Preview

Nietzsche's Philosophy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
635 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nietzsche's Philosophy
Nietzsche begins by tearing apart the philosopher and his views. They idolize concepts and threaten the life of anything they worship. In Nietzsche’s opinion, once the philosophers got to these concepts nothing managed to escape alive. In response Nietzsche says, “that which is, does not become; that which becomes, is not.” Nietzsche explains that the philosophers all believe in the which is, however they fail to understand so instead they search for a reason why it withholds itself from them. Finally this “trickster” is revealed and is the senses. The senses are believed to have tricked them about the true world. Nietzsche reveals a moral as to not trust history because it is nothing but belief in the senses, which has discovered to be a lie. …show more content…
By doing this they have cut off the growth of this idea or concept and have kept it stagnant. Nietzsche reveals another moral regarding this action, “everything that is the first rank must be the cause of itself,” meaning in order to be placed first the concept must be unquestionably good, perfect and possess no doubt. After establishing this, Nietzsche moves on to the “problem of error and illusion.” Nietzsche explains that we are obliged by the predisposition of reason that we perceive ourselves to be swept up and knotted in error on the basis of a rigorous self-examination; and this is where the error lies. Nietzsche then provides insight as to a discovery made many years later. Philosophers were stunned to discover their previous certainty in controlling the categories of reason from experience was a falsehood. The questions then came as to “where did they come from (being)?” Nietzsche says, “nothing up to now has been more naively persuasive than the error of being.” In an attempt to aid his listeners understanding Nietzsche created four theses concerning his ‘“Reason” in Philosophy.” The first proposition explains that this world in which we live in is regarded as “apparent” or “grounds for its reality” any other reality cannot

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The racist and fascist foundation of Nazism has often been attributed to the writings of Nietzsche. In actuality, however, not only did Nietzsche not espouse such ideas, but also he also expressly opposed them. The blatant racism, oppression, and mass mentality of the Nazi regime are incompatible with Nietzsche's writings. Conceptually, it is difficult to fathom how Hitler managed to warp Nietzsche's ideas and writings to fuel his own totalitarian Nazi agenda. Although Nietzsche's writings did influence Hitler, it was only through misinterpretation and manipulation that Hitler came to believe that Nietzsche held pro-Nazi beliefs and promoted his works as the philosophical underpinning of the Third Reich.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm, Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Edited by Rolf-Peter Horstmann, Judith Norman; translated by Judith Norman. Cambridge University Press, 2002.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedrich Nietzsche is a German Philosopher, who studied and written several critical texts. The type of texts he wrote were along the lines of philosophy, religion, contemporary culture, and science. Nietzsche is known for a lot of his work, but master-slave morality is highly valued. Master-slave morality was the first subject in Nietzsche’s book, On the Genealogy of Morality. In this book Nietzsche defines the difference between Slave morality and Master morality. When Nietzsche compares between the two types of morality he distinguish strength versus weakness, the difference is primarily one of power and also love independence. The master knows he has power and abilities to aspire to excellence, also he…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    because of teachings that were passed on from family to family. Nietzsche saw things that others…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the vast majority morals are sets of guidelines that we should comply, they let us know what is correct or off-base. Moral philosophers need to find how these guidelines are legitimized, and at the consistent outcomes of moral or moral convictions. The time of enlightenment saw a questioning of religious and customary qualities. Philosophers expected to construct moral framework in light of reasonable grounds. Kant's moral framework depends on levelheadedness. It endeavors to indicate how any objective being would consent to widespread moral laws. Its impact has been colossal and current philosophers still utilize Kant's thoughts as a beginning stage for exchanges on morality. The other incredible moral arrangement of the post-enlightenment time is…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is now nearing the end of this fall semester and throughout these months I have encountered many new philosophies. Many of my ideals have been challenged and I have had to myself, confront my beliefs. Most recently, I’ve discovered the philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche and Gloria Anzaldúa. Compared with the other philosophies, these two seem to be the most similar in at least their belief that there is no one right way to the good life, but rather there are many and are suited to each individual.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By re-read the last paragraph of chapter two, Heinrich Koselitz finds that his friend Nietzsche changes his writing style to be tighter and telegraphic by using keyboard (Carr. 18). However, not only Nietzsche’s writing is changed by typing, but my writing is also changed by typing.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christianity as antiquity.-- When we hear the ancient bells growling on a Sunday morning we ask ourselves: Is it really possible! This, for a jew, crucified two thousand years ago, who said he was God's son? The proof of such a claim is lacking. Certainly the Christian religion is an antiquity projected into our times from remote prehistory; and the fact that the claim is believed - whereas one is otherwise so strict in examining pretensions - is perhaps the most ancient piece of this heritage. A god who begets children with a mortal woman; a sage who bids men work no more, have no more courts, but look for the signs of the impending end of the world; a justice that accepts the innocent as a vicarious sacrifice; someone who orders his disciples to drink his blood; prayers for miraculous interventions; sins perpetrated against a god, atoned for by a god; fear of a beyond to which death is the portal; the form of the cross as a symbol in a time that no longer knows the function and ignominy of the cross -- how ghoulishly all this touches us, as if from the tomb of a primeval past! Can one believe that such things are still believed?…

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nietzsche here specifies that his task is not simply to expose the psychological and historical eventuality that make for different moralities, but to question moralities for their objective value. It is exposed how a particular morality comes from a tradition. Nietzsche states how the only thing that matters is their current, actual functional value in objective terms, and their potential functional value. The work can be used to determine whether the values of the road’s protagonist’s actions are subjective, meaning they fit the characters needs. It can also be used to determine if there is any source of absolute morality in the novel.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nietzsche Dionysis

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What method does Nietzsche use to become the Dionysian Overman? What perspective on life does the Overman adopt? How does it enable “amor fati” and express optimum Yes-saying to our present natural life in the world? How does this overcome “slave morality or religion”?…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nietzsche: the Conscience

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In his second essay of the Geneaology of Morals, Nietzsche attempts to identify and explain the origin of the conscience. He does not adopt the view of the conscience that is accepted by the “English Psychologists”, such as Bentham, J. Mill, J.S. Mill and Hume, as the result of an innate moral feeling. Rather, it is his belief that the moral content of our conscience is formed during childhood under the influence of society. Nietzsche defines the conscience as an introspective phenomenon brought about by a feeling of responsibility, in which one analyzes their own morality due to the internalization of the values of society. This definition holds the position that the conscience is not something innate to humans, rather it has arisen through evolution. In light of this, this paper will give insight into how Nietzsche reaches this conclusion, as well as what results from it. In order to do this there will be discussion of guilt, punishment, the will to power and implications from society.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cite your sources and provide a Works Cited page. Failure to cite sources constitutes plagiarism. (If you are using websites, I recommend putting their URLs etc. in footnotes.)…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three types of history according to Nietzsche are monumental, antiquarian, and critical. Monumental history tells us how to act in the present according to our past. Disadvantages of such history are that it portrays only the affects but not the causes. In addition, monumental history doesn't appreciate individuality and looks only at the general not the specific. However; some advantages of monumental history are, that monuments are essential for reminder of the past and continuity eliminates doubt. Antiquarian history also has its pros and cons. It is the history of the man who wants to know himself, and looks at what is small and limited of everyday life. Advantage of such history include interest in individuality, building identity as individuals but also collective in tradition and religion. On page 20 and 21 Nietzsche also talks about the disadvantages of such history. Antiquarian history allows no growth; it is conservative and reduces life to knowledge. The last type of history according to Nietzsche is critical. It is Nietzsche's favorite history because its for the Rebel and its for the person who wants to break with the past. The history is good because it builds the future on new grounds, however; it is also dangerous for life itself. According to Nietzsche this is a need for life to go on and it is risky. But according to Nietzsche we have to take risks and not stay on conservative side. You can't be intact with history throughout your life because it is poisoning the present and allows no mobility. Freedom for Nietzsche is not knowing the future, thus we have to take risks and hope for the best. The optimist standpoint of a historical man states that we have to have hope in the future rather than be entangled with the past whereas a figure of super historical man states that there is no hope in changing the future but rather we have to live in the present and not worry about anything…

    • 331 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philosophy

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The issue of knowledge is definitely an essential part in philosophy. It forces us to question whether we are certain of the things we think we know, and whether we can justify the things we know are actually true. This theory or study of knowledge can be referred to as epistemology. All these views on knowledge can vary depending on how we view the world itself. We are able to perceive the world through the application of our senses, however, our senses alone can be very deceiving. We can never really be definite of what we know just by looking at the world the way it is. We are able to make opinions and assumptions about what we see, smell, taste, and hear, but can never really be absolute. In order to claim knowledge, it requires certainty that something is true.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Old Philosophy Final

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Chiefly, Nietzsche believes that Socrates' notion of supremacy of reason is just a euphemism for his rationale which is as tyrannous as the state he opposes. Socrates believed that truth was accessible through reason (and through reason alone) while Nietzsche would have argued against the whole idea of truth let alone the possibility of knowing it. Reason was, for him, corrupted by our own will to power—the fundamental principle of human actions—and thus, any truth claim would inevitably be compromised by that principle.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays