Preview

Nietzsche's Fate For The Weak Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
596 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nietzsche's Fate For The Weak Analysis
It is easy for readers, especially modern readers, to see Nietzsche’s work as promoting hatred and bigotry. But upon a closer reading of the text, this does not seem to be the case. The strong are right and just in their actions because they are strong, with not further justification needed. Nietzsche does not advocate a mistreatment or hatred towards the weak. Instead, he sees the rational thing for the strong to do is to be indifferent towards them, in the same way that the wolf does not bother himself with the opinions or goings-on of lambs. From a certain perspective, because of Nietzsche’s admiration of strength, he seems to be open towards the weak empowering themselves and becoming strong – which would be a much more favorable fate for the weak than seen in many societies, where the weak are seen as the always-weak. Nietzsche seems open to the idea of the weak challenging and …show more content…
However, to understand Nietzsche, it is important to realize that his view of Christian morality is that it is a tool – a club swung by the weak to subjugate the strong. The truth value is irrelevant. The weak people did not reverse morality because they thought it was true – they did it because it served them. It empowered them to gain the upper hand over those who were physically or financially more powerful than they were. When the weak lacked land, horses, swords, armies, or money, they restrained the strong with threats of eternal damnation, or by painting the strong as someone who is diseased with sin – someone who lacked the virtues of gentleness, obedience, or meekness. I think Nietzsche wanted to liberate Europe from the chains of Christian morality so that it could escape its problems and once again enter into the real morality – the morality of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The breaking of the human spirit is prevalent in all periods of history dating back to the beginning of time. There is an ongoing civil war of hatred that is prominent in humanity. Despite the obvious fact that all humans should have equal rights, people still deprive each other of these simple liberties. Such as during the Holocaust. The Holocaust was a horrific event where Nazis humiliated and tortured people of minorities, especially those that identify as Jewish. These people were belittled to nothing besides worthless animals in the eyes of many. The behavior of the Nazis, and their treatment toward these humans are an extreme violation in relation to the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights”. In Elie Wiesel’s memoir, Night, he describes…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine not being able to have food, water, and happiness, all taken away in a snap only to be replaced with an everlasting nightmare. Elie Wiesel was only a teenager before he was taken away by german officers to be apart of the Holocaust, having faced being separated from his family, barely a speck of food and endless torment for ten years. As a Holocaust survivor he wrote the book Night so that there would be a changed in history and nothing would repeat itself but also remember the Holocaust. Therefore war dehumanizes people because once stripped of their general needs it forces people to get it themselves.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Beyond Good & Evil, Friedrich Nietzsche seeks to develop the idea of moral philosophy beyond basic pleasures, how they relate to the general population, and further into our own personal intricacies and how they create a set of rules that apply to most individuals. Throughout the book, Nietzsche articulate well over 200 epigrams, each of which highlights a different aspect of human morality. Nietzsche’s 68th epigram dictates: “‘I have done that,’ says my memory. ‘I cannot have done that,’ says my pride, and remains inexorable. Eventually--memory yields.” When assessing this aphorism, it is not only important to assess why our memory yields and what ensues as a result, but also what would occur if we didn’t. One could argue that we must remember our mistakes and learn from them and, by choosing to forget our mistakes for our own pride’s sake, we stall our own moral progression. However, it could also be said that forgetting our own mistakes is vital to our moral progression because rather than merely learning from our mistakes, by constantly remembering them, we allow ourselves to be caught in a cycle of guilt, preventing us from truly moving on. Rather than blindly assessing the aphorism on its own, one must look through Nietzsche’s lens regarding the concepts of intention and truth in order to determine which of the above interpretations is more plausible. Although the first notion is a reasonable interpretation of Nietzsche’s epigram regarding widely accepted notions of morality, the second proves to be a more valid conclusion when following Nietzschean philosophy. While the first interpretation allows for moral recognition and awareness, the second allows for actual progress in the individual.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eng103 1ST Essay

    • 1310 Words
    • 4 Pages

    being Christianity, is a misleading leader. Nietzsche once stated that morality goes to the extent to “condemn for its own sake” and that the “church is hostile to life.” (Nietzsche, Friedrich) Furthermore, he believed that Christianity, along with “morals,” is a hindrance to us and its only purpose is to chain us and bring us down. I believe that he found the thought of having such a powerful institution, such as Christianity and morality, as outrages and absurd for depriving the people from their true passions and only making the people feel that shame and guilt are the worst sins one can commit. He believed that the people should not allow Christianity or morals, or anything in general, to make one…

    • 1310 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedrich Nietzsche is a German Philosopher, who studied and written several critical texts. The type of texts he wrote were along the lines of philosophy, religion, contemporary culture, and science. Nietzsche is known for a lot of his work, but master-slave morality is highly valued. Master-slave morality was the first subject in Nietzsche’s book, On the Genealogy of Morality. In this book Nietzsche defines the difference between Slave morality and Master morality. When Nietzsche compares between the two types of morality he distinguish strength versus weakness, the difference is primarily one of power and also love independence. The master knows he has power and abilities to aspire to excellence, also he…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hughes, Langston. "Salvation." [The Big Sea, 1940.] The McGraw-Hill Reader: Issues across the Disciplines. Ed. Gilbert H. Muller. 11th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2011. 642-643. Print.…

    • 636 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If there was a god, why would he/she be so harsh? The text is compared to the book Night by Ellie Wiesel and from the poems “Night over Birkenau” and “Harbach 1944”. The book Night tells the story of a young boy and his father fighting for their freedom from the Nazis; Ellie Wiesel tells the story of his experience of the Holocaust. Both of the poems show the journeys of people and how they pictured all of the madness. Ellie fights through many hardships, but comes out of the Holocaust victorious! Ellie and his father were both willing and strong throughout the Holocaust, but his father escaped a different way. The theme states that during survival, people think about needs rather than wants. This is clearly developed in the poems “Night over Birkenau” By Janos Piliszky and “Harbach 1944” and Night to show harshness, survival, and fear.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The more powerful, noble men saw themselves as good when they observed the contrast between themselves and those inferior to them: the weak, poor, and common people. Here Nietzsche introduces the contrast between master morality and slave morality and how the first concept of good and bad arose. As I mentioned earlier, the masters, nobles, and stronger people defined good as a reflection of themselves. Now when they came to contact with the weak, the slaves, the poor, and the common people, they attributed the concept of bad to them as the opposite side to what they saw on themselves. Their position of power is what also gave them control over language the power label things such as what is good and what is bad. On the other hand when the weak side came into contact with the nobles, after realizing they were inferior to the nobles, the feeling of ressentiment arose, which as we will later see, rearranged the concept of good and…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An issue in today’s society is discrimination. For consistency I will define discrimination as anything that denies a group of people from any universal privileges. A few examples of this would be racism, LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bi, Transgender) rights, and sexism. These issue have been present through all points in American and World History, normally putting the white adult heterosexual male as the most privileged and discriminations putting everyone else below him. In the twenty-first century measures have recently been taken to correct for the unjust treatment of those other than white males for factors out of their control. These factors of course include skin color, sex, and sexual orientation. I feel Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morality…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If God is all powerful and all good, then why is there evil in the world? Why did the holocaust happen if God cares for his people? Why are women treated unequally if we are all made in God's image? Why do some still starve to death because of their inability to buy food? Why does racism exist? Viktor Frankl in Man's Search for Meaning offers an answer to those struggling with these questions. Frankl explains that all else can be taken away from a Holocaust victim except his ability to respond positively in a situation (87). Though his career, fortune, and family might be ripped from his hands, he can still turn suffering and hardship into something beautiful and meaningful. Victor explains "Even though lack of sleep, insufficient food and various mental stresses may suggest that the inmates were bound to act in certain ways...it becomes clear that the sort of person a prisoner became was the result of an inner decision" (87). Those experiencing hardship around the world today can still choose to respond positively and create a life worth living and fighting for. In fact, suffering helps one to grow. Frankl says, "The way in which a man accepts his fate and all the suffering it entails, the way in which he takes up his cross, gives him ample opportunity-even under the most difficult circumstances-to add a deeper meaning to his life"(88). Suffering allows one to add this "deeper meaning to his life". If they choose to, one can become stronger and deeper through their hardship. Frankl quotes Fyodor Dostoevski saying, "There is only one thing that I dread: not to be worthy of my sufferings" (87). How one responds to inequality and disparity in the world, determines if he/she is worthy of suffering. One might choose to respond morally and with a goodness inherent to the human condition, or act grievously. Those struggling with inequality can find meaning in their…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In conclusion. Wherever there was money to be made a bible to be read in any part of the world, Europe would try its hardest until it was there. Europe’s rise to prosperity was indeed inevitable. With their tremendous drive for wealth and spreading of faith, along with their ever-expanding resources, I can’t really imagine turning out any differently for them. It does make one wonder: With as big of an influence as they had on the world, how would the world look today if Europe just kept to…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elie Wiesel showed many ways that people can be evil towards others. In the concentration camps the guards were allowed to do whatever they wanted. In the beginning of the story when Moshe the Beadle returned from deportation he told a story about what the guards did. In one passage it says. "Babies were thrown into the air and the machine gunners used them as targets." [Wiesel, 4] The Nazi's cared so little about the people they were imprisoning that they could do such cruel and inhumane things to even babies that were totally innocent. In another passage it shows how selfishly evil people can become. The prisoners are in a train and people are throwing food into the train to watch them fight for it. The passage is of an old man coming out with some food and getting beat on by his own son. The passage reads, "Meir, Meir, my boy! Don't you recognize me? I'm your father"¦you're hurting me"¦you're killing your father! I've got some bread"¦for you too"¦" [Wiesel, 96] "He collapsed. His fist still clenched around a small piece. He tried to carry it to his mouth. But the other one threw himself upon it and snatched it. The old man again whispered something, let out a rattle, and died amid the general indifference. His son searched him, took the bread and began to devour it." [Wiesel, 96] People can be so selfish that they will do anything to get what they want. This old man got food for his son, but he killed him so he would not have to share with his father.…

    • 680 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nietzsche here specifies that his task is not simply to expose the psychological and historical eventuality that make for different moralities, but to question moralities for their objective value. It is exposed how a particular morality comes from a tradition. Nietzsche states how the only thing that matters is their current, actual functional value in objective terms, and their potential functional value. The work can be used to determine whether the values of the road’s protagonist’s actions are subjective, meaning they fit the characters needs. It can also be used to determine if there is any source of absolute morality in the novel.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The "active nihilist" undergoes the same existential disorientation and despair which goes hand in hand with the underlying nihilist idea that life is utterly meaningless, however instead of subscribing oneself to a mass movement of some sort or drowning in hopelessness, Nietzsche paints a picture of an active nihilist who "charges forward and consciously destroys all beliefs which previously gave meaning to their lives". He goes on to explain that nihilism ¨reaches its maximum of relative strength as a violent force of destruction - as active nihilism.¨ After this removal of previously held sentiments, the active nihilist stands alone in the universe, bearing the weight of true independence and an ability to craft his/her own meaning, rather…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Antichrist

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nietzsche sets out to denounce and illegitimize not only Christianity itself as a belief and a practice, but also the ethical-moral value system which modern western civilization has inherited from it in the Antichrist. One of the most important of these ideas is that Christianity has made people nihilistic and weak by regarding pity and related sentiments as the highest virtues. Nietzsche traces the origin of these values to the ancient Jews who lived under Roman occupation, but here he puts them in terms of a reversal of their conception of God. I agree with some of the ideas Nietzsche offers in regards to Christianity and other ideas related to Buddhism.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays