Preview

On the Genealogy of Morality: Friedrich Nietzsche's Polemic

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
On the Genealogy of Morality: Friedrich Nietzsche's Polemic
Nietzsche is inherently polemic. This is a characterization that Nietzsche has applied to himself; the book that both informs, and is informed by every other book Nietzsche has written on the subject of revaluation of existing values, On the Genealogy of Morality, is subtitled simply A Polemic. It is clear that in this context, Nietzsche’s polemic is derived from the extent to which Nietzsche’s argument will invariably conflict with the existing system of valuation, to which the book is meant to serve as an arrow. However, absent is any indication that there exists an internal polemic derived from any form of logical incompleteness. The same may not be said for Thus Spoke Zarathustra, an introduction to which, written by one of its earliest modern translators, RJ Hollingdale, reads: “The book’s worst fault is excess.” Its excesses here, I will argue, derive from Nietzsche’s attempt at metaphysics, which constitutes Nietzsche’s true polemic, inasmuch as it in turn makes Zarathustra vulnerable to logical incompleteness. This vulnerability may be best observed when contrasted with his other works, such as the Genealogy of Morality; Hollingdale continues to write in his introduction: “As it happens, excess is the one fault no one could impute Nietzsche’s subsequent works: there concision, brevity, directness of statement are present to a degree not even approximated by any other German philosopher.” Such discipline may be said to characterize the Genealogy, and ultimately results in an overarching logical completeness to the book, which will here be defined as the ability for an argument to safely be brought to its logical conclusion through reason alone. In fact, this is likely the book’s greatest strength. To summarize, the first essay of the Genealogy introduces the dichotomous relationship between the master morality, which characterizes the strong-willed, also referred to those who create values, whereas the slave morality characterizes the weak-willed, and feel

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    There are remarkable similarities between the structure and purpose of the early Wittgenstein’s philosophy (specifically as seen in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus) and the writing style of Ernest Hemingway. Both seem to represent meaning in life, ethics, and values in their writing precisely by making apparent their absence.…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The racist and fascist foundation of Nazism has often been attributed to the writings of Nietzsche. In actuality, however, not only did Nietzsche not espouse such ideas, but also he also expressly opposed them. The blatant racism, oppression, and mass mentality of the Nazi regime are incompatible with Nietzsche's writings. Conceptually, it is difficult to fathom how Hitler managed to warp Nietzsche's ideas and writings to fuel his own totalitarian Nazi agenda. Although Nietzsche's writings did influence Hitler, it was only through misinterpretation and manipulation that Hitler came to believe that Nietzsche held pro-Nazi beliefs and promoted his works as the philosophical underpinning of the Third Reich.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bruce Friedrich makes his argument through the use of pathos, a rhetorical appeal that evokes an emotional reaction from the reader, and several other rhetorical…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Beyond Good & Evil, Friedrich Nietzsche seeks to develop the idea of moral philosophy beyond basic pleasures, how they relate to the general population, and further into our own personal intricacies and how they create a set of rules that apply to most individuals. Throughout the book, Nietzsche articulate well over 200 epigrams, each of which highlights a different aspect of human morality. Nietzsche’s 68th epigram dictates: “‘I have done that,’ says my memory. ‘I cannot have done that,’ says my pride, and remains inexorable. Eventually--memory yields.” When assessing this aphorism, it is not only important to assess why our memory yields and what ensues as a result, but also what would occur if we didn’t. One could argue that we must remember our mistakes and learn from them and, by choosing to forget our mistakes for our own pride’s sake, we stall our own moral progression. However, it could also be said that forgetting our own mistakes is vital to our moral progression because rather than merely learning from our mistakes, by constantly remembering them, we allow ourselves to be caught in a cycle of guilt, preventing us from truly moving on. Rather than blindly assessing the aphorism on its own, one must look through Nietzsche’s lens regarding the concepts of intention and truth in order to determine which of the above interpretations is more plausible. Although the first notion is a reasonable interpretation of Nietzsche’s epigram regarding widely accepted notions of morality, the second proves to be a more valid conclusion when following Nietzschean philosophy. While the first interpretation allows for moral recognition and awareness, the second allows for actual progress in the individual.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedrich Nietzsche believed that everyone should own up to envy because there was nothing wrong with being envious and it should serve as a guide or indication of what we could become one day. He believed that if we had a purpose in life we could put up with almost anything to be able to achieve what we wanted. Although, Nietzsche’s intentions were meant for good, envy does not always serve as a great guide or indication of what we could become. Some could take a negative turn to that emotion and possibly harm themselves or others in order to attain whatever it was they envied from the other party. Not everyone would take that as a means of motivation to work harder for what they truly desired or envied, some would have resorted to the…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is now nearing the end of this fall semester and throughout these months I have encountered many new philosophies. Many of my ideals have been challenged and I have had to myself, confront my beliefs. Most recently, I’ve discovered the philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche and Gloria Anzaldúa. Compared with the other philosophies, these two seem to be the most similar in at least their belief that there is no one right way to the good life, but rather there are many and are suited to each individual.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. What types of connections did you make most often as you read: text to text, text to self, or text to world? How did making connections increase your understanding of the magazine article?…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No serious thinker has done more unintentional harm to the Jewish people than Friedrich Nietzsche. Following his death, Nietzsche’s writings served as an inspiration and philosophical justification for Adolf Hitler and Nazism. Quite paradoxically, Nietzsche was far from anti-Semitic; in fact, many considered Nietzsche to be one of the more pro-Jewish philosophers of his era. Although Nietzsche’s position against anti-Semitism seems clear in the second and the third essay of The Genealogy of Morals, it is possible to misconstrue comments within the first essay as anti-Semitic. Yet considering the totality of Nietzsche’s writing in his The Genealogy of Morals, the Nazis wrongly regarded…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To understand Nietzsche’s version of the origin of guilt, some background information is necessary. In The Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche introduces the reader to two different types of morality; the slave morality and the Noble morality. These two types of morality are at odds with each other, the slave morality develops specifically as a result of the critique of the master morality.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche's Lightning

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When describing the lightning and the flash, Nietzsche is alluding to the human tendency to disassociate two things that are related. This may be because lightning is the descriptor and the flash is the action, which leads humans to separate the two. Nietzsche describes this mental process as “taking the latter for an action… separates. strength from expression of strength.” The lightning and the flash is related to the lambs and the birds of prey because it is impossible to separate, and blame, the birds of prey from their strength: their tendencies to kill. It would be as equally impossible to separate and blame the lambs for their weakness as their weakness functions as a way to protect themselves. The lambs do not understand this and thus…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christianity as antiquity.-- When we hear the ancient bells growling on a Sunday morning we ask ourselves: Is it really possible! This, for a jew, crucified two thousand years ago, who said he was God's son? The proof of such a claim is lacking. Certainly the Christian religion is an antiquity projected into our times from remote prehistory; and the fact that the claim is believed - whereas one is otherwise so strict in examining pretensions - is perhaps the most ancient piece of this heritage. A god who begets children with a mortal woman; a sage who bids men work no more, have no more courts, but look for the signs of the impending end of the world; a justice that accepts the innocent as a vicarious sacrifice; someone who orders his disciples to drink his blood; prayers for miraculous interventions; sins perpetrated against a god, atoned for by a god; fear of a beyond to which death is the portal; the form of the cross as a symbol in a time that no longer knows the function and ignominy of the cross -- how ghoulishly all this touches us, as if from the tomb of a primeval past! Can one believe that such things are still believed?…

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nietzsche here specifies that his task is not simply to expose the psychological and historical eventuality that make for different moralities, but to question moralities for their objective value. It is exposed how a particular morality comes from a tradition. Nietzsche states how the only thing that matters is their current, actual functional value in objective terms, and their potential functional value. The work can be used to determine whether the values of the road’s protagonist’s actions are subjective, meaning they fit the characters needs. It can also be used to determine if there is any source of absolute morality in the novel.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anticrist Summery

    • 2411 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Nietzsche claimed in the Foreword to have written the book for a very limited readership. In order to understand the book, he asserted that the reader "... must be honest in intellectual matters to the point of hardness to so much as endure my seriousness, my passion." The reader should be above politics and nationalism. Also, the usefulness or harmfulness of truth should not be a concern. Characteristics such as "Strength which prefers questions for which no one today is sufficiently daring; courage for the forbidden" are also needed.…

    • 2411 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nietzsche was an immoral reprobate who went completely insave from syphillis before he died. Ad Hominem (Abusive)…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral Dilemas: Antigone

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the most difficult trials I face in my life are ethical and moral dilemmas. I believe one purpose for this life is to learn to act for ourselves and learn to see a situation correctly and act righteously. Everyday I'm faced with decisions of right and wrong, most of which are easily and correctly dealt with. Sometimes however, decisions need to be made that are not easy or perfectly clear. In this paper I wish to discuss a presented moral dilemma and explain what I would do in the same situation.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics