Philosophies Of Decriminalization
The author will attempt to briefly describe the philosophies of decriminalization, legalization and drug treatment. I will conclude with my opinion regarding the good and bad about these said philosophies.
Crime Reduction
Decriminalization
The philosophy behind decriminalization is regulating and reducing the severity of penalties (Dolgon, Baker, 2011). Decriminalization, legalization, and drug treatment are all approaches to the nation’s war on drugs and ever growing jail compounds. Decriminalization reflects changing social and moral perspectives. A general public may come to the view that a demonstration is not destructive, ought to never again be criminalized, or is generally not a matter to be addressed by the criminal equity framework. …show more content…
In this case were speaking of certain drugs deemed useful for medicinal purposes. Legalization is a procedure regularly connected to what are regarded as, by those working towards authorization, as harmless violations, of which one illustration is the utilization of illicit medications. Legitimization ought to be contrasted differently in relation to decriminalization, which expels criminal allegations from an activity. Authorization bestows more administrative control. Advocates of libertarianism bolster legitimization of what they see as harmless wrongdoings, for example, recreational medication and alcohol use, weapon proprietorship, and prostitution. In the U. S. migration setting, the expression authorization is casually used to allude to a procedure whereby a man illicitly exhibit in the nation can get legal changeless habitation. The US law has given the sanctioning technique known as registry, which essentially requires the candidate to demonstrate that he has consistently lived in the nation since before a specific indicated registry date and is not unacceptable on different …show more content…
These philosophies have great potential to work. However, my main concern is not whether or not decriminalization and legalization could be a good thing, rather, my concern is should they be a good thing? For instance, legalization of marijuana indeed has proven to curb criminal activity simply because the government said it is no longer illegal. In my opinion, I believe in the broken window effect that states that if we start making things that were initially illegal, no longer illegal, then the rest will follow. Before long, many illegal acts and substances will start to become legal thus sending a message to people that if they continue to conduct illegal crimes, that the government will at some point make that crime legal to keep from overcrowding jails. This all is up to interpretation as many of the laws are. The government in fact deems the legalization of marijuana is a minor crime among other crimes such as murder. However, who is to say that at some point, that certain violent crimes will become a right and not an illegal
Crime Reduction
Decriminalization
The philosophy behind decriminalization is regulating and reducing the severity of penalties (Dolgon, Baker, 2011). Decriminalization, legalization, and drug treatment are all approaches to the nation’s war on drugs and ever growing jail compounds. Decriminalization reflects changing social and moral perspectives. A general public may come to the view that a demonstration is not destructive, ought to never again be criminalized, or is generally not a matter to be addressed by the criminal equity framework. …show more content…
In this case were speaking of certain drugs deemed useful for medicinal purposes. Legalization is a procedure regularly connected to what are regarded as, by those working towards authorization, as harmless violations, of which one illustration is the utilization of illicit medications. Legitimization ought to be contrasted differently in relation to decriminalization, which expels criminal allegations from an activity. Authorization bestows more administrative control. Advocates of libertarianism bolster legitimization of what they see as harmless wrongdoings, for example, recreational medication and alcohol use, weapon proprietorship, and prostitution. In the U. S. migration setting, the expression authorization is casually used to allude to a procedure whereby a man illicitly exhibit in the nation can get legal changeless habitation. The US law has given the sanctioning technique known as registry, which essentially requires the candidate to demonstrate that he has consistently lived in the nation since before a specific indicated registry date and is not unacceptable on different …show more content…
These philosophies have great potential to work. However, my main concern is not whether or not decriminalization and legalization could be a good thing, rather, my concern is should they be a good thing? For instance, legalization of marijuana indeed has proven to curb criminal activity simply because the government said it is no longer illegal. In my opinion, I believe in the broken window effect that states that if we start making things that were initially illegal, no longer illegal, then the rest will follow. Before long, many illegal acts and substances will start to become legal thus sending a message to people that if they continue to conduct illegal crimes, that the government will at some point make that crime legal to keep from overcrowding jails. This all is up to interpretation as many of the laws are. The government in fact deems the legalization of marijuana is a minor crime among other crimes such as murder. However, who is to say that at some point, that certain violent crimes will become a right and not an illegal