Overcrowding Prison Case Study

The chart provides three alternative strategies of intervention to solve overcrowding prison, it was then isolated into four unique categories: Effectiveness. Equity, Political Acceptability and Financial Feasibility. Effectiveness: represent the option that would be the best in giving a solution to the overcrowding issue (Bardach, 2012, p. 50-52). Equity: represent the alternative that will that will most profit both the detainees and the general public (Bardach,2012, pg36). Political Acceptability: represent feasible, which may be insufficiently board or both insufficiently intense of both with the approval of Governor Andrew Cuomo (Bardach,2012, p.41). Financial Feasibility: represent the monetary condition of the option addressing if the
“Sentencing term for drug offenders range from 5 years to 20 years, contingent upon the sort and amount of the drug” Christopher Reinhart (2008). This would lessen the spending on prisoners that committed a minor violation. Another strategy will be set in place to send these wrongdoers to jail adversely affecting recidivism. As agreed by McVay at el, (2004), “(1) treatment appears to be cost effective, particularly when compared to incarceration, which is often the alternative. (2) Treatment costs ranged from a low of $1,800 per client to a high of approximately $6,800 per client”. Equity: The termination of mandatory sentencing will be beneficial to both detainees and New York City government. Political Acceptability: This alternative received a score of 1 for political acceptability. Mandatory sentencing may be within the suggested range, however could likewise be shorter or more, in view of the judge's discretion. As agreed by Mandatory Minimum Sentences stating that “a mandatory minimum sentence requires a judge to impose a statutorily fixed sentence on individual offenders convicted of certain crimes, regardless other mitigating factors”. Financial Feasibility: This is the most convincing alternative because of the high financial feasibility. This alternative program will be financial feasibility
This is lowest reasonable decisions of each of the three choices. This choice appears to lack financial feasibility. This decision will have the lowest financial related cost to accomplish the recovery proposals for detainees. This kind of choice requires an enormous spending, which, makes it significantly harder to acquire political acceptability.

Final Alternative: Expanding Good Time Credits appear to be the best options.

This alternative had a final score of 8, the high financial feasibility and effectiveness made this alternative the second best course of action. Adding to the diminished of the correctional facility populace without the prerequisite for a confounded and costly infrastructure. This alternative will give back to the community that has been harmed by a criminal act.

By ending mandatory sentencing for minor offenses, will be a powerful approach to decrease overcrowding prison, obtaining a final score of 10. By redirecting minor cases out of the criminal justice system, it could ensure that detainees will actually overcome their additive way by enrollment in treatment facilities rather than serving jail time, in which it is significant that minor offenses be set up in different