Preview

Pharma Update 08 Nov 2014

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
766 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pharma Update 08 Nov 2014
November 08, 2014

Pharma Sector Update
(Sector Analysts: Kanika Singh, Neha Kumar and Ravi Karanam)

USFDA revokes Ranbaxy's 180-day exclusivity on sale of two generic drugs in US, grants approval to Dr. Reddy for one of them
The USFDA has reverted its tentative approvals granting Ranbaxy six-months sales exclusivity of the generic versions of Roche's anti-viral drug Valcyte and AstraZeneca's heartburn pill Nexium. Ranbaxy had first-to-file status on both these drugs and it was expected to earn USD 60 million and USD 180 million from the generic versions of Valcyte and Nexium respectively in the exclusive sale period. The USFDA said that its original decision of granting tentative approvals were erroneous because of the compliance status of the facilities mentioned in the ANDAs (Abbreviated New Drug Application) filed by Ranbaxy, as a result of which in FDA's view, Ranbaxy had forfeited its eligibility for 180-day exclusivity for its ANDA for Valcyte. The news could hit the shares of Ranbaxy and Sun Pharma, already under CCI's scanner for the $4 billion M&A deal, the decision for which is expected this month. Earlier in the week,Ranbaxy had received approval from the USFDA to manufacture and market Fenofibrate capsules, used for lowering high cholesterol and triglyceride levels in the blood.
The revocation of Ranbaxy's 180-day exclusivity on sale has turned out to be a positive news for Dr. Reddy's Laboratories which has been granted the final approval by USFDA to make cheaper versions of Valcyte. The company is expected to launch the drug shortly in the US market.
ROC questions Plethico Pharmaceuticals over complaints from investors on the fixed deposit schemes
The Registrar of Companies (ROC),Gwalior is inspecting the books of accounts of the Indore-based Plethico Pharmaceuticals, following hundreds of complaints received by the investor grievance cell of the corporate affairs ministry for almost a year. The investors claimed that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Biomax Case Summary

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Company's primary strategy is to get those prescriptions surrendered by other pharmaceutical organizations. Despite the fact that the Company has received 4 standards to screen among the competitors, in any case it confronts the potential danger of disappointment. Drug organizations relinquished these items for a mixture of great reason including security, viability and benefit potential. Why does the Medicines Company have the Golden Finger? There is no such ensure that items which consent to the 4 criteria will end up being a blockbuster product. The Company seems to fail to offer an agreeable advertising arrangement for Angiomax and other future medications that are coming to company regarding to FDA. So we should stay sensible about…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merck and Vioxx

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In May of 1999, the FDA approved the use of rofecoxib. Marketed under the name of Vioxx, rofecoxib was manufactured and distributed by Merck, a large pharmaceutical company. Doctors prescribed the drug as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and prescription painkiller. Five years after its release, rofecoxib was withdrawn because of a study that showed the drug more than doubled the risk of heart attack or stroke. Because of Merck’s ongoing and increasing knowledge of the dangerous effects of the drug while continuing to distribute rofecoxib, Merck should be held accountable for acting unethically.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Section 503A of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 353a exempts compounded drugs from certain provisions of the Food and Drug Administration’s standard approval requirements; provided that the distributors abide by certain restrictions, including advertising and promoting selected compounded drugs. The Act, however, did not prohibit the advertising of its effectiveness. The Central Hudson Gas et. Elec. Corp v. Public Serv. Comm’n of NY, 447 U.S. 557, 566 held that the restrictions directly advance its interests, or that less restrictive alternatives were unavailable.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: David, F.I. & PL, J. (2013). Compound Pharmacy Regulatory Update: Senate to Vote on…

    • 3430 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This has led to the convention of the NSURE (Nonprescription Safe Use Regulatory Expansion) initiative, which aims to expand the regulatory constraints associated with the non-prescription drug category, in hopes of providing increased access to adequate medical care for the public. The NSURE initiative was conceptualized to aid the process of Rx-to-OTC switches by expanding the ‘Conditions of Safe Use’. According to the presentation of Theresa M. Michele, MD, Director, Division of Nonprescription Clinical Evaluation of the FDA, at a conference on OTC drugs held in October 2014, the existing switch process has a few limitations, mentioned below. • The purchase decision for the OTC drugs is based only on the information conveyed through the Drug Facts label and the principal display panel • The switch process is restricted in its communication with the consumer and doesn’t take…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pharm 100 Review

    • 6292 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Liver Cancer: higher incidence in China and other Asian countries due to Hep B infection and contamination of foods by aflatoxin B1 which is released from molds that grow on grains in warmer climates…

    • 6292 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Questions 6

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Underutilization of new effective drugs is a serious concern for pharmaceutical companies. There are many restrictions on pharmaceuticals companies to make their drug available for everyone. Certain restrictions like Medicaid will only allow specific medicine to be reimbursable. If a…

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pepcid Ac

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The major hurdle in launching Pepcid AC as an OTC drug was getting it approved by FDA. JJM pursued. Tagamet had an early lead in the FDA approval process. JJM was pursuing a strategy comprising of both a treatment and a prevention claim to launch Pepcid AC in the OTC market. However, FDA advisory committee rejected SmithKline Beecham 's proposal for Tagamet in 1993 and in the following year also rejected JJM 's proposal for Pepcid AC. FDA approval process for an OTC medication requires demonstrating the efficacy of the low dosage drug,…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this particular case, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and Novartis AG were being investigated in 2011 by the European Commission (EC) for antitrust behavior because they were suspected of possibly colluding to keep a generic painkiller off the market. As presented in the article "Novartis, J&J Face EU Antitrust Investigation" (Whalen, 2011), "In markets where J&J's patents on Fentanyl have expired, Novartis's generic-drug unit Sandoz sells low-cost copies of the drug". Upon expiration…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction AstraZeneca PLC (AstraZeneca, AZN:NYSE, AZN:LSE) is one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. It was formed in 1999 from the merger of Sweden’s Astra AB and UK’s Zeneca Group plc. Core Activities AstraZeneca is engaged in the discovery, development, manufacturing and marketing of prescription pharmaceuticals and biological products for important areas of healthcare: Cardiovascular, Gastrointestinal, Infection, Neuroscience, Oncology, and Respiratory and Inflammation. One of the key benefits of the merger between Astra and Zeneca is seen as their portfolio of new products in development: AstraZeneca call this their 'product pipeline'. – Cardiovascular product pipeline includes Saxagliptin, Atherosclerosis/dyslipidaemia, Thrombosis and Atrial fibrillation. Gastrointestinal pipeline includes life cycle management initiatives. AstraZeneca's Infection pipeline MedImmune and Dedicated tuberculosis (TB) research. Oncology product pipeline includes Zactima (vandetanib), Zactima (vandetanib), ZD4054 and MedImmune. Dapagliflozin,…

    • 2438 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Biased Research

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Consequently, happened that Avandia drug had influenced documentation on the dangerous side effects that remained unknown. One assumption is an individual taking the drug that the research had gone through a rigorous test. The FDA learned about the dangerous side effects that caused heart attacks and required that the GlaxoSmithKline drug maker of Avandia drug to perform a study to determine the possible dangers. Although, GlaxoSmithKline drug research denied information from the FDA. The FDA started bias restriction research that drug manufacturers would have to release publications of data showing medication side effects. Therefore, as a consumer, it's hard to trust the result of the pharmaceutical making companies, research that is bias instead of truth and This doesn’t happen because it is challenging for the consumer to believe them. However, GlaxoSmithKline continues to hide data and remains biased over incomplete information that sanctions profit without concern for the medical health of individuals. Therefore, the pharmaceutical researchers remain biased because they just did not conduct scientific analyzing of rigorous testing and publishing the full…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eli Lily Case Study

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It was a right strategy for Eli Lilly that started a joint venture with Ranbaxy to enter the Indian market. First of all, Ranbaxy was the second largest pharmaceutical company that manufactures bulk drugs and generic drugs in India, with a domestic market share of 15 per cent. It had established broad distribution network, and it was the second largest exporter of all products in India. Ranbaxy’s capital costs were 50 per cent to 75 per cent lower than those of comparable U.S. plants. Second, the timing was perfect for Eli Lilly to enter the Indian market. During 1970s, the Patents Act 1970 and the Drug Price Control Order (DPCO) was issued. And India was opening its drug market. Third, there was possibility to conduct cheap clinical trials in India.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FMB&T

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are two main points in this case. The first one is that AH Biotech will be the first to bring that particular drug to the market faster and cheaper. The second one is that the company considers the problem of offering people dramatic relief then snatches it away after getting approved. It is an ethical dilemma that the company faces.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    It claimed that the above property made it a new and superior product as it increased its property of storage and process. Its claim for patent was rejected by Chennai Patent Office on grounds of lacking novelty, innovative step and being unpatentable in view of Section 3(d). Then Novartis challenged the decision before the Honorable Madras High court in a writ petition. It claimed before the High Court that Indian Patent law is not consistent with World Trade organization (WTO) Rules. It appealed the court to invalidate Section 3(d). The High Court rejected this plea and transferred the matter to the ‘Intellectual Property Appellate Board’ which also rejected its patent as it found it to be unpatentable under Section 3(d) of the Indian Patents Act. IPAB observed that the drug does not have a new molecule but has a modified version of a known compound for which Novartis failed to show any increased efficacy. But IPAB had also observed that Novartis satisfied the other requirements for patent, i.e. ‘novelty’ and ‘non obviousness to person skilled in art ‘. Based on its observations, IPAB rejected the application on 26 June, 2009.…

    • 2434 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. How did Zocor neutralize the entry strategy of Vidastat in the anti-cholesterol market? If you were the product manager for Zocor, what might your strategy have been if you had been faced with the same situation?…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays