Organizational Commitment and Communication
Starbucks is committed to displaying leadership, power, and motivation within its organization. Howard Schultz the owner of Starbucks has worked hard to develop a beneficial program that would draw top people who were eager to work for Starbucks while displaying an act of commitment to excellence. This analysis will explain how different leadership styles would affect group communication in your chosen organization; analyze the different sources of power found in the organization and how might the different sources of power affect group and organization communication, identify the motivational theories that would be effective within that culture, evaluate the role of communication as an element of these theories, and describe the commitment of the workforce to the organization and their relationship to the organization’s communication. The leadership styles, power tactic, form of motivation and level of commitment all have a significant impact on the development of an organization. The way in which leaders communicate these methods plays a key role in the success of an organization (Robbins & Judge, 2007). Starbucks success is due to its great degree of it leaders and employees and their communication with each other and with its customers. The CEO of Starbucks, Howard Schultz is known for having a charismatic leadership style. Charismatic leaders tend to be more effective in his or her leadership style “because these leaders inspire lots of enthusiasm in their teams and are very energetic in driving others forward” (Mind Tools 1996). Possessing the Charismatic Leadership style, CEO Howard Schultz has enabled Starbucks to be one of the leading coffee retailers by being committed to communicate with its employees and create a rewarding and honest relationship. The transformational leadership style “has many similarities to the charismatic style. Transformational leaders provide a vision, seek high...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document