Preview

Patrick Henry Rhetorical Analysis Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
748 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Patrick Henry Rhetorical Analysis Paper
In 1775, during a time of political unrest, Patrick Henry addresses the delegates of the Virginia convention about the "question of freedom or slavery". Through the use of juxtapositions allusions, and metophors, Patrick Henry successfully gains support for the revolutionary cause and the colonial struggle for freedom. Henry referrs to Juxtapositions to make himself sound more credible, therefore building his ethos as he goes on with his speech. "I should consider myself as guilty of treason toward my country and of an act of disloyalty toward the majesty of heaven which I revere above all earthly kings." Henry attempts to explain to the delegates that the topic he is about to address is very controzvertial. He makes it clear that some will disagree with the forthcoming conversation, yet proceeds, feeling as if he would be betraying his country and God if he didn't bring the problems that were currently troubling the colonies to the attention of the common man. He therefore established the idea of putting God before the King. The juxtaposition in this quote identifies itself by mentioning "the majesty of heaven" next to "earthly kings", in which he is comparing the priorities of his worship in which King George falls short to the influence and significance of God in Henry's life. The purpose of using this specific example of a Juxtaposition was to show that Henry puts the will of his God before King George, showing a contrast of authority which also appeals to ethos. By claiming himself as "guilty of treason" he is making an, by other means, unacceptable argument acceptable, therefore building trust and support in his thesis. Allusions play a crucial role in the speech of Patrick Henry, since they significantly aided his credibility to gain support from the delegates of Virginia. "Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss." The patriot attempts to convince the delegates that by listening to him and considoring his proposals that they will be able to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    DEVON (20s) makes his way through the trees. He sees a bulldozer cover a massive pit filled with thousands of dead animals. Suddenly, a bullet hits a rock by his head. Devon makes a run for it as bullets continue to fly at him. A helicopter cuts off his path.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his speech to the Virginia Convention on March 23, 1775, lawyer Patrick Henry addressed delegates of the St. John’s Church in Richmond, Virginia, on the issue of the inevitable war with Britain. Henry’s purpose was to encourage the delegation to take up arms in the form of a militia and actively resist the oppression of Britain. By using a series of rhetorical questions and appealing to the delegation’s religious tendencies as well as their strong senses of patriotism, Henry delivered a powerful speech to encourage them to act on their hopes of liberty.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the “Speech to the Virginia Convention”(1775) Patrick Henry convinced colonist to fight against Britain; he constructed extensive use of three main rhetorical devices in his speech to persuade colonist to go to war and fight for what they truly desire. Presenting his speech in House of Burgesses, Henry sincerely respected his audience to gain their respect and attention to comprehend his urgency.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry gave a speech in 1775 to the Virginia Convention that convinced them to take action and fight back against Great Britain for their freedom because their methods of hope and petition failed to work. First, he used concession to opposition in the beginning of his speech to acknowledge the arguments and thoughts of the preceding speakers so that he could speak freely while he suggested treason. Secondly, he pointed out how despite the obvious facts of the start of a war, the convention continued to hope even without response from Britain. Henry stated, “Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with these war-like preparations which cover our waters and darken our land" (Henry). In addition, Henry contradicted…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To further emphasize and achieve his goal of persuading the Virginia delegates to go to war, he includes dynamic and expressive diction in statements regarding the fight for independence. “There is no retreat but in submission in slavery!” (Paragraph 11) he states, allowing the audience…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Leading up to the fierce and fiery confrontations at Lexington and Concord, a tumultuous period of debate and negotiation ensued regarding the preferred response of the colonies to British encroachment on their rights. The meeting of Virginian representatives in March of 1775 would prove to be a fruitless affair; that is, until a young, ardent lawyer by the name of Patrick Henry delivered an impassioned oration, with the intent of elucidating upon the reality of the situation: that the then-colonies were being driven to militant opposition of their royal overlords, and that to continue on passively would be to “retreat...[into] submission and slavery.” In his speech, Patrick Henry persuades the convention, and thereby the people, of the necessity of revolution through his employment of metaphorical imagery, stylized religious and mythological allusions, and a slew of rhetorical questions. In a blaze of libertarian sentiment, Henry incited the passions of the delegates and set the stage for the most glorious revolution in the history of mankind.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth and fulfill the great responsibility” (Henry 102). In 1775 people feared that America would never gain its independence from Britain and Patrick Henry changed that. Patrick Henry wanted to convince the congress to raise a militia to fight back the British. To do so Patrick Henry used Pathos in his speech “To the Virginia Convention” and was able to persuade his audience into raising a militia.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patrick Henry starts off his argument beautifully. He geniusly changes the mindset of the audience by complementing them, “...very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the house...” He then clarifies that he is not being disrespectful, even if his opinion is almost completely opposite to theirs. This is an excellent way to start, as it lowers tensions in the room and opens up the minds of the house to listen. It also serves as his first defense.…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During 1775, the American Colonies had a dispute between each other in the Virginia Convention on whether a war should be declared against Britain. For one of the meetings, Patrick Henry, an attorney and politician, gave a speech explaining his position on why the colonies should go to war. In his speech, Henry successfully applied the rhetorical strategies of metaphor and repetition to convey his argument that a war against Britain was the only right course of action to take.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As the basic human right, we are all enjoying the inherent freedom since we were born. However, 200 years ago, a group of people was fighting for their freedom perseveringly. On 23rd. March, 1765, Patrick Henry, who is the leading lights of American Revolution, gave the speech in front of Virginian audience. He responded the oppressive against the control of British. he turned colonial ideas against negotiation with England and toward armed rebellion. Patrick Henry illustrates the themes of freedom in the speech to Virginia convention through the use of the statement that there is no middle ground between freedom and slavery, the experience that how British desecrates their freedom and the emphasis on the importance of freedom.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson was committing treason, a crime punishable by death, and he was asking his fellow countrymen to do the same. Similarly, King was asking people to follow him in breaking the law, taking the risk of going to jail or tolerating physical and verbal abuse. This, obviously, was not a simple task, but each was profoundly committed to their cause, and they never fell short of giving good reason for their strife. Both Jefferson and King used a significant amount of emotional and logical appeal, not necessarily to make their audience aware of their stance, but to sway them to feel the same and to take action. The style in which the Declaration of Independence was written was very formal and proper, and the emotional appeals are undertone to the logical facts that are stated about the tyrannical King of England. While the statement "He has...sent hither Swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their substance" was most likely meant to strike emotion in the colonists, it was stated in a very particular manner, which gave it a more logical appeal when read by one whom was not living in the colonies at that time. All of the statements made about the King placed strong emphasis on the fact that "HE" was the one responsible for these terrible acts on the colonies, and each statement was precisely constructed to appeal to different audiences in a different way. On the other hand, Dr. King is very direct when using emotional appeal. He used his greeting skillfully to disarm the clergymen who were responsible for his presence in jail, and then, to further build his character in their eyes, he says, "I feel that you are men of genuine good will and that your criticisms are sincerely set forth." As he progresses through the letter and shifts toward different audiences he uses emotional…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of the many rhetorical devices they used rhetorical questions many times in their speeches in order to regain focus from their listeners, and add extra emotion. Patrick Henry, the writer of the Speech in the Virginia Convention used many rhetorical questions throughout his writing. He asks questions such as, " Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? " Using this type of questioning he is able to state his opinion, and he doesn't allow much time for protest. It forces his listeners to think about the points he is making, and it usually persuades them into his point of view.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry in the speech, "Speech to the Virginia Convention" suggest that the American Colonists join his cause to fight against Britain in order to gain liberty. Henry uses many rhetorical devices in order to persuade the audience to join his fight. Some of the devices Henry uses include ethos, logos, pathos, allusions, and so on. Even though most of Henry's logic benefited him in persuading his audience, there were some parts of his logic where he exaggerated too much as well.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his speech, Patrick Henry created an image of enslavement and danger to tap into the uncertainties of the colonists. At the time of his address, Americans held disdain for the new British policies of taxes and government. Deriving what they believed a right for home rule, the Americans asked the crown for further freedom. He reminded the colonists that “we have petitioned, we have remonstrated, we have supplicated, we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of ministry and parliament.” Each sentence of the passage used by Henry started with “we have” and stated the various actions the colonists had taken to secure their rights from England. The parallel structure in those lines emphasized how the measures taken by Americans became more and more desperate as they transitioned from petitioning to prostrating. Henry’s argument reached its climax when he measured the final action equating to pleading on the floor to King George himself. In addition, he implemented images of the British slavery of the colonists to persuade them to battle England. He had the colonists “ask themselves how [the] gracious reception of [their] petition comported with [the] warlike preparations which covered [their] waters and darkened [their] land.” Henry used this argument to paint a contrasting picture of a peaceful and humble petition rejected by the punishment of armies to contain America. This punishment was represented in warfare that would “cover” and “darken” the colonies. Using this metaphor, the…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom VS Security

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Patrick Henry, an orator for freedom in the middle to late 1700’s, knew that liberty was a vital necessity in every man’s life, and that one must do whatever it takes, including sacrificing their security, in order to achieve it. In his speech to the Virginia House of Burgesses, he is most memorably quoted for his concluding antithesis, “Give me liberty, or give me death!” Henry conveyed to his audience, as well as the entire nation, that freedom is a virtue worth dying for. Mencken’s allegation fails to attribute this instance, even though Patrick Henry was able to convince a whole nation that their liberty was worth dying for.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays