Preview

Persuasive Essay: Should Torture Be Justified?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
913 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Essay: Should Torture Be Justified?
Humans are being chained up, beaten down and interrogated day after day without mercy. Torture is a great issue globally today. Ill treatment is no longer effective to receive correct information in this day and age. People are losing their basic rights very often as a result to torture. Humans are treated like animals, when there are more sophisticated ways of getting information. Torture also causes a lot more problems than it fixes. Torture should not be justified because it is ineffective, inhumane and unnecessary.
Torture should not be justified because torture is ineffective. Accurate information does not always result from torture. A study proves this by stating “Under torture a person will say anything to stop being tortured” (McCain). In other words, what people say while being tortured are not actual facts.
…show more content…
Accounts from Rodgers, a torture victim, reinforce the fact that torture is ineffective. “First they make you crazy. Next you believe you are going to die, so there is no point in confessing” (Rodgers). Torture does not make you want to confess, it just makes you worried and insane. “What torture does is frighten people” (Zink). If torture only causes irrational thinking and does not make people confess accurate information then it is ineffective. Torture should not be justified because it is ineffective.
Torture should not be justified because it is inhumane. One reason torture is inhumane is because it violates human rights. The USA has power to violate human rights to counter terrorism which includes torture (Gao). The United States is a world power and many other countries look to American forms of counterterrorism as a model. A study from China agrees with this saying “China tortures its citizens; this is a violation of the convention against torture” (Yang). If naturally born human rights are being taken away, then torture is inhumane. Torture also goes against human

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torture is illegal because it breaks the 8th Amendment of the Constitution. The Constitution states that the 8th Amendment of the Constitution states that cruel and unusual punishment is illegal . “The detainees were sexually humiliated for punishment and for fun in Guantanamo Bay” (ThinkProgress). These are not only illegal but they are hate crimes too, The US government makes the guards believe that all of the detainees are bad because they are Muslims when they are not. EIT breaks the 8th amendment so it must be abolished.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If torture is used in retaliation and as an “eye to eye” concept, then torture would be an unethical way of punishing someone (Guidebook). For this example, I would argue that torture is being used to provide the members with the realization for their actions, so torture is an unethical way of punishment. Also, torture is not a replacement for the death penalty, so it is not saving an individual’s life because in the guidebook it states that if “torture is vengeful and not being used to protect innocent lives, then it is not technically a moral reason for punishing someone” (Guidebook). Without protecting innocent lives, torture cannot be considered an ethical reason for punishing someone, so I would argue that the type of punishment that should be used is an elongated amount of jail time. Incarceration meets all the requirements for being a moral type of punishment because it doesn't cause mental harm that torture would and incarcerating the members would not be a retaliating…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States has always prided itself on being a country of freedom. A country with liberty and justice for all. How can we as a nation still pride ourselves on these virtues when we subject people to torture? Where does the line get drawn when we allow torture to be used? We look at the Constitutional rights and the Geneva Convention, as having rules which clearly frown upon the use of torture. However under the Patriot Act we have seen the use of powers under this act to allow the use of torture which contradict the Constitution and the Geneva Convention, which were intended to stop the use of torture, and this become an issue. Do we terminate the use of torture, or do we continue to use the cruel, inhumane, and degrading acts on captivated ‘terrorists’?…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should torture be once again instituted by American interrogators? No; torture is degrading, inhumane, and futile. Torture is a violation of human rights, and prohibited in international law (“Convention”). The use of waterboarding damages the American government’s credibility. The act should never…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated bibliography

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Very brief summary: The article ‘Using torture is illegal and never justified’ argues against torture by mainly focusing on the fact that the information gained from torture is highly unreliable because the prisoner could be lying to get the torture to stop. Who makes the decisions is also called into question.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Use Of Torture

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    None of these studies except Hanns Scharff`s have not been studied why we need to torture and not just have a conservation with trickery and deceitfulness instead of torturing people that may or may not have anything to do with what is happening between countries and have no information about the topic in hand therefore will be tortured until death because of the lack of information that they have.Most people are just pons playing in a king's battle that have no information even if they joined their…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy In Torture

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Using torture to as a way to gain intelligence involves a tremendous amount of assumptions. The Torturer is assuming that they have the correct person, they are assuming as the victims level of involvement and guilt in the situation, and lastly by using torture they are assuming that there is no alternative way to extract the information.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the topic of torture, most of us will readily agree that torturing someone in order to get information is not the answer. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of how guilty a person is, and what should be done in the case of a bombing. On the one hand, people argue that torture is unconstitutional and should not be practiced because it questions a person’s morality and what they are willing to do in order to get results. On the other hand, however, others argue that we should allow torture because it is more just than allowing thousands of innocents to die because we didn’t want to question a single person. I have mixed feelings on the topic. While I recognize that our actions may be for the greater good, we cannot allow ourselves to lose our morality because of it. I do not believe that a person should be tortured for information unless it is under specific circumstances. What I mean by this is that people should not torture someone unless that person is obviously guilty or it is…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torture continues to be a subject of great debate in this country. The question as to whether Torture is an acceptable and justifiable method to coax a confession from a criminal has been brought to the forefront by recent events, such as the September 11th and Boston bombing. Although there are laws established to punish criminals, the criminal must first be found guilt for punishment to be rendered as stated by the U.S constitution. However, using torture to coax a confession is in direct conflict with the rights given to the all people by the constitution, therefore, it should not be practiced to any extend. Torture violates the essence of our democracy by tearing away an individual’s rights and subjective them to cruel punishment, a clear violation of the 8th amendment. Advocated of torture believe that it is a…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many questions relating to the use of torture against any person whatsoever. As such, there are different perspectives on the ethics of its usage as well. While some believe that the use of torture becomes necessary at times, others believe that whatever the circumstances are, torture can never be justified. Some very pertinent issues related to the use of torture are, “Suppose a child has been kidnapped and a person has been suspected of committing the crime. Is it justifiable to torture that person in order to try to extract information from him about the child? Now suppose the person would not react at all if he is subjected to torture but there is a chance that he would divulge information if his child of the similar age as the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay About Torture

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I think if the person is being tortured and has done something wrong, has endangered many innocent lives or is directly involved with a heinous crime, then it would be rational to use torture. However, I am a little skeptical if the person being tortured will become delusional and say something incorrect. Nevertheless, torture is never moral. Moreover, if people torture others purely for their own benefit, then that is treating humans as objects, “mere means" to an end (Bailey). Torture may be rational in some cases, however, it is never morally justifiable, as it is inflicting emotional and physical harm and treating humans as…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    That is one of many arguments our government makes when it comes to torture. Additionally, there are a certain group of people that agree with our government to do the inhumane action towards detainees. However, that is not always the case. From Duke University, Robin Kirk expressed, “Torture is wrong; it does not make us safer; it does not work; it paves the way for further and more reprehensible torture; it stains those who practice it; it damages torture practitioners, who live with the effects for the rest of their lives” (234). The case of torture that the American government uses is wrong and not the safest way to keep the people protected.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussions of ticking time bombs, one controversial issue has been how to deal with the alleged guilty terrorist once he is captured. On the one hand, some people, including Michael Levin, a libertarian writer and educator, argue that it is in the US government’s right to torture the guilty terrorist because his knowledge could be used to save the lives of millions. On the other hand, others, such as Philip Heymann, who is a writer that had worked in the government field, firmly states that torture should never be used because the chance that it will produce true and useful information is nearly impossible and it is vastly more crucial to preserve the international bans on torture. Shirley Jackson elaborates on Heymann’s view when she…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Americans, as a nation founded on the basis of fundamental human rights, and equality for all, torture is an unacceptable and inexcusable act that degrades us as a nation and as individuals. It debases us and makes us scarcely better than those we condemn. Just as a rose by any other name will smell just as sweet, torture by any other name remains just as deplorable.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics