Preview

Oligopoly

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Oligopoly
TV dilemma

How to become an oligopoly firm in soft drink market?
(source: "A new-age drink war starts as Soda Flops," Time, December 18, 2000
There are many soft drinks in the market, yet the main suppliers of popular soft drinks are only two: Coke and Pepsi. The soft drink market in America is a very big business with annual sales of $58 billion. Coke, with its patented Coca Cola drink, enjoys the dominant role in the soft drink market, and runner-up Pepsi is always challenging Coke for the top spot. In recent years, American consumers' preferences for soft drinks was changing from carbonated to non-carbonated soft drinks such as fruit juices or teas. This shift in taste gave Pepsi an excellent chance to challenge Coke. Pepsi purchased food giant Quaker Oats for $13 billion. Quaker Oats produces, in addition to Quaker oatmeal, a very popular non-carbonated soft drink called Gatorade with an annual sales of $2 billion. Pepsi also purchased a popular tonic called SoBe for $370 million. With these additions to its popular Tropicana orange juice, Pepsi now can challenge Coke at least in the non-carbonated soft drink market. Coke belatedly rose to Pepsi's challenge, experimenting with 100 different non-carbonated soft drinks. Thus, with rapidly changing consumer tastes at work in the modern economy, an economic hierarchy of firms is constantly challenged and often changed. To maintain the oligopoly position, a firm must continue to expand by merger or diversification. More importantly, the firm must constantly search for the changing pattern of consumer taste and immediately adapt to it. Otherwise, a mammoth firm of yesterday simply becomes a dinosaur of today.
Did they buy out Pepsi yet? If not then they are not a monopoly. Are there a lot of competitors about the same size as Coke and Pepsi? If not then they are not a monopolistic competition. If these two have ruled out the other options then they must be an oligopoly, unless they are not an -opoly of any

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Having said that, there is still a point where price is not the issue but taste. Some people swear by the taste in this loyal brand market. These two corporations have concentrated on cultivating brand management through applicable advertising, marketing campaigns. According to Bloomberg BusinessWeek, “Coca-Cola remains the best globally recognized brand across all industries for ages, while PepsiCo’s brand ranked number 26 in year 2008.” PepsiCo has been able differentiate itself from competitors by tapping into other markets like chips and healthy alternative foods. While PepsiCo is known for their soda, their expansion is clear in showing there is a need for other things being non-soda. The time for vitality comes with diversification because there are true signs of a shift in consumption. The decrease in soda consumption raises PepsiCo. has positioned it to continue to remain profitable for its shareholders.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    03.11 Oligopoly

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    b. 0 points; The student failed to state that the demand curve is price elastic and that MR is positive, so TR rises if P is decreased.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Oligopoly is defined as a market structure in which there are a few major firms dominating the market for a specific product or service.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Monopolistic Competition

    • 13788 Words
    • 56 Pages

    more difficult than under pure competition but not nearly as difficult as under pure monopoly.…

    • 13788 Words
    • 56 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coke and Pepsi are two big players in the market. The competition in the market has been such in which one company goes ahead with some new product and other company adopts a proactive approach and it comes up with something new that no one takes the advantage, Because of the customer base and the market share they affect the profit of the…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cadbury Crush Case

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to Exhibit 5, from 1985-1989, Orange crushes’ market share decreased from 22% (1985) to 8% (1989), this data shows that prior to the entrance of Coca Cola’s Slice and Pepsi’s Minute Maid, Orange Crush had more of the market share which at the time, they were positioned toward groups between the ages of 13-40. Since 1985, Crush repositioned itself to target individuals between the ages of 12-17. Appendix D shows that Pepsi Co. and Minute Maid entered the market with their own orange soda brands capturing a large portion of the orange soda market. These new juggernaut competitors reduced Crush’s market share consistently each year by positioning themselves in the 15-30 year old market. Initially, we thought it would be wise for Crush to revert back to its’ original target market, however with the emergence of Pepsi Co.’s Slice and Coca Cola’s Minute Maid into the market, and the fact that both brands are targeting individuals roughly between the ages of 15-30 (Crushes’ previous target market) (Exhibit 8), we believe it would be best for Crush to make an adjustment to their current positioning strategy. Shifting from their current age range (teens 12-17)(Exhibit 13) to younger children between the ages of 6-16 would tap into a market segment not currently being pursued by the new dominant Orange Soda companies. This shift would differentiate Crush even further from their competition, and as a result lead to more market share capture potential and competitive advantage due to the fact that they will be the first major orange soda brand to enter into this new target market. Secondly, the alignment with a younger age bracket…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Five Forces (Coke Wars)

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The soft drink industry can be described as a Duopoly since Pepsi and Coke are the two firms competing. The market share of the rest of the industry is too small to be a factor. The competition between the companies has never…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1886, the Coca Cola Company was developed but it wasn 't until 1898 that the fierce competitor Pepsi-Cola entered into the market. These 2 companies are the two major players that dominate the consumer beverage (soft-drink) industry. Coke and Pepsi have since been competing to rein the global market in consumer beverages. The market of drinks in the United States alone is valued at more than thirty million dollars annually. With the growth of these two companies, PepsiCo has developed and acquired additional products outside the scope of just the consumer beverage industry, these products have helped the company to increase their exposure and position in the global market. This has not been the case for the Coca Cola Company; they have tried and have failed numerous times at expanding their product and marketing capabilities. Below is a list of key products offered by both Coca Cola and PepsiCo:…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oligopolistic market

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An oligopoly is a market dominated by a few producers each of whom has some degree of market…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Two major detriments to Coca-Cola’s strategy of expansion into non-carbonated beverages may be the impact of society’s recent economic uncertainty and increased health awareness. Such beverages may be considered luxuries. Although pricing might be competitive, in today’s economic uncertainty individuals may prefer a variety of beverages that offer better nutritional value vice purchasing Coca-Cola’s soda beverages. It is my opinion; Coca-Cola has strategically…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Historically, the soft carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry has been valued at $74 billion in the United States. In order to understand the reasons why the industry has been hugely profitable despite the ‘Cola Wars’, an examination of the CSD industry with Porter’s five forces analysis will be conducted. As market leaders, the analysis will be centred on both Coke and Pepsi (hereafter “C&P”).…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola Wars Continue

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Soft drink industry is profitable because the industry has concentrated revenues between 2 major players and it is virtually impossible for a new player to compete with the key players. The industry giant's wield power over the retail outlets. Convenience stores, vending machines, fountains are widely distributed and hence they don't have the power to bargain over pricing issues and they also contribute to about 80 of the sales. This ensures that the companies quote a maximum price and still have the final say in the matter.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monopolies

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I consider the case of Qualcomm faces antitrust probe in china. Qualcomm Incorporated is an American global fabless semiconductor company that designs, manufactures and markets digital wireless telecommunications products and services. In the article it states that Qualcomm is the world’s biggest makers of cellar phone chips so they wanted to merge companies with china due to the potential market growth china has compared to the United States. So the speculation of this deal is that the company in china and qualcomm plan to do a launch of TD-LTE by early 2014. This causing an issue simply because it seems as though they broke the antitrust violations; in the article it does not say what violation it is but my thought from reading it would be the Celler-Kefauver Act which states that the Clayton Act, Section 7, which prohibits a firm from merging with a competing firm (and thereby lessening competition) by acquiring its stock. The issue seems to the rise of a company in which other companies would suffer from the merge taking down competitions and so forth. From the article we can tell that with any company trying to succeed in the business world especially a company that makes cellphone chips comes into a merger with china then the production and economic profits is unimaginable. China is one of the world’s leading productions in products worldwide now combing that with the cell phone chip makers, no other company would dare go against them or even try to keep with the company. The Marginal Revenue or Marginal Cost will skyrocket in competition. If the merger occurs it would call a Deadweight Loss to Society meaning that the costs to society created by market inefficiency and loss occur when supply and demand are not in equilibrium.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monopoly & Monopolistic

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is uncommon that a firm will go to a monopoly after being a monopolistic company. But as we dig deeper there can be some advantages as with anything there are disadvantages to the government, companies and society. As stated in our text the definition of the monopolistic is as follows, “A common form of industry (market) structure in the United States, characterized by a large number of firms, no barriers to entry, and product differentiation” (Case, pg. 304). When we look at a monopolistic company indicates that there are multiple types of the same type or similar companies that create the same product(s). This tends to be a common theme here in America. Wonks changed to a monopoly firm which resulted in ““An industry with a single firm that produces a product for which there are no close substitutes and in which significant barriers to entry prevent other firms from entering the industry to compete for profits” (Case, pg. 262). In a monopoly firm there is one main firm that manufactures the product and nobody else can replicate the product.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soft drink industry needs huge amount of money to spend on advertisement and marketing. In 2000, Pepsi, Coke and…

    • 2532 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics