Olaudah Equiano

The Two Sides of Man Olaudah Equiano and Thomas Paine dispute the belief that Britain is more civilized than the countries it has colonized. Equiano is able to subtly assert his argument by disguising himself as “an unlettered African” who is a “most obedient, And devoted humble Servant” to Britain, but actually views himself and his culture as equivalently or exceedingly superior to that of the Britain society (Equiano v). In his autobiography, The Interesting Life of Olaudah Equiano (1789), he strategically links between Africa and Western cultures showing how Africans are more civilized and superior to Britons through his recollections of Africa and his current observations of Britain. He is able to manipulate his message by identifying
Equiano argues that the slave trade in his culture uses slaves that are convicted of “heinous” crimes or are “only prisoners of war,” whereas the Britons practice kidnapping as the main mode of obtaining slaves (Equiano 3). By describing the slaves from his homeland as criminals or enemies, he is minimizing the value of their lives and makes it seem less harsh than the capture of British slaves, but he is using the same reasoning as the Briton do to validate their participation in the slave trade. Additionally, he refers to them as “fellow creatures,” which dehumanizes the captured people and takes them to even a lower level below the criminals (Equiano 5). Additionally, he makes comparisons to the “condition” of treatment for his country’s slaves “from that of the slaves in the West Indies!” (Equiano 4). He is comparing how the British who are considered enlightened, treat their slaves like animals and looks to them as disposable property; whereas, his society gives their slaves enough respect to treat them humanely in a civilized manner. He tries to make slavery in his homeland seem less oppressive by describing the slaves as doing “no more work than any other member of the community” and “their food, clothing, and lodging” were basically the same as everyone else (Equiano 5). He stresses that some of the slaves “have even slaves under them as their own property,” which ignores the fact that these people are still enslaved and are there against their free will. Equiano fails to denounce the participation in the slave trade in his homeland and uses class status as an excuse for slaveholding. Interestingly, he does not argue for the freedom of the slaves in this section, but focuses only on the brutal treatment of them. He questions why the ancestors of the Britons who were