For this essay I shall be highlighting the differences between the two terms; diegetic and non-diegetic sound. I shall also discuss whether or not the terms and their meanings could ever be confused. To help highlight my arguments within this essay I shall reference to films such as "The Italian Job", "Romeo and Juliet" and "Entrapment". The final section will hopefully round off the essay with a critical conclusion of the given question and the evidence presented within the essay.
Yet sound is perhaps the hardest of all techniques to study... Our primary information about
the layout of our surroundings …show more content…
Instead of simply recording a real door, Tati inserts a twanging sound like a plucked cello string each time the door swings.
(FilmSound.org, Dimensions of film sound, http://www.filmsound.org/filmart/bordwell2.htm)
Narration within a film is also considered a non-diegetic sound, for although it could quite easily link to what is taking place within the scene, it is not an 'actual ' part of the scene. Such as the characters are not normally aware of this external voice or sound. It is used to best effect when thinking of an adaptation of a classic book or story. An example of a story that used narration throughout the film is "The Englishman who went up a Hill but came down a Mountain".
Narrator: For some odd reason, lost in the mists of time, there 's an extraordinary shortage of last names in Wales...To avoid widespread confusion, Welsh people often add an occupation to a name... But one man 's name was a puzzle, and it wasn 't until I was 10 years old that I asked my grandfather about the man with the longest and most enigmatic name of all.
(iMDB, Memorable quotes from The Englishman who went up a hill but came down a mountain,