cons and pros of the punishment will justify the punishment.
Then put thesis statemtnt…
.
Oedipus’ crown did not put him above his royal decree of banishment for murder.
Is was the punishment justifiable given the crime? Try to put this in a statement
Nature of crime and punishment: mitigating circumstances
Punishement was banishment….. Oedipus personal punishment driven by guilt was to gouge out his eyes.
Is his own guilt punishment enough?
In the play Oedipus goes on a search to get rid of the plague, he then figures out some news that was not good. Without listening to the prophecies Tiresas warned him about. Oedipus is the killer he then takes his oath but adds a physical pain that would not let him see for the rest of his life+JOIN THESE THEY ARE ABOUT THE SAME THING! +The basic reason for Oedipus to search for Laius’ killer. To put a stop to the horrific plague, the plague would come to an end when the murderer is dead or drive out of the land( 270-285). When
Oedipus finds out he is the murderer of Laius the oath he made about the banishment was the only
Option? PRO why should Oedipus crown put him above his decree.
Oedipus’ punishment, of anger he then stabs his eyes repeatedly with Jocasta’s (wife/mother) dress pins WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT this was his free will ? Trying to escape all the horror he faced. He will no longer see the faces of his children or his subject in the kingdom. Oedipus’ punishment was stabbing out his eyes actually his punishment or was it due to his internal struggles? that he did was not the only one he did, I think Oedipus intended to do some physical damage to himself. The pain of the punishment he did was to prove that he was finished with what he had seen and how is done with everything. Oedipus then took his pride and power and blinded himself for finding the truth that he was the murderer of king Laius. Part of your conclusion or discussion may a better place for it!
Pride was Oedipus’ life. The events that had happened which led to his becoming of the king. He continues on this way of life and Oedipus becomes more powerful and his pride grows. Oedipus does not stop at anything. He figures out that not only he killed his father; he slept with his own mother. He gets stripped out of his pride. He has been crushed, that it drives him to physical pain.
What is Oedipus being punished for? Maybe for killing Laius; how could someone get punished for being a victim to the prophecies? (FREE WILL? FATALIST? This could be an argument for con. Mitigating circumstances) Oedipus knows that the actions were not his choice but the gods had the choice to make for him “My god, my god-what have you planned to do to me?” effectively just elimates free will… so was his blinding himself an act of free will? Or was it part of his destiny as laid out by the gods?(814) this quote did show that Oedipus knew he had no choice in the actions. He knew being punished was the best for his kingdom to save his subjects.
Conclusion
• Repeat the thesis statement: nature of crime punishment
2 or 3 brief sentences concerning the arguments
Closing statement concerning the arguesments and what the answer to thesis question/statements is
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
As the play progresses, Oedipus begins to question his own involvement, because he has had an incident that happened to him that sounds like what happened to Laius. At one point Oedipus and Jocasta have a conversation about the murder of Laius. “I came across a group escorting an older man in a horse-drawn carriage… Then, as I fought on, I killed the rest.”(17) Oedipus starts to think that he is the murderer of Laius, because of the event that happened to him. People have heard that there was multiple thieves that were there when Laius was murdered. As he explains to Jocasta what happened at the cross road, he expresses guilt and fear. Jocasta tells him not to assume anything. “Oedipus I'll send for the shepherd now. His testimony will ease…
- 182 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Together they have four children, and Oedipus' dire fate had been fulfilled, all without his knowledge. Problems begin with a plague that ravages the city of Thebes and Oedipus sets out to find the cause of Laius’s death. At length, he discovers that he himself is the cause for he was guilty of both patricide and incest. When that realization is manifested, the utter shock and disgust of the horrific situation causes the tormented and disillusioned Oedipus to blind himself of a self-inflicted.…
- 1552 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
It is debatable as to whether Oedipus deserved what happened to him at the end of the play, some would argue that Oedipus did deserve his fate by the end; however, in my opinion Oedipus did not deserve what happened to him because he was doing his job as king and trying to save his people from the plague.…
- 632 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The first half of the play, “Oedipus the King” is mainly about the King of Thebes and his quest to save his land from a plague that has caused serious damage. Oedipus became king due to his earlier triumph of saving Thebes from the curse of the Sphinx. His people now rely on him to once again save the land from its misery.…
- 967 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
When Oedipus realized that he may have committed the very crime he is trying to solve, he says “I think that I myself may be accurst by my own ignorant edict.” (Pg. 40) Here, he even finds himself ignorant. Oedipus was unknowing of many things prior to this discovery; one which was who did it. Who killed Laius? When he found out it was himself it all fell into place. Oedipus killed his father and was sleeping with/had children with his mother. Ignorance was the only way for him. Ignorance was the best…
- 513 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“ I hate the murders who killed my father. O, can this be justice, ( pg 128 ).” Oedipus finds out that he has murdered Laius, who was his father, and that he married his mother. The plot goes on to describe how he came about doing such horrific things. At first, Oedipus seems to be the villain, but it can't be so, because he did not know that he was adopted, and that the person he killed was his father. of course, he didn't know that he is marrying his mother either. A prophet named Teiresias enters next and Oedipus asks him for help discover who has killed Laius. However, the prophet is extremely reluctant to speak and begs Oedipus to let him go without saying what he knows. He then gives him some disturbing news, that Oedipus is the person whom he seeks and who killed Laius. Oedipus does not want to listen and calls the prophet a liar and a traitor, even saying that Creon, who sent him, was the designer in a plot against him to gain the throne. The prophet warns Oedipus that even if he doesn't want to hear the truth, it does not make it any less truth that he speaks. Several characters are willing to sacrifice themselves to save Thebes from destruction or for what they believe is right and just. Creon, for example, is ready to die in order to save the city. Teiresias offers to have himself killed when Oedipus suspects him of betraying the trust of…
- 1178 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
So we can see that because of Oedipus' excessive pride and determination to avoid his 'fate', he walked straight into it. He even mocks the fact that Tiresius is blind because in line 353 and 354, Oedipus says to Tiresius, "If you could see, I should have said the deed was yours alone. We can see this when he is talking to Creon, asking him to take him into exile (lines1525-1533). When avenging Jocasta's previous husband, and his true father, King Laius' death, he was blinded by his pride to the concept that perhaps he was the murderer. Now Oedipus not only sees how the prophecy was played out, but also is able to look beyond the surface of things. As the very last statement from the Chorus says, "we must wait, and see his end, scrutinize his dying day, and refuse to call him happy till he has crossed the border of his life without p!ain. law of Oedipus excessive pride, or 'hubris. This I do not see as a downfall, because had he not realized his fate, he would have lived in ignorant bliss for the rest of his life. Then, when Tiresius still declines to tell Oedipus of his fate, Oedipus starts to accuse Tiresius as being the one who killed Laius. He had fulfilled the prophecy because of his own actions, which he had believed were beneficial. His pride of conquering the Sphinx led him to the marriage of Jocasta, his mother. However, other events opened his eyes to the tragedy, which had taken place http://www.megaessays.com/viewpaper/6780... ---------------- He was blinded (not literally) by his ego. His pride made him so conceited that he could not see beyond, and could not see to his past to learn from it. He committed the opposite mistakes as his father, whom he killed, his father believed too much in others; he didn't and believed too much in his own self but in a negative way. It wasn't that he knew who he really was but that he was who he wanted to believe he was and could not see past that image.…
- 669 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Oedipus tries to find the murderer of Laios only to discover that he himself is the killer. Both are very prosperous to begin with and would have lived long and comfortable lives if they had just left well enough alone. But these two teach us a lesson because they both are removed from a place of superiority at the end of the plays. However, there are some big differences between the two and how they fall.…
- 728 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Oedipus, who was “sick at soul” eventually “tore the brooches from the robe of his dead wife and ground the pins into his eyes” (Bennet, Kerr, 3). As a result of this action, it is shown that Oedipus, filled with guilt and shame, imposes his own punishment on himself by abolishing his sense of sight. Through this, Oedipus clearly demonstrates how high the degree of remorse he feels is. On the contrary, when Creon becomes informed of the deaths of his own son and wife, he asks aloud “Is there no sword for me, to end this misery?” (Sophocles, 16). In this scene, Creon wishes to end his misery by killing himself as well, but as the story comes to a conclusion, it is speculated that Creon in fact, does not sentence himself to death. He imposes to only to be led away, to dwell for the remainder of his life in his own kingdom. It is here, that the true distinction between Oedipus and Creon shows. Oedipus, undeniably showing more remorse brings blindness and exile upon himself, compared to Creon, who only decides to reside within his home to live forever in sorrow. Unmistakably, through their self-imposed retributions, Oedipus demonstrates a higher level of remorse when compared to…
- 923 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Oedipus is a little slower, and thinks, “Perhaps she’s upset to find out I'm not really of royal blood.” The flaw in his character represents less a vicious want and more a vulnerability, or a blind spot. He therefore traveled to the oracle of Delphi, who did not answer him, but did tell him he would murder his father and sleep with his gentry. After Tiresias leaves, Oedipus lower Creon with death or exile for concur with the prophet. As proof, she notes that the Delphic oracle once told Laius he would be murdered by his son, when in fact his son was cast out of Thebes as a baby, and Laius was murdered by a bit of steam.…
- 562 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In conclusion, Oedipus’ search for justice helps the work as a whole by showing that “Oedipus Rex” is not all about injustice. This helps the reader understand that Oedipus was a good man who could not escape a terrible prophecy. Due to Oedipus’ honest character, the reader never questions the integrity of Oedipus. The reader is left with the impression of a great man who greatly suffered despite his good…
- 484 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout the play of Oedipus the King, Oedipus and other members of the play makes some decisions that ultimately decide Oedipus’s fate. Some of Oedipus’s decisions are a result from an oracle, but his personal decisions ultimately lead to his fall to death. His decisions of running away from his home kingdom, pushing the oracle to speak more, and searching for the shepherd that knew where Oedipus came from leads to Oedipus’s fate.…
- 567 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“The one in the lead and the old man himself were about to thrust me off the road –brute force– and the one shouldering me aside, the driver, I strike him in anger! – and the old man, watching me coming up along his wheels –he brings down his prod, two prongs straight at my head!” (888-893) In Oedipus’ description, he did nothing to provoke the attack. Laius and his men acted violently towards Oedipus for absolutely no reason and he was justified in defending himself. If the old king had not partaken in threatening actions towards Oedipus, he probably would not have been killed. I believe this is related to Laius and Jocasta’s riddance of Oedipus because had they kept and raised him, this particular situation would not have occurred. On that day, Laius and Oedipus would have met at the same crossroads and they would’ve recognized each other as father and son; There wouldn’t have been viscous actions leading to fighting and the death of…
- 1156 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Greek tragedy Oedipus the King by Sophocles is a play about a Greek emperor who was brought to ruin and had no one to blame other then his character. This Greek emperor embodied all traits' a ruler in his position would be blessed to have. Oedipus was a compassionate honest man who cared for the people he lead. Even as wonderful of a leader as he was, Oedipus was brought to his ruin because of his anger, impatience and blindness of fate.…
- 800 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Oedipus curses the unknown murderer and swears he will find and punish him. He orders the people of Thebes, under punishment of exile, to give any information they have about the death of Laius. Then, Oedipus sends for Tiresias, the blind prophet, to help with the investigation. When Tiresias refuses to tell Oedipus what he has seen in his prophetic visions Oedipus accuses Tiresias of playing a part in Laius’s death. Tiresias grows angry and says that Oedipus is the cause of the plague—he is the murderer of Laius. As the argument escalates, Oedipus accuses Tiresias of plotting with Creon to overthrow him, while Tiresias hints at other terrible things that Oedipus has done. Convinced that Creon is plotting to overthrow him, Oedipus declares his intention to banish or execute his brother-in-law. Jocasta and the chorus believe Creon is innocent and beg Oedipus to let Creon go. He relents, reluctantly, still convinced of Creon’s guilt. Jocasta tells Oedipus not to put any stock in what prophets and seers…
- 434 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays