Preview

Nuclear Bomb Persuasive Speech

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1172 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Bomb Persuasive Speech
7 November 2013
The Hemorrhage None Can Staunch The sunny morning of August 6, 1945 greeted the city of Hiroshima, Japan with the radiance of any other normal day; the cloudless sky and its forget-me-not blue casted an aura of heavenly peace over its three hundred and fifty thousand inhabitants. That peaceful heaven, however, was about to be obliterated by a destructive new weapon created by the United States of America. That morning, the first nuclear bomb ever created was deployed over Hiroshima. Its virtually unimaginable power obliterated the entire city along with forty percent of its population within seconds. America succeeded in creating the most destructive weapon mankind had ever seen, and it gave birth to a most evil type
…show more content…
This country possesses about one hundred weapons of mass destruction; this would be enough to wipe every major city of the U.S. off the map within seconds. Mr. Cirincione believes that the main issue in this country is Al Qaeda gaining access to these weapons and using them to carry out their evil plans, “What happens if the [Pakistan’s] government falls or the army splinters? Who gets the weapons? Or the scientist who know how to build the weapons, or the material for the weapons?” (Kanani. par.12). Mr. Cirincione is also the author of the book Bomb Scare: The History and Future of Nuclear Weapons, and here he claims that it is almost impossible for a terrorist to manufacture the materials to create nuclear weapons, unless they take them by force:
Nor can terrorist groups build a bomb from scratch, they cannot manufacture the highly enriched uranium (HEU) or plutonium necessary for the bomb’s core, this requires substantial industrial facilities beyond the capacity of any of such group. But they can steal the uranium or plutonium, or buy it from corrupt officials. If terrorists could buy or steal 25 kg of highly enriched uranium, a well-organized group could probably also obtain the necessary technical expertise to fashion a gun-assembly type bomb, similar to the Hiroshima bomb
…show more content…
Mr. Richard Turco, an atmospheric scientist, claims that: “detonating between 50 and 100 [nuclear] bombs - just 0.03% of the world 's arsenal - would throw enough soot into the atmosphere to create climactic anomalies unprecedented in human history” (Jhan. par. 3). At this moment it is believed that Pakistan and North Korea have close to 130 warheads of mass destruction under their possession. The detonation of their weapons alone would be enough, to make Mr. Turco’s discoveries a reality. Therefore disarming these two countries is definitely a priority, mostly because both governments are very unstable, and in the case of North Korea it is not a secret that they have attempted plans against the safety of the entire humanity with such arsenals, but even though the United Nations, and the IAEA are doing everything in their power to stop Pakistan and North Korea from manufacturing and initiating a nuclear war by condemning both countries to pay gigantic sanctions, both countries have continued to create such weapons.
In conclusion, the fact that these two countries possess such destructible power not only puts in danger the lives of those who inhabit the places where these arsenals are deployed, but the entire planet earth. Meanwhile, people around the world can only wait in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    BREAKING NEWS- President Truman had been warned about invading Japan, and the terrific casualties they were capable off. However since they were afraid of attacking our soil, he ordered for a weapon large enough and powerful enough in hopes of bringing this all to an end. On August 6th, 1945 a five ton-bomb was dropped in the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The bombing killed 80,000 people; the city wasn’t left in great shape as well. Although the devastating outcome, we believe that this is the last of the feuding between them and us. (P.2, http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/atomic-bomb-dropped-on-hiroshima). The atomic bombs are scary, and threating to all nations. Sadly we believe this has both ended problems we have been facing, but also…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “On the morning of August 6, 1945, the American B-29 Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later another B-29, Bock’s Car, released one over Nagasaki. Both caused enormous casualties and physical destruction.” (Maddox 1). These disastrous events have weighted upon the American conscience ever since that day in history. Even though there are some people that disagree with the dropping of the atomic bomb, President Truman’s decision was very critical because he prevented the loss of many American lives, Japanese soldiers fought with no notion of ever surrendering, and it brought an end to a bloody war.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Three...two...one…¡#@%^! Instantly, 80,000 are dead (Hall). Near the end of World War II on August 6th of 1945, American B-29 aircraft Enola Gay dropped the world’s first atomic bomb, ‘Little Boy,’ on the unsuspecting city of Hiroshima, Japan. Tens of thousands of civilians were instantly killed from the explosion and as time passed, the death toll almost doubled due to exposure to radiation and other aftereffects from the bomb (LeMay & Tibbets). To this day, historians debate over very controversial ideas concerning the attack. Many people justify the use of the nuclear bombs by reasoning that the attack was what broke Japan’s spirit and ended the war. Consequently, one of the debates is over whether or not the Japanese surrendered as…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first week of August 1945, the world saw the first and only use of nuclear weapons in warfare. America’s use of the atomic bombs on Japan, resulted in the death of over 130,000 people and caused unpredicted effects on physical health. In relation today we face ongoing issues of terrorism and the possibility of dirty bombs being deployed in the U.S. The problem is the U.S. government has an inadequate system for preventing the wrong…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, President Truman addressed the American people, informing them that one of the most influential events in history had occurred, “Sixteen hours ago an American airplane dropped one bomb on Hiroshima,...That bomb had more power than 20,000 tons of TNT...which is the largest bomb ever yet used in the history of warfare”. By the summer of 1945, millions of soldiers and citizens of the world had died after years of fighting in the Second World War. Although Europe’s involvement in the war had come to an end, the War in the Pacific between the United States and Japan had not found its conclusion. The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki have come to be among the most debatable events in history. While some argue that because the bombings ended World War II, more lives of both American and Japanese soldiers were saved then there were victims of the bombs; others argue that more measures could have been attempted in order to possibly preventing the need for the bombs. The argument that the dropping of the bombs have prevented possible future wars from occurring has been made. However, the lasting environmental and social effects of the bomb have left…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If some other country was to obtain these weapons and we had none, we would be at their mercy. There are a lot of maniacs out there who have the ability to rise to power and gain support, just like Hitler, Stalin, or Mussolini did. Once these kinds of leaders gain power, they can obtain nuclear weapons. Even though none of them did, they had the power to, and the only reason they didn’t is because they didn’t live in the nuclear age. However, we were still watching these leaders to make sure they weren’t making weapons of mass destruction. This proved to be a waste of time because they never did, but even while we were watching them, Hitler was still able to create more innovative and useful weapons that he…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personally I believe that we should not have dropped the atomic Bomb on Japan. The views for this issue is very questionable. Some say it was justified, because Japan bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. However, others would say that it was inhumane. I am part of these people. if I was the president during this time, I would not have release the bomb, unless it was absolutely necessary to bring the end to World War II.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the summer of 1945, the United States ravaged the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with newly developed, top secret atomic bombs. In the many years following this event, arguments have transpired as to whether this action was ethical, and whether it was really necessary to end World War II quickly. However, due to the wartime situation and Japan’s extreme cruelty, the United States were predominantly justified in their decision to drop the atomic bombs. Dropping the atomic bombs in Japan was a strategic method to finish the Second World War, and to avenge the Japanese with minimal casualties.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The infamous bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima is a highly controversial subject and many continue to debate about the event, over half a century after it occurred. In August of 1945, near the end of World War II, the US military dropped two atomic bombs over Japan, not only causing a mass of death and devastation, but it also induced the question- were dropping the bombs necessary and justified? Due to exaggerated statistics, and what students learn in textbooks, Americans are socialized into believing that dropping the bombs were necessary to ending the war. However, in reality, several reasons ranging from the fact that civilians outnumbered troops in the cities in which the bombs were dropped, to how Japan was willing to surrender to the US under conditions prove that to be untrue. The nuclear bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was both unjustified and unnecessary.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Towards the end of World War II, Japan had already been weakened by the battle of coral sea, but on August 6, 1945 an American B-29 bomber dropped a first hand developed atomic bomb on the civilian and military inhabited city of Hiroshima. 70,000 people were killed instantly. Thousands were left heavily injured and sick. The United States had many different reasons to be justified to have dropped the bomb. Nevertheless, the bomb was ‘a weapon of mass description, a weapon of terror’.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Fukushima nuclear reactor disaster, radioactivity and radioactive contamination have become a topic of our conversation. In the initial stage, people were terrified by it and spread bad gossip about it although they did not know what it is exactly.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Consider the role that A.Q. Khan played in the illicit nuclear trade. Would a modern terrorist group, such as ISIS, be able to obtain special nuclear materials in a similar fashion?…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Govt

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To better prepare for threats from weapon of mass destruction the United States should never under estimate the power and capability of foreign allies such as China, Russia, North Korea, Iran and Iraq to strike the United States. In addition, the National Resource Defense Counsel Report should keep track of the nuclear warheads that each country has. As…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence does exist that terrorist cells, such as Al-Qaeda, is constantly pursuing a nuclear capability. Whether that capability is acquisition or production is not necessarily certain, but the sources, as shown by the mishandling of HEU in some countries, are out there. Potential sources of nuclear weapons, like Russia and Pakistan, also present a concern due to their ample supply of tactical nuclear weapons which, by comparison of high yield bombs, have low security measures (Oppenheimer 2005,…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of nuclear weapons for better or worse have indubitably impacted our lives in one way or the other. There are the some who find these weapons to be singularly beneficial. For example Defence Analyst Edward Luttwak said “we have lived since 1945 without another world war precisely because rational minds…extracted a durable peace from the very terror of nuclear weapons.” (Luttwak, 1983). Moreover, Robert Art and Kenneth Waltz both extrapolate that “the probability of war between American and Russia or between NATO and the Warsaw Pact is practically nil precisely because the military planning and deployments of each, together with the fear of escalation to general nuclear war, keep it that way.” (Art, Waltz, 1983) Yet there are many who also share the view of Jonathan Schell who dramatically infers that if we, society, do not “rise up and cleanse the earth of nuclear weapons, we will “sink into the final coma and end it all.” (Schell, 1982) The central purpose of this essay is to challenge the conventional wisdom about nuclear proliferation; that nuclear weapons do indeed induce a greater stability amongst international politics however this does not justify countries to continue nuclear arms proliferation with seemingly no endless bounds. However despite this it is naïve to declare that a world without nuclear weapons would be without peace either. Nuclear weapons are more than just symbols of destruction and chaos but however hold far more important roles in international politics. They are at the forefront of national security and hold considerable importance in domestic debates and internal bureaucratic struggles and serve as international normative symbols of modernity and identity and as such have to be treated with utmost care and with a sense of supreme responsibility by countries that hold them.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays