Persuasive Essay On Sleepwalking

Sleepwalking is a known disorder around the world. However, asleep or not, murder is still murder, no matter what kind of sense you are in at the moment. In the end, if everything leads back to you, you are the one blamed for it all. In a courtroom, people aren’t going to be sympathetic towards your disorder when someone’s death is involved. Considering if you are really diagnosed with it, then there could be a change in prision time, but it is still a felony in the end. Therefore, you will still be charged with some kind of punishment. According to Scheffer (2010),- ¨In this case study I argue that experts, to gain relevance in a jury trial, need to fit into a manifold division of knowing. They do so by borrowing and sharing diverse knowledges. These exchanges place the modest expert testimony right into an authoritative and powerful decision-making apparatus. This argument derives from an ethnographic study of a ¨sleepwalking defense¨ (p.620). The division of knowing embraces the certified facts, the instructed case, the competing expertise, and the common sense. As a conclusion, I identify the experts’
They are unaware of what they are doing, they do not have the "guilty mind" or intention to commit the acts that they do. This can actually be used as a defence elsewhere. In Britain, should you even commit murder in your sleepwalk, you are entitled to the defence of "insanity" as it covers sleepwalking. Insanity here does not require the defendant to be medically insane but merely to be unaware of their actions. If a person not know what they are doing is wrong at the time of the offence due to a "disease of the mind" (this disease being a legal term not a medical term also). But to conclude, it is wrong to punish people who have no intention or awareness of their crime. They may need serious medical help, but punishment is not the answer so yes, if should be a legal