Preview

Nietzsche Beyond Evil

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
447 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nietzsche Beyond Evil
In “Beyond Good and Evil”, Friedrich Nietzsche argues that “life is will to power” (p.68). In this paper, I will argue for this argument because I believe that people are controlled by elements of power exist in every aspect of life. The kind of power that is being referred in this paper is the capability, ability to direct or influence others. A general life cycle consists of three phases: going to school, getting a job and eventually death. We have been exposed to this kind of power since the day we were born. Our parents, our grandparents or the elders in general, have power over us. As kids, we followed their guidelines, their teachings and their commands because they have authority over us. Growing up a little bit more, we have the school system, in which we are to follow teachers’ orders and their knowledge. After we are done with school, we get jobs, in which we follow our supervisor’s commands, do what we are told to do. As …show more content…
However, that is not the case because society is under the management of rules and regulations, we are just a composition of a large population and are always bond with responsibilities to follow the rules. Even one of the most powerful people in the world, the president of the United States, is still being held responsible with laws and orders. Others might say that living detached from the society will bring about freedom. I would argue that this is freedom from materialistic desires, not freedom from laws, orders nor nature. One can become one with nature by living in it but one is still being influential by the power of nature, as it is capable of bringing sickness and harm. Another argument to the mentioned topic is that by being a true children of God, one can be freed. This is not necessarily true. Aren’t all Christians, Catholics children of God? Hence, aren’t them living by the teachings of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The professor Philip Hallie’s ‘From Cruelty to Goodness’ radiates unwavering genuine philanthropy which by its nature oppose the cruelty and imbalance of power he talks about. The understanding of how cruelty works goes through the understanding what cruelty is and what morality has to say about that. Professor Hallie recognizes two types of ethics- negative and positive- that illuminate the path of good-making. The negative is the ban for actions associated with deliberate harm-making and pain-inflicting on other human beings. The most significant negative ethical rules are the Ten Commandments, says the professor. As reverse, the positive rules enjoin actions that preserve human’s welfare. The positive ethics commands activity; demands courage, and takes sacrifice. The positive ethical rules are for the brave. In close association with the ethical rules, whether negative or positive, comes the question what cruelty is? Had we looked at the institutionalized type of cruelty from the near past to nowadays as the slavery, the Holocaust, the political prisons and the prisoner-of-war camps we would see the cruelty is not mere bloodshed, cut-off limbs, beatings and other atrocities which all are included though. The cruelty goes beyond that- it affects the self-respect, self-esteem, all of that which makes person a person and destroys it. So the cruelty not only (often) kills the body, it first kills the spirit, the soul, the life inside. As professor Hallie uncovers the cruelty derives from something so frequently seen as the imbalanced power in the relationship. The relationship could be both personal (private) or institutionalized. The imbalance is being born when the power between the two parties is unequally distributed, often leaving one of the parties with negligible or no power. Respectively, the strong party gains not only the power to decide for herself but to rule over the destiny of the powerless side. The imbalance of power resides in families, business…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power is the ability to influence people to perform in a specific way. The ambition of having power, has made humans influence other peoples’ lives and nature. For example, writer David Hume presented and criticized the “is-ought problem—the notion that we can derive what ought to be from an example of what is” (Barash 283). People are not satisfied with what is natural, so they want to go furthermore and try to change it, using any sources they have within their reach. We are unstoppable, the more we have the more we want.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great Compromise Definition

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Power: The ability or capacity to direct the behavior of people or type of events.…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is one thing to have power. It is another to know how to use it. Once a person is giver power over others it is important that they know how to use it in the correct way. The more power one has, the more responsibility they take on.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power In Brave New World

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Power can be defined as the possession of control, authority, or influence over others” (“Power”1). It is a term that has been passed down since the beginning of time or humanity that has led to the development of modern society today. Power is not necessarily used in a negative way. It can be used as a way to lead, similar to the president, as well as to set an example for people in the world. Throughout history, power has evolved from being utilized for violence and self-benefit, to the development and betterment of the general masses. In modern society today, it is a massive driving force in determining what is to happen next. This idea of authority is a continuous theme in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. In modern society as well as in…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious cruelty is the harassment of one religion to another. It involves the different views of all kind of beliefs as how they are beaten down by each other. In Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche the discussion God being seen as a different figure to all religions is brought up. In my response, I will analysis the passages 55, 66, 67, 129, and 183. Passage 55 states, “There is a great ladder of religious cruelty with many rungs; but three of them are the most important. At one time one sacrificed human beings to one's god, perhaps precisely those human beings one loved best….” (Nietzsche 55). When this statement is made, he is explaining that the ladder of God is questioned of which direction it is going in. When we look at faith…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Response to Nietzsche

    • 280 Words
    • 1 Page

    “The genesis of language does not proceed logically in any case, and all the material within which and with which the man of truth, the scientist, and the philosopher later work and build, if not derived from never-never land, is at least not derived from the essence of things” Truth and language are fundamentally social conventions which have their origins in metaphor and are arbitrary and subjective and that language is not about adequately mirroring the world. I support this idea; the reason is that if we consider that we have different languages, we can see that each one works about equally well even though each is so different. But maybe the purpose of language is not one-to-one meticulousness or correspondence to reality. Pure truth would echo the Kantian thing-in-itself independent of our experiences; therefore it verifies the concept that there is no pure truth in language. Language is there to deal with relations of things to man. To do this, bold metaphors are needed. A metaphor says that “A is B” where B really belongs to a different category of being. We forget the origin of truth in metaphors, metonymies, and anthropomorphisms, they congeal and harden, are taken for granted, and we come to assume that they necessarily describe the way the world really is. Which is why I believe Nietzsche’s essay is a meta-rhetorical expedition into how meaning comes to mean, and there is no true in our words because it is a man made creation, and a creation (truth) that differs relative to our personal perspectives then the concept of it would have been completely insignificant and we would not be discussing this piece 200 years later……

    • 280 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche makes the point how even within Christianity that living a pious life, would set people up as thinking they were good. Religious followers try to create a clear distinction that those who do not follow their example are considered evil. Nietzsche says that as people continued to live up to moral codes they perceived themselves as the masters of all things good. The problem is they eventually become self-diluted taking on the characteristics of, “the good, themselves, meaning the noble, the mighty, and high-placed, who… saw themselves as good.” (Nietzsche, 2) What he was saying was that “good” was now obtained by a position or a mindset, and diminishing the very concept of “good”, from its nobility and purpose. Good now has become positional, causing those impoverished to be classified as evil.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The beginnings of the practice of philosophy were rooted in the development of a universal truth and its relations to religious, artistic, and economic structures. Friedrich Nietzsche, a 19th century philosopher, destroyed this practice entirely by “rebuilding” philosophy from the ground up, being completely skeptical of every finding that had come before him. This included the principles of Christianity, which Nietzsche criticized deeply in his work Beyond Good and Evil. He particularly denounced Christianity for its focus on “slave morality,” which he contrasts with “master morality” in Beyond Good and Evil, and its incessant emphasis on self-sacrifice. In 1992, Pope John Paul II illustrated and clarified these concepts through the Catechism…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1844, Friedrich Nietzsche was born in a small village in present day Germany. Nevertheless, he would grow up to become one of the most recognized philosophers. One of his revolutionary ideas spoke of the feeling of power. It was referred to as “On the Doctrine of the Feeling of Power”. I agree with Nietzsche’s ideas on power written about in “On the Doctrine of the Feeling of Power”.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the light of Nietzsche's repeated assertion that everything is in constant flux , this includes the will to power as well. In fact, it is the will to power as the origin of the world in all its aspects that causes this to be in a constant motion. Hence, just as Lear thought of love as a drive, Nietzsche too thinks of our moral source as something “always on the move”. Furthermore, as the moral source is the framework of our world, it cannot precede it but necessarily come to be with what it frames – that is, at the same time as our subjectivity comes to be and to conceive itself within a world. In this sense, “will to power” is itself nothing but a representation of the essence of reality, insofar as this composes us, our world, and the morals through which we frame our experience of…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within our world we have described many things and called them into scrutiny and this act of thorough observation has brought transparency to our senses. The soul, also known as the subject, has been questioned and attempted to be defined by German philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche, in his 1887 work entitled “On the Genealogy of Morality.” The heart of the problems Nietzsche pursues lie within each subjects’ understanding of their origin of thought. Nietzsche examines the origins of Western morality and begins his analysis of what good and evil can come from our definitions of “good” and “evil”, themselves. Nietzsche’s understanding of spontaneous emotion, daily habit, good, bad, and whatever lies in between, adds to our knowledge of ethics and propels our inquiry into the universality of…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Genealogy of Morals is comprised of three essays that focus on and criticizes the value of moral judgements. The first essay, “Good and Evil,” “Good and Bad” contrasts what Nietzsche describes as “Master Morality,” “Slave Morality.” Master morality was developed by the strong, free and healthy who had control over their own happiness. Slave morality is the feelings that the slaves adopted from being controlled by their wealthy and happy masters. These people were nicknamed the masters of evil and ironically called themselves good by comparison. The second essay “Guilt, “Bad Conscience,” and the like. It deals with guilt and bad conscience and the like. Nietzsche traced the origins of the ideas and found out that the idea of guilt and punishment were originally not based on any sense of moral transgression. Instead guilt actually meant some sort of debt was owed and that punishment was simply a form of…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nietzsche begins the second essay, which is an exploration of the origins of guilt and morality, by presenting the problem of humankind: breeding an animal with the ‘prerogative to promise’. Humans must actively forget things in order to cope with life – without doing this we could not have mental order or any semblance of happiness. Forgetting things, then, is a strength, but is also the natural tendency of our minds. Memory is not the passive retention of impressions that many believe it to be, but rather an active desire not to let something go – to suspend forgetfulness. We need to be able to do this in order to make promises and thus have control over the future. It is important for man to anticipate the future and calculate what may happen – to develop reliability and regularity so that he can be answerable for his own future.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samantha Parks OB Case

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Power refers to a capacity that one has to influence the behavior of the other.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays