Preview

Parliamentary Sovereignty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
659 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Parliamentary Sovereignty
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POLITICAL AND LEGAL SOVEREIGNTY * Political Sovereignty – lies with the people * Legal Sovereignty – vested in parliament * AV Dicey – the people hold political sovereignty and legal sovereignty is with the Queen in Parliament. * With a written constitution the constitution defines the limits of the government’s power * UK powers of the government - while dependent on the electoral mandate – is unconstrained by any fundamental document and subject to Parliament’s approval. * All law making power is derived from the sovereignty of the legislature: Parliament

ORIGINS OF PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY * 17th century – Crown and Parliament was in conflict * Crown ruled through royal prerogative rather that ruling through Parliament * Abuse of the prerogative by Charles I lead to civil war and Charles execution * Republican ruled for a decade under Oliver Cromwell * The monarchy was restored in 1660 * Conflicts followed over religion with James II placing RC in office * 1688 revolution – James II fled to France – Williams of Orange and his wife Mary assumed Crown * Long conflict ended * Williams and Mary came to the throne subject to conditions which ensured that Parliament had ultimate sovereignty and that the royal prerogative was subject to that supremacy * The Bill of Rights 1689, the settlement between the Crown and Parliament ensured Parliament Sovereignty
DISCUSS THE MEANING AND SCOPE OF PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY * The key to understanding Parliamentary Sovereignty lies in its acceptance by Judges who uphold Parliament Sovereignty * Sovereignty is a fundamental rule of the common law * As long as Judges accept the sovereignty of Parliament it would remain the ultimate rule of the constitution * The sovereignty of Parliament would only be lost under two conditions 1. If Parliament decided to abolish its sovereignty and place it under a written

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    parliament frq

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the execution of Charles I, Oliver Cromwell governed under a military dictatorship. He removed all Presbyterians from Parliament which created a Rump Parliament that voted to execute Charles and…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * The principle of government in the House of Commons was that government should represent the people.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Gov't

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sovereignty rests in Parliament, which consists of the House of Commons, the House of Lords, and the crown.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before evaluating whether or not Parliament is sovereign, it’s important to define what sovereignty means. Sovereignty can be split into two; political and legal. Legal sovereignty is the ultimate power to make laws which will be enforced within the state. Members of Parliament and the Prime Minister have ultimate legal power because they propose and enforce legislation. Citizens have no legal sovereignty because they don’t play a role in the legislative function even though pressure group activity may influence decisions. Political sovereignty is where real political power lies, and depending on the situation political sovereignty doesn’t always lie within Parliament. Critics have argued that due to recent changes, Parliament is no longer truly sovereign. This essay will assess the arguments for and against.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although the entrenchment of the Charter impacted the judiciary to become more powerful, but also through the concept of judicial supremacy as opposed to parliamentary supremacy. First of all, “ the concept of judicial supremacy does not focus on the specific act of review itself. Judicial supremacy refers to the “obligation of coordinate officials not only to obey that [judicial] ruling but to follow its reasoning in future deliberations” (qtd. Whittington. par: 12). Essentially, judicial supremacy allows judges to make any “ constitutional authority and stems directly from the 1982 Constitution Act”(Clio’s Current, par: 1). Whereas parliamentary supremacy refers to the legislative body being the supreme leaders, and law-makers in relationship…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The clash between the two political models of absolutism and constitutionalism is the catalyst for the progression in English politics. With William and Mary as their rulers, the Parliament didn’t need to worry about a Catholic ruler and even better they were able to get their rulers to recognize the Bill of Rights of 1689. Finally able to limit the power of the monarch, making the ruler subject to the law and the consent of Parliament, the theory of a constitutional monarchy was put into action through this bill. This is the beginning of England’s, later Great Britain, rise to being a world power and setting an example that others will soon…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Charles II was run out of England, William of Orange III and his wife Mary II became the new royalty of England. Under their reign, the Bill of Rights was created limiting the powers of the monarchy and secured the rights of the English nobles, or the parliament. The monarchy could not assert any dominance over the land without the clearance of the parliament, which only met every 3 years. With parliament being pressured by the population and the monarchy having restricted powers, democracy flourished. Public debates, freedom of speech, freedom of association all thrived. England became the example that political liberty did not have to compromise with military strength, which many countries who opposed absolutism could copy.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bill of Rights laid the foundation for a constitutional monarchy in England The country of England was moving into a more Protestant majority with democratic philosophies, so they were not in favor of King James II and the way he ruled. The king and the monarchy promoted the practices Catholicism, which was beginning to alienate most of English society. After king James’ death many hoped his daughter, Mary’s reign wouldfollow more of the Prostestant beliefs and tradtions, since she was married to Prince Willian of Orange. He was the current ruler of the Netherlands and a very powerful opposition to the Catholic king of France, Louis XIV.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the Charter in place, the courts could adjudicate not only upon the division of powers between different levels of government, but also upon the legality and constitutionality of laws enacted by Parliament and the provincial legislatures. Critics of judicial activism say that Supreme Court justices make law to arrogate themselves to a duty that only Parliament may legitimately perform. The Harper’s government afraids that the Supreme Court justices can override any law solely based on their personal opinions, and ultimately, there will be no laws before their eyes. Furthermore, the rulings of Supreme Court justices will serve as legal precedents that will provide guidance for other cases, thus, judicial activism becomes a more profound subject for those who serve on the Supreme…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bill of Rights of 1689

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It was result of mounting pressures to remind the King Charles I of the Rights laid out in the Magna Carta(1215) which he clearly challenged by dissolving the parliament and governing by decree. The concept of the “divine” right of the King was directly questioned in that document something that provoked the English Civil War. In the aftermath of the civil war the battle between the Parliament and the monarchy continued relentless.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the 17th century, the monarch had all three powers, the legislative, executive and judicial powers. The judiciary started gaining independence since the Case of Prohibitions 1607 and was fully independent after the Act of Settlement 1700, which effectively removed the power of the monarch to remove a judge at will. The independence of the legislature started with the Case of Proclamation 1611 and culminated in the Bill of Rights 1689, which curbed future arbitrary behaviour of the monarch and guaranteed Parliament’s power vis a vis the Crown. With these changes made to the UK constitution and as support grew for a democratic government, RP seemed out of place in the hands of the monarch and was slowly transferred into the hands of the government to be used in the name of the Crown.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Admin Law summary

    • 11264 Words
    • 46 Pages

     Allows for legislative process: King can only say Yay or Nay – can’t change…

    • 11264 Words
    • 46 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caribbean Jurisprudence

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In exercising their supreme and original right to establish the principles for their future government, the sovereign ‘people’ have chosen to organize their government into its various departments. One of these departments is the Judiciary – the Court itself. The Court therefore derives the authority to address the people created by the Constitution from that very instrument they themselves have uttered into existence in the exercise of their sovereign will. The Court is therefore a representative institution of the sovereign people – a necessary condition of political authority in a democratic polity.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Briefly, parliamentary sovereignty refers to the legislative supremacy of the UK Parliament. It means that there is no limit (apart from any self-imposed limit) on the capacity of the House of Commons, the House of Lords and the Crown to enact laws in the UK. The UK Parliament is the principal source of UK law.…

    • 5659 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays