Forms and the common theories of universals is that Plato does not introduce a Form for every kind of thing. It is not necessary to assume that there is a Form for every predicate; however, in the Phaedo, Plato introduces Forms that are shared in by particulars in several specific ways. Particulars are referred to as the things that are hot, cold or beautiful. A stove, a fork, and a tree for example are particulars. All these particulars share in a Form. For example, we might have a hot stove, sharing in the Form of Hotness; a cold fork, sharing in the Form of Coldness, and a beautiful tree, sharing in the Form of Beauty. When you define something like beauty, you define what the Form is. Forms are the objects of definitions. So this means you can define beauty, justice, tallness, hotness, amongst the rest. And, whatever these definitions are, the objects of the definitions are the Forms of Beauty, Justice, Tallness, and Hotness just to name a few. Particulars do not necessarily

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Deja Vu

    • 1969 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates advised that if ones soul had not deceased from the previous life wouldn’t some information be retained to the next life?…

    • 1969 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Plato and other prominent philosophers such as Plutarch and Heraclitus were observing the world, they came to the conclusion that it was in a state of flux; they came to the conclusion that it was constantly changing. Plato wrote a number of texts including Phaedo and Republic; this worked with his dualistic approach concluding that our realm of appearances – or our world; and all within is changeable and will eventually cease to exist. He says that this world is nothing but a mere copy of forms, and the forms are described as the eternal and perfect idea of what a thing is. The world of the forms, to Plato is the only realm where true knowledge lies, Plato defined this as the realm of reality; this could in fact be trusted unlike our own world. There are a few reasons to Plato as to why The Forms exist, and these reasons are present through his work for example through The Theory of Recollection, and The Imperfection Argument. But several philosophers have critiqued Plato’s notion and they argued Plato’s arguments are actually just reasons for why forms should exist; rather than actual proof of the existence. Furthermore, The Third Man Argument in Plato’s ‘Parmenides’ brings a prominent problem for the theory of The Forms. For example, Russell called it ‘One…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A famous Greek Philosopher named Plato was a duellist who believed that the soul is indeed distinct from the body. Plato believed that the soul is more important than the body as the body is apart of the empirical world and like all objects is subject to change (in a constant motion of change). Plato said that the body and its senses cannot be a reliable guide to the truth as it did not pre – exist in his idea of “the world of forms” and so the body can only seek truth from experience which in reality would not be the “real truth”. Plato also believed that the soul enables us to have knowledge as it pre-existed before birth in the world of forms. This is said to be the reason why we can understand things such as beauty in the world as the soul had already experienced them prior to our existence.…

    • 698 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato uses the Forms to try to show that the soul is eternal. He says that the soul and the body are different things, and the body is just a container for the soul. He even goes further by saying that the soul is trying to get back to its pure state. By these statements Plato is saying that the body is physical, which means that it is only temporary, it changes, and imperfect. On the other hand, the soul is non-physical and therefore is eternal, unchanging, perfect and universal. However, this is insufficient information to base his argument that all souls are the same on. All souls are different because every person is different. If the soul and makes a person and every person is different that means that every soul has its own personality or characteristics. This is shown everyday because know two people are exactly alike, not even twins. Aristotle talks about a similar reason for not following the Forms. Aristotle states that if the Forms are supposed to be perfect and unchanging, how is it possible for one thing to be better than the other. For example, it is like saying that beauty is an eternal Form that doesn’t change. However, in fact it does change because has the ability to be more beautiful than…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle thought that Plato's theory of forms with its two separate realms failed to explain what it was meant to. That is, it failed to explain how there could be permanence and order in this world and how we could have objective knowledge of this world. By separating the realm of forms so radically from the material realm, Plato made it impossible to explain how the realm of forms made objectivity and permanence possible in the material realm. The objectivity and permanence of the realm of forms does not help to explain the material world because the connection between the two worlds is so hard to understand. The theory of forms, therefore, is an unnecessary proposal. There is no need to split the world up into two separate realms in order to explain objectivity and permanence in our experience.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Argument Analysis

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To Plato, there existed fundamental patterns in the universe, Forms so pure and unblemished that most people will never know them, even as they act as existence in its purest form. All around us, everyday objects toe the line between these pure existences, never committing to one yet never abandoning one. To those few who could gaze upon these paradigms and look beyond the pale imitations in every object, Plato gave the name Philosophers. In the Book V of the Republic, Plato’s definition of philosophers is essential in illustrating the closest possible parallel in real life to his model city by taking account of the occasion of the argument and acting as the foundation of his argument.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato's Republic, the protagonist Socrates provides three proofs that a just life is more satisfying than an unjust life. Of the three proofs, The third is the focus of our attention today. It states that “ when the entire soul follows the philosophophic part, there is no civil war in it, each part of it does its own work exclusively and is just, and in a particular it enjoys its own pleasures, the best and truest pleasures possible for it... but when one of the other parts gains control, it won't be able to secure its own pleasure and will compel the other parts to pursue an alien and untrue pleasure” 586e-587a. I believe that the third proof is meant to distinguish between genuine pleasure and the relief of pain.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we conclude that knowledge is recollected through the forms rather than taught, we must understand what this recollection of past knowledge means in the way of the possible immortality of the soul. This theory of recollection is supported by the argument that prior to birth the soul exists in an alternate world where it acquires knowledge of the forms. At birth however, this knowledge of the forms that the soul carries is lost. We can then understand that…

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue and knowledge can only be learned through one’s self and not through others. Man’s experiences while on earth are very important moments that aid him in obtaining recollection. Both of these statements take part in Plato’s doctrine of recollection. To put it into simpler terms, Plato’s doctrine of recollection goes something along the lines of “how learning is possible.” Plato believed that there was an endless amount of possibilities in another realm.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato believed there are two types of realms. He said there are a realm of appearances and a realm of forms. “To understand Plato's worldview, it is important to grasp the distinction that he makes between sensible "things" and "forms" (Russo).” There is no proof that there are two types of realms. “Thinking is not the same thing as the having of sensations; it is not literally true that “seeing is believing” (Engle, 271).”…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory of Recollection

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After questioning the boy, Socrates distinguishes between knowledge and true belief. He says inquiry without knowledge is possible if true belief is present. Recollection, as defined by Socrates, suggests the immortality of the soul and claims that we have all existed previously. Through previous being, our souls have learned everything there is to know. Without the idea the soul is immortal we can not have knowledge. Socrates also believes he has a disavowal of knowledge, meaning that he believes he has wisdom, but does not actually claim to know anything.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato's Forms

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages

    "The essence of [Plato's] theory of Ideas (Forms) lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, for which the best name is probably "universal," that are entirely different from sensible things" (Allen 18). Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universals. In Scaltsas' Substances and Universals in Aristotle's Metaphysics, he defines universals as being "the object of understanding and thought, the object of knowledge, and indeed of scientific knowledge…" (33).…

    • 2042 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato Theory of Forms

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato's Theory of Forms is not something that is easy to understand. According to him the forms are a class concept that is a perfect example of the form itself. To anyone scanning through the forms they might not grasp the full concept Plato is trying to get across. However, if time is taken to examine Plato's theory it can make sense. For Plato everything has a pure form. If you take any property of an object and separate it from the object itself, you are left contemplating a form.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato felt that there are two different levels of reality compared to Aristotle who felt that there was only one level of reality. Plato’s way of thinking always came from ideas from within that were applied to the outside world as opposed to Aristotle whose ideas came from the outside world and then were applied within. These contrast ideas were a result in Aristotle believing that there is one level of reality. He believed that there was only one world, and that forms existed in particular things. Aristotle felt that everything was matter, and certain kinds of matter were composed into different things. He believed that form did not have a separate existence, but existed in matter. Plato, however, believed that there were two levels of reality. Physical and mental were two different things in his eyes. Physical is what is real and you can see and/or touch, and mental is what seems to be real but cannot be seen such as air. Plato believed that there are “two worlds” and that everything real has a form but does not symbolize that form.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato offers two main analogies to examine the definition of justice. The division of parts in the soul as well as the parts of the state. Both of the parts have some similar things. Plato claims that the justice is the same in the soul and in the state. In the analogy of the state Plato supports the definition of justice as “doing one’s own work”. It becomes obvious that in order for justice to remain in the state each person has to do his own work and not meddle with others.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays