Preview

On Killing a Tree

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1055 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
On Killing a Tree
Search

George Orwell was then the sub-divisional police officer of the town of Moulmein in Burma. The Burmese people had a lot of anti-European feelings. They did not do anything in an organized purposeful way like a revolt or riot to express their hatred. But they did petty things like spitting betel juice over the dress of European women or jeering at Europeans at a safe distance. They hated Orwell a little more as he was a police officer, an agent of the oppressors. If a Burmese player did a foul against him in the football field, the Burmese referee ignored it and the crowd of spectators laughed in glee. The Buddhist priest jeered at him as at every other European. Orwell found their behaviours intolerable and he hated them for personal reasons. On the other hand, Orwell had a lot of sympathy for the oppressed people. Theoretically, he regarded Imperialism as evil. As a police officer, he had seen the tyranny and oppression of the British Empire in

Thus, Orwell was in a mental conflict. He was an officer of the Empire which he hated. He had to serve the Empire and be an agent of oppression. On the other hand, he hated the Burmese for personal reasons, though he was on their side and he had sympathy. So he hated his job and thought of giving it up. While in Moulmein once, he had to shoot an elephant needlessly. It was an incident, which showed the hollowness of the British Empire, and it also showed how the British people, who seemed to be so powerful, were actually powerless puppets. The elephant which was in must had ravaged a bazaar, destroyed a hut, eaten up the fruits of a fruit stall and killed a cow. Orwell went out with his .44 Winchester Rifle to frighten the elephant away with the sound of the gun. The Burmese could not give him any definite information about the whereabouts of the elephant. At last he heard a shout from a lane of thatched huts. He went there and saw that the elephant had killed a Dravidian coolie. He thought that the elephant might

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The main idea of the story “Shooting an Elephant" by Orwell is the effect of the oppressor is not only on the oppressed, but himself. There are several evidences found in the text to support the main idea. First, the author mentioned about the treatment of a European woman gets when she went to bazaars alone. This explained the freedom of security had been taken away. Since European had colonized Burma at that time, there was growing hatred toward European. Freedom to act also been seize when the narrator was expected to shoot an elephant even it’s not in his wiliness. In the story, Orwell had an inner struggle whether to kill the elephant or not. He taught that if the elephant were kept alive, it worth at least a hundred pound. However, if it were shot dead, its tusks only going to worth about five pounds. Moreover, he anthropomorphized the elephant by referring ‘it’ to ‘he’. He said, “It seems to be that it would be murder to shoot him.”(519) Plus, a life had been killed needs to be considered and there would be possibilities that the elephant will escape again, causing damage to the village. These reasons made Orwell to question his decision. Another crucial reasoning that drones the narrator to open fire is his identity as an Imperialist that control fellow Burmese. If he did not kill the elephant as the villagers expected, he would be viewed as a coward. This will further affect efforts to enforce law and coded in Burma. The narrator also described, ‘I perceived in this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroy,” to show an imperialist had to control or act as what had been expected. These conclude an oppressor would be affected when taking control of others.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One day Orwell was called out, because a tame elephant was ravaging the bazaar. With him he took his rifle, so he could protect him self, no intension of shooting the elephant. The Burmese couldn’t do anything against the elephant because they haven’t any weapons and the elephant’s mahout had taken the wrong direction and was therefore about twelve hours’ journey away.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Orwell was called to the market after a working elephant escaped his handler and killed a man. (Rule#2)By the time he arrived the scene, the elephant was calm and has wandered into an open area away from the market. Orwell did not want to kill the elephant because it was calm and caused no threat. (Rule#1)He had never intended to hurt the elephant, but with everyone watching, he felt as if he could not let them down. Orwell states, "They [the crowd] did not like me, but with the magical rifle in my hands I was momentarily worth watching" (86). Therefore, he pulled the trigger and killed the elephant. He was regarded as a wise ruler, but on the other hand, he knew that he was wrong in what he did. As a result, he finds himself doing whatever he must do, which in this case is to kill the elephant, to “avoid looking a fool”(89). (Rule#4)Orwell symbolizes himself as the British imperialists, who were the ruling authority in Burma, and the Burmese people as the elephant. Shooting the elephant is a symbolic of the English government 's relationship with the Burmese people.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Orwell does a great job conveying the message and feelings that he is trying to get across to the reader. He often calls Burmese the Natives”: “Here was I, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed native crowd” (412). Through this sentence, he shows his emotions and the respect he has for the Burmese. Because by calling them “natives” declares them the true owners of Burma instead of the British Empire. By using this diction in the essay frequently, Orwell reminds his readers of the imperialism living in Burma so the readers aren 't just hanging on to the death of the elephant so they also get the message inside of the essay.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay, George Orwell tells a story of what happened in Burma when he served as a police officer. At the time, the Burmese citizens did not look kindly upon the English police that protected their city. He describes several instances where he was ridiculed, taunted, and baited into precarious situations. He goes on to proclaim the cowardice of these citizens, and how they waited until the police were out of range before yelling insults towards them. It was because of this, that when faced with the task of controlling an elephant that became loose in the town, that he felt the need to kill the elephant. He killed the elephant, and he claims to have done so only to avoid looking like a fool.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orwell begins his essay by describing the intense hatred of the Burmese for their European masters. In Moulmein, in Lower Burma, I was hated by large numbers of people, the only time in my life that I have been important enough for this to happen to me. Europeans were spit at, jeered at, and insulted. As a police officer I was an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First, Orwell begins his story with frequent use of carefully-chosen diction to indicate the young policeman’s hatred and also sympathy toward the Burmese. When he describes he was always “an obvious target” to those Burmese who hated the British Empire, he writes:…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    .......George Orwell immediately begins the essay by first claiming his perspective on British Imperialism.George Orwell was “disgusted by the inhumanity of colonial rule that he witnessed while stationed in Burma” .He notes that the Burmese civilians were not allowed to own guns during his stay – a testament of British control over Burmese resources. He claims that it is evil and he is fully against the oppressors, the British. Though he is a British officer himself at the time in Burma, he feels a certain hatred and guilt towards himself, his empire, and the “evil-spirited little beasts,” the Burma people.Secretly, though, he agreed with them, and he knew that the government he was working for was unfairly oppressing the Burmese. As he says in his essay, "imperialism was an evil thing," and he was "all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British". Feeling “stuck between his hatred of the empire he served and his rage against the evil-spirited little beasts who tried to make his job impossible” he knew that “the sooner he chucked up the job and got out of it the better”.Orwell repressed his emotions because acting out as the only white man would have been foolish. If he betrayed his country, he risked treason. If he sided with the Burmese, he would never fit into their culture. Every white man’s life long struggle in the East was to not be laughed at, so the safest choice for a man like George was to live without action. However, when a sexually aggressive elephant gets loose Orwell is called to take action.. In the essay he writes not just about his personal experience with the elephant but how metaphorical the experience is to Imperialism and his views on the matter. Orwell’s feelings are the hostile feelings toward the British, Imperialism, and Britain's justification for their actions in taking over Burma.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In George Orwell's “Shooting an Elephant,” deals with the evil side of imperialism. The shooting of the elephant in Orwell's story is the central focus from which Orwell builds his argument through the two dominant characters, the elephant and the British officer. The British officer, acts as a symbol of the imperial country and the elephant is the victim of imperialism. Together, the solider and the elephant turns this into an attack on the evils of imperialism. The shooting of the elephant shows the different aspects of imperialism. The elephant and the British officer help to show the real nature of imperialism. The shooting of the elephant is the incident that reveals that imperialism inflicts damage on both parties in a imperialistic relationship.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First, Orwell hesitates several times before he takes aim at the elephant. It was never his will to kill the elephant. Orwell states, “ I had no intention of shooting the elephant- I had merely sent for the rifle to defend myself if necessary- and it is always unnerving to have a crowd following you.” Also when he saw the elephant his first reaction was that it should not be shot. Orwell states, “As soon as I saw the elephant I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him.” (Orwell, 186) He states that the elephant is a very expensive animal and that its work is very important to the Burmese population and the family that owns it. Orwell watches the elephant and wants yet another reason to pull the trigger. He makes sure it does not turn savage and even states that it looked no more dangerous than a cow.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before becoming a writer, Orwell was a youthful imperial policeman in India during the control of the British Raj. Throughout the duration of his stay, he had to witness ineffable, cruel things that the British enforcers thrust upon the exploited who were the Burmese. However, he also had to face the hideous taunts of the indigenous civilians. Without a clue of the inevitable demise of the British Empire, he was stuck between “between his hatred of the empire he served and his rage against the evil-spirited little beasts who tried to make his job impossible” (Orwell 285). In the end, Orwell’s view was just a part of the bigger…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Five Moral Spheres

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Although, Orwell pulled the trigger, the driving force was the Burmese people. This shows he didn’t give importance to harm, fairness and purity after all. For once, Orwell just wanted to be respected as the officer of the law, rather than the outsider. Orwell loses his morals for his desire to feel…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    He illustrates his experiences as a police officer in Burma, and uses those experiences to expose the real nature of imperialism. He wants people to sympathize and feel the emotions associated with his experiences. In this essay, Orwell states how the Burmese people treated him as a sub-divisional police officer. He writes, “As a police officer I was an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so. When a nimble Burman tripped me up on the football field…the crowd yelled with hideous laughter…In the end the sneering yellow faces of young men that met me everywhere, the insults hooted after me…none of them seemed to have anything to do except stand on the street corner and jeer at Europeans”(1). This shows that Orwell was constantly criticized and mocked by the natives. The Burmans have the power to manipulate Orwell, he opposes the British government and supports the natives, but yet their insults and jeering causes him to feel disgust towards them. Orwell uses language to show the people the resentment imperialism caused him to feel. Imperialism impacts Orwell’s life on a personal manner, it causes internal conflict, making him feel torn between his occupation as an officer and his…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eric Arthur Blair, who used the pen name George Orwell, was a British writer whose literature is marked by criticism of social injustice. The essay “Shooting an Elephant” is one of George Orwell’s most well-known works. The essay was wrote in 1936, it describes a story what happened in 1926, while Orwell was working as a British police officer in Burma, where in order to build the role of an assertive police officer and a brave white man, he has to shoot an aggressive elephant. He is conflicted with his character as a white, male officer and the morality deep inside his heart. Meanwhile he has to compare the influences of his act in local culture and his own culture, and he uses the story of shooting an elephant as a metaphor for the relation between the ruler and the colony. In other words, the decision to shoot the elephant was affected by the political condition, the conflicting culture, and his attitude of imperialism.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As Orwell goes to the neighborhood where the elephant was last spotted as he searching Orwell gets conflicting reports own the elephant whereabouts.Orwell thinks the claims are fake and head back.As he start to head back he hears a commotion nearby and rounds a corner to find a “coolie” lying dead as he sees the dead person lying own the ground he orders a subordinate to bring him a gun strong enough to shoot an elephant.he walk to the last know location of the elephant with gun in had a large group from the neighborhood follows him and are excited to see the beast shot this however makes Orwell uncomfortable,he did not want to shot elephant he only had the gun to protect himself.As Orwell spots the elephant he understands that he should not shoot it and Orwell makes up his mind to simply watch the elephant to make sure it does not become aggressive again but, after looking behind him a very large crowd whom are excitedly expecting to see the elephant’s demise are watching.Orwell feels as though he is a magician tasked with entertaining them this complied him to shoot the elephant his inability to resist the crowd’s makes Orwell realize that his authority is a hollow sort of power.Which make him become an imperialist, cannot do anything controlled by the crowd of blood lust people,still he does not want to kill the beast as it appears “grandmotherly”however Orwell still kills the elephant he uses this experience of shooting the elephant as a metaphor for his experience with…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays