Preview

Plaintiff Vs. Co. V.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
557 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plaintiff Vs. Co. V.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

MARY MARSDEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) )
JOHN NMN DOE, ) ) Cause No.: Defendant. ) ) Division:
Serve Defendant at: ) )
Missouri Division of )
Employment Security )
Claims Department )
505 Washington Avenue )
St. Louis, Missouri 63101 ) )
Serve between 9:00 a.m. and )
4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday )

PETITION FOR DAMAGES FOR ASSAULT AND BATTERY

COMES NOW Plaintiff, MARY MARSDEN, and for her cause of action against Defendant, states to the Court as follows: COUNT I - ASSAULT AND BATTERY 1. Plaintiff is a resident of the City of St. Louis, Missouri. 2. Defendant is a resident of Jefferson County, Missouri but is employed at the Missouri Division of Employment Security which is located in the City of St. Louis, Missouri and is the place where the wrong complained of took place. 3.
…show more content…
On or about February 28, 1997, at approximately 4:20 p.m. in the offices of the Missouri Division of Employment Security located at 505 Washington Avenue, in the City of St. Louis, Missouri 63101, Defendant, John Doe, came up behind the Plaintiff who was then sitting at her desk and wrapped the fingers of his hands around her face and tried to push his fingers into her mouth. Defendant is a very large man and Plaintiff was unable to free herself from his vise-like grip. Defendant pulled Plaintiff's head back during his attack on her and caused her to suffer physical pain, emotional trauma and extreme fear for her

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The court decided that plaintiff's complaint states a cognizable cause of action against the defendants for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Accordingly, the defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint is denied.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FACTS OF THE CASE: The Appellant, Director of Finance at Toyota Marin Lou Suriyan Sisuphan, took almost $30,000 in order to persuade the termination of Sisuphan’s coworker Ian McClelland by suggesting that McClelland should be held responsible for the lost money. The Appellant did not have the intention to take this money permanently, and returned the money before any charges were filed, but not within the 24 hour amnesty period that the dealership offered. The dealership terminated Sisphan’s employment, and charged Sisuphan with a “felony offense of embezzlement by an employee of property valued in excess of $400 (§§ 487, subd. (a), 508, & 514) and alleging a prior assault conviction (§ 245, subd. (a)(2)) as a sentence enhancement.”JUDICIAL HISTORY: The trial court found Sisuphan…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To: Plaintiff Justin King and his attorney, Jane Doe, 123 Main Street, Chicago, IL 60601…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the early morning hours of September 18, 1992, a police officer employed by defendant Town of Cheektowaga pulled over an automobile owned by plaintiff's decedent, Jacqueline Walsh. An acquaintance of Walsh was driving and she was a passenger. As the result of the traffic stop, the acquaintance was placed under arrest for driving while intoxicated. Based upon his observations of Walsh, the officer determined that Walsh was also intoxicated and unable to drive safely. The officer testified that he offered to call a cab or give Walsh a ride to any destination she chose, but Walsh…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    coming to the court with me, Mary. You will tell it in court.” (page 80) When his attempts fail,…

    • 612 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Memorandum of Law

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Was Cruz Estrada’s Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure violated when Officer Green grabbed Cruz Estrada’s purse from her shoulder and searched it without her consent, and can the evidence found in Cruz Estrada’s purse be suppressed due to the search being impermissible?…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    pa110 unit 3 assignment

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When Nayan was living in Alberta, he engaged the services of Rebecca Vandeworp, a Barrie Real Estate agent with Re/Max Chay Realty Inc. (“Rebecca”), to help him find a suitable home for his family to move…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff, a lecturer, was employed by the defendant. She was given three months’ notice of termination of her contract of employment upon her marriage. She took an action against the defendant for the wrongful dismissal.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On November 29, 1947, the plaintiff entered on a written agreement, Exhibit A, with the defendant, the most important provisions of which are (1) that they shall organize a partnership for the bottling and distribution of Mision soft drinks, plaintiff to act as industrial partner or manager, and the defendant as a capitalist, furnishing the capital necessary therefor; (2) that the defendant was to decide matters of general policy regarding the business, while the plaintiff was to attend to the operation and development of the bottling plant; (3) that the plaintiff was to secure the Mission Soft Drinks franchise for and in behalf of the proposed partnership; and (4) that the plaintiff was to receive 30 per cent of the net profits of the business. The above agreement was arrived at after various conferences and consultations by and between them, with the assistance of their respective attorneys. Prior to entering into this agreement, plaintiff had informed the Mission Dry Corporation of Los Angeles, California, U.S.A., manufacturers of the bases and ingridients of the beverages bearing its name, that he had interested a prominent financier (defendant herein) in the business, who was willing to invest half a million dollars in the bottling and distribution of the said beverages, and requested, in order that he may close the deal with him, that the right to bottle and distribute be granted him for a limited time under the condition that it will finally be transferred to the corporation (Exhibit H). Pursuant for this request, plaintiff was given "a thirty-days" option on exclusive bottling and distribution rights for the Philippines" (Exhibit…

    • 9969 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Respondent humbly submits this memorandum in response to the appeal filed before this Honourable Court. . It sets forth the facts and the laws on which the claims are based.…

    • 3685 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Proceedings of the case: Counsel for the plaintiff along with Mutwalli of the plaintiff was present as Public Witness 1 (PW1), to be chief examined and to be cross examined by defending counsel.…

    • 3771 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Motion To Quash

    • 2584 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Accused, by his undersigned attorney, respectfully moves to quash the information filed against him on the ground that:…

    • 2584 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    crim pro

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Vs Dazul 18 Sept. 1980 RA 6036 Quashal Pre Trial Art. III, Sec 14(2) People vs. Durango5 April 2000…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Complaint Sample

    • 1212 Words
    • 4 Pages

    COMES NOW the Complainant, by the undersigned attorney, and unto this Honorable Court, respectfully avers:…

    • 1212 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays