Persuasive Essay: Should Animal Testing Be Banned?
Have you ever thought about the animals that are being brutally tested? Or the cute lovable animals you see everyday. The ones that have owners and live in a house? Or the ones without owners and live in steel cages hating their life? I am against animal testing and it should be banned, it’s pointless and isn’t helping anybody, so many things could go wrong so fast, and finally the laws aren’t strict enough. Those are my reasons why I think that animal testing should be banned.
First of all, Animal testing is pointless and isn’t helping anybody. 92% of drugs passed by animals fail right away when tested on humans because they are pointless. Some of the tests might not fail on the animals but , most humans would die if the medicines aren’t looked deep enough. In America, 106,000 Deaths a year are attributed to reactions to medical drugs. More than 100 million animals suffer and die in the U.S. …show more content…
The law “If the scientists keep failing tests they shall receive a two year sentence in jail” should be stretched to four years or get fired because they are killing and failing all these tests. If they keep doing the same thing over and over why don’t change what their doing or just stop? (animal testing pro vs cons)
Some people disagree that animal testing is bad, but Animal testing has had very big cures such as Breast cancer, Leukemia cancer for kids, Lung cancer, etc, but all of those cures and medicine have took a long time to develop and so many tests have failed while doing them. Think about how many animals died while being tested on. Instead they should use natural resources instead of those deadly, dangerous chemicals.
In conclusion, animal testing is NOT HELPING. All the animals can think of is what is going to happen next But there are ways to not buy products that aren’t tested on animals like all natural shampoos and conditioners. There's a lot of ways to avoid these things like looking before
First of all, Animal testing is pointless and isn’t helping anybody. 92% of drugs passed by animals fail right away when tested on humans because they are pointless. Some of the tests might not fail on the animals but , most humans would die if the medicines aren’t looked deep enough. In America, 106,000 Deaths a year are attributed to reactions to medical drugs. More than 100 million animals suffer and die in the U.S. …show more content…
The law “If the scientists keep failing tests they shall receive a two year sentence in jail” should be stretched to four years or get fired because they are killing and failing all these tests. If they keep doing the same thing over and over why don’t change what their doing or just stop? (animal testing pro vs cons)
Some people disagree that animal testing is bad, but Animal testing has had very big cures such as Breast cancer, Leukemia cancer for kids, Lung cancer, etc, but all of those cures and medicine have took a long time to develop and so many tests have failed while doing them. Think about how many animals died while being tested on. Instead they should use natural resources instead of those deadly, dangerous chemicals.
In conclusion, animal testing is NOT HELPING. All the animals can think of is what is going to happen next But there are ways to not buy products that aren’t tested on animals like all natural shampoos and conditioners. There's a lot of ways to avoid these things like looking before