Preview

NMSA 51-1-7 (1978) disqualification of unemployment benefits

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
809 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
NMSA 51-1-7 (1978) disqualification of unemployment benefits
Sandra Bergner
PA205-unit 2 assignment
March 10, 2014

Disqualification of Unemployment Benefits

The Statute N.M.A.S. 51-1-17, (2011) which is defined as New Mexico’s Annotated Statute describes the disqualification of employee benefits. A individual shall be disqualified and not be eligible to receive benefits if the individual voluntarily left employment, misconduct associated to the individuals employment, or has failed to apply for available work when it was offered. The unemployment statute was created and enacted by The Legislature of The State of New Mexico. In section 2. 51-1-44 NMSA (1978) (being Laws 1977, Chapter 227, and section 6 as amended. The unemployment law is a federal and state partnership but mostly ran by the state employees. The unemployment disqualification law is a discretionary law due to the facts that there are circumstances and exceptions to the rules. For example: if someone was disqualified from benefits and could prove their acts of good faith in trying to search for work or for what reason to why they were disqualified, and by correcting an issue at hand, it would be up to the unemployment’s offices’ discretion to reinstate that persons benefits. The clausal term in the statute for why I believe this is true is in the 1st paragraph of 51-1-7, stating, “If it is determined by the division that the individual left employment voluntarily without good cause in connection with the employment. However, a person shall not be denied benefits”. Basically what it is meaning that the phrase “good cause” is a discretionary phrase and who would be the one to say “what is good enough cause”, or “what is not good enough cause”, for the voluntarily leaving or quitting a place of employment? That is discretionary. One of the reasons that an individual can be disqualified from unemployment benefits would be for the reason if the individual voluntarily left or quit employment without good reason other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Facts: The Plaintiff Zelma Mitchell was terminated on June 4, 1974, for alleged misconduct from the Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc. Mitchell applied for unemployment compensation benefits on June 12, 1974, she was denied these benefits finding that Mitchells act were constituted as misconduct. Being denied disqualified her for…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the Employment-at-will doctrine an employers can terminate their employees for any reason, however there are three exception to the rules. They are public-policy exception, implied-contract exception, and covenant-of-good-faith exception.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    fails or refuses to hire an individual, discharges an individual, or discriminates in any other manner against an individual in connection with compensation or the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment; or…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study

    • 2327 Words
    • 12 Pages

    It is the employers' responsibility to maintain adequate records to ensure that all workers are eligible to work in the United States. If the verification process is not completed within three days of hire; it is a violation for the company with the Department of Labor.…

    • 2327 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why is it relevant that the court says it would be easy for an employer to avoid this problem?…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Causality and N.m. Stat

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. According to this statute, what are the three ways that a person can be denied unemployment benefits in New Mexico? Must a person do all three things to be disqualified from receiving benefits, or is it enough that they only do one of the listed things? What term in the statute helped you answer this question?…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 2

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The New Mexico State legislature has enacted an express disqualification from benefits applicable to those persons found by the Department to have been discharged from their work for misconduct connected with their work.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Journal 3

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4) Individuals who are not working and are not actively looking for work are counted as unemployed if they have looked for work in the past.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Skewed Unemployment Rate

    • 3121 Words
    • 13 Pages

    1. The government no longer counts people as unemployed when they stop looking for work. The unemployment numbers don’t account for part-time workers or people seeking advanced degrees to improve their chances of landing a higher paying job.…

    • 3121 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The statute on the next page deals with the denial of unemployment benefits in New Mexico. It lists the reasons for which the Division of Unemployment Services can disqualify a person from receiving unemployment benefits. Read the statute, and then answer the questions which follow.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Under the legal doctrine of “employment at will” an employee can be lawfully terminated from her job for:…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unemployment benefits

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When asked to pick a topic recently from the world of business and news I could not think of a better controversial topic than the world of Unemployment Benefits and if and how the long term benefits lead to long term Unemployment rate.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexican Labor Law

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mexican labor law is very paternalistic and follows a stability principle. The employment stability principle favors the employee, assuring and protecting the permanency and continuity in the employment relationship, unless there is a cause of termination limited and established by the Federal Labor Law. This contrasts with U.S. Labor Law which is ruled by the at-will employment doctrine.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There may be some persons who choose not to work; there may be some individuals who simply cannot work for reasons that otherwise prevent them from doing so. However, the majority of persons who are unemployed are at that stage involuntarily and for varying reasons, based on the current economic situation, and not by their choice. Why then, would one decide not to be employed? In a scenario where voluntary unemployment takes place, many persons feel that their current wage is not high enough to justify them working. They may feel that what they have contributed to the company is not seen as value added. They may also have a poor relationship with management. Therefore, they will leave their current job in search of another, with better compensation and benefits, opportunities and challenges; often times not able to be…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unemployment Issue

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According from the article that I read about “The Unemployment Issue Among the Malay Job Seekers”, I do not agree with some of the statement that the writer states in the article. In my opinion, firstly, I do not agree when the writer say that Malays student can’t get along with other races students. From my experience, most Chinese students are hard to get along and tolerate with Malays or maybe Indians in school or college. I am not sure the statement is based on what IPT whether public or private institutions. We cannot blame the Malay students, some IPT, such as UiTM obviously, majority 90% of the students is mostly among Malays races, so the problem about cannot get along is maybe about the procedure of the university itself. Secondly, I think the writer is focusing the blame mostly on the mistake that the candidates do in writing their resume. I dont think it is the the real issue, the important thing is whether the candidates have the aspect to employ them to be their workers. For example, maybe their experience or the field of study among the candidates is suit with what they are looking for. Thirdly, I think the employers itself whether they are Chinese or else, sometime they do not employ the Malays candidates because of they cannot speak proper Malay language. So they think it hard to communicate properly with the Malay employees in future. I think the issue is not the problem, nowadays, most students are taking their study on the other language such as Mandarin. So the employer should not be afraid to hire Malays candidates. Apart from that, I think the writer is obviously pointing his finger to Malays races in seeking job for instant. I don’t think the Malay is the only races that seeking for the job in an instant such as in blog or in the website, other races also have doing the same thing. It is an initiative in finding a job, so what the problem either? We can also find for a vacancy job in the website so I think the writer cannot simply said…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays