Preview

Nickolas Kristof's 'Environmental Balance, Pick Up A Rifle'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
759 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nickolas Kristof's 'Environmental Balance, Pick Up A Rifle'
Mo Roga
Ms. Duffy
English 112
11/28/13
“For Environmental Balance, Pick Up a Rifle”
Nickolas Kristof starts out his article by briefly quizzing the reader on general knowledge that he soon tries to challenge. Followed by his main argument led by an interesting title he chose when he decided to incorporate “picking up a rifle” with “environmental balance”. In doing this, the author makes it clear from the get-go that he stands firm with the belief that hunting is a logical solution to the issue of environmental balance. His solution to this problem is simply, Achieving environmental balance by the means of hunting; which could also be seen as the main thesis to this essay. Immediately, the author identifies the issue that he is set
…show more content…
To do our part in keeping balance to the populations we’ve offset. As Kristof put it “it’s an abdication of environmental responsibility to eliminate other predators and then refuse to assume the job ourselves. In that case, the collisions with humans will simply get worse.” I also found myself in compliance with Kristof’s assumption that people these days would look at hunting more as a barbaric action rather than a necessary one for ecological balance. Looking at both sides of the opinion of hunting in today’s society the authors makes it clear that he doesn’t expect the idea to make sense to people who may hold an ignorant stance when challenged with his proposal. Kristof was sure to include this when talking about where people may stand on this topic in an everyday life setting “Granted, hunting isn’t advisable in suburban backyards, and I don’t expect many soccer moms to install gun racks in their minivans.” I believe his humorous tone while explaining his opinion of the need to kill animals in to achieve positive environmental results is appropriate in the way he expresses the logical irony of his claim. A Claim made strong by ending it with a real example of how this problem can literally come crashing into our homes of not dealt with in the right way, the way the Author deemed as a logical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Wolf Hunting Case Study

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Case study 1 examines the current debate on wolf hunting taking place in Michigan. Wolves impact the ecosystems in which they live by keeping the role of predator and prey in balance. There must be enough wolves (supply) to fulfil this role (demand). The legalization of wolf hunting may not directly relate to economics but can be used to compare balancing an ecosystem versus balancing the market. The economic problem presented in the video is how to go about maintaining this balance. When natural resources are scarce who should make the decisions on how to use these resources individuals or the government.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dappled Grackle

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He is forgetting the harmful effects of hunting and his assumptions are not well substantiated with any evidence. The writer is making an analogy that the same provisions as that of the Wayne County in the Gordon act can prevent the decline in these birds. The writer is assuming that similar environmental conditions exists in both these Counties. Here, the diversity of the species of birds,animal and trees in both must be considered and a detailed study is required which can predict the cause and effect if such amendments are made in the Gordon…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There was a time when man killed animals for food, clothing and shelter. Now people kill animals for trophies and to stroke their egos for bragging rights. “Every year, tens of thousands of wild animals, representing hundreds of different species, are killed by American trophy hunters in foreign countries” (“Trophy Hunting”). “The heads, hides, tusks, and other body parts of most of these animals are legally imported to the United States by the hunters” (“Trophy Hunting”). “Many animals imported as trophies are members of species protected under the Endangered Species Act, such as leopards and African elephants” (“Trophy Hunting”). These facts provide evidence that…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolf Family Values

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Levy focuses her article on the importance of wolf family values, and the importance of wolves in an ecosystem. She also uses an ethical appeal by arguing that “The hunting of wolves warps their social structure, ripping apart family ties and traditions that define wolf society.” Levy connects to her audience’s moral values of family and traditions that not only humans have but wolves too. By explaining that hunting wolves are harming the structure of wolf society, she also expresses the effects it has on the ecosystem. Levy states that “ Older wolves pass knowledge down to younger pack members, and that human hunting disrupts this natural order.” This statement explains that by us, humans, killing of wolf packs and not protecting the wolf population it is unbalancing the natural order of life. Throughout her article Levy continues to plead her case as to why we should protect the pack. She uses two different types of wolves, a grey wolf pack from Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming, and eastern wolf pack from Algonquin Provincial Park in Ontario, Canada. Both of these studies showed that “intact wolf packs boost the diversity of plants and songbirds, and increase populations of beaver and amphibians, all by limiting the numbers and grazing patterns of elk and other large…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Robinson, John G. "The responsibility to conserve wild species - A Consideration of Policy Implications: A Panel Discussion - In the Company of Animals". Social Research. 1995: n.pag. SIRS Issues Researcher. 31 Mar, 2012.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Enviormental Action. “Killing Wolves is not Cool.” Environmental Action. 2011. Web. 25 April 2012. <http://environmental-action.org/action/killing-wolves-not-cool>.…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many animals endure prolonged, painful deaths when they are injured but not killed by hunters. What the author fails to consider is that most people that hunt are not hunting to just kill most are trying to feed there family or put meat in there fridge. According to peta the delicate balance of ecosystems ensures their survival if they are left unaltered. Natural predators help maintain this balance by killing only the sickest and weakest individuals. Hunters, however, kill any animal whose head they would like to hang over the fireplace including large, healthy animals who are needed to keep the population strong. Although this may be true the ecosystem is going to kill off populations a lot slower than kill animals such as deer are self, killing isn't bad if you using the deer for good causes.On private lands that are set up as for-profit hunting reserves or game ranches, hunters can pay to kill native and exotic species in “canned hunts.” This is true, but people that go out and hunt in canned hunts usually after they kill a deer they give the meat to share your harvest and help families in need.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A signal wolf can eat 20 to 25 pounds of meat at one time and go to weeks without eating. One wolf will kill 15-19 animals a year. There is 2200 wolves In Minnesota which means that they kill around 41,800 deer a year. But in Minnesota there are 1 million white tail deer there. I’m not saying that the only thing killing the deer population the United States are wolves because the coyotes kill some to and the biggest predator is the human race. When people go out and hunt it is for the meat and not for just fun and the government tells us how many animals can be killed so it’s not like we just go out and kill them as we see them they only give us so many tags. But in my family we hunt for the horns and meat because it is like a thing to talk about when people come over and we can share the memory. If we let the wolfs keep eating the deer and elk not much longer deer and elk are going to be on the endanger species list to because the wolf’s are killing them and that means that the wolf will stay on the list because they don’t have enough food so that adds two more species to the…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keeping the population balanced by hunting really only counts for some animals such as deer. If we didn't hunt deer there would be too many and eventually they would starve to death. However, lion hunting is entirely different. There are only about 30,000 lions left which is means they are endangered. If a hunter kills a male lion that is a leader of the pack, the rest of the lions are open for the kill of other animals which leads to more deaths of lions, which brings the number of their population down and can eventually lead to extinction.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hunting can be used in many different ways that all have a positive effect on the environment. Hunting is helpful in many positive ways to keep the environment clean and healthy. Hunting has been used since the beginning of time and has always been here. Throughout the years, there have been many different groups of people that are pro-hunting and many different groups that have been against hunting. Since hunting began, many of the people who are pro-hunting has kept the environment clean and healthy. Hunting has many positive effects on the environment that are beneficial. Some of these benefits include but are not limited to the large economic benefit to the wildlife conservation through hunting equipment taxes, hunting license sales, and usage fees. Other benefits of hunting is all the money that is spent yearly by hunters on equipment, hunting trips, and guide services. Hunters also contribute highly to keeping the environment clean and healthier by donating and contributing large sums of time and money to hunter run conservation groups that work to help increase natural wildlife habitats and populations (Hunting Benefits 1). An environment that is considered to be “good” would be one that involves situations of activities that maintain wildlife at current levels. Which means hunting is positive for the environment because the hunting community helps ensure that the wildlife populations of all the different types of game is kept in good conditions and can be proven to survive from this generation to the next (Gibbons 1). This means that hunters have to keep a variety of natural habitats to be kept intact, unpolluted, and undisturbed by unnatural forces. All of which hunters support these efforts (Gibbons 1). Wildlife hunting in all aspects plays a major role in helping keep the environment as clean and natural as…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Persuasive Speech: Hunting

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    i. Since the dawn the of time, We have had hunters hunting buffallo, elk, deer, any kind of beast that would support their family. Is that right? In some cases yes, if its to support your family and feed so many people of a certain group or community. Plus you dont want animals to over populate us humans correct? Hunting can definitely keep down the population such as the deer population, hunters say that since the population of wolves and cougars are down they the hunters need to take place of the wolves and cougars and keep the deer population down. (Lin, Doris) It will definitely give you something to think about. Do we want to get overpopulated by animals?…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although there are exceptions of hunters not presented in this article, including those who kill animals solely for the “thrill of the hunt”, or just because sport hunting has gained popularity as modern firearms make it more convenient to kill. In her article “Sport Hunting Is an Unnecessary Form of Cruelty to Animals”, Dawn Laney argues that the practice of hunting for sporting purposes defeats the meaning of hunting and causes animals' pain and suffering in the last minutes of their lives. Some would agree with the fact that not every shot that a hunter makes is a kill shot; however, there are always reasons for the bullet to miss the intended target; like an unsighted scope, high winds, and movement of the animal when the shot is fired. Also, keeping farm–raised animals herded into confinement will result in unnecessary brutality; whipping and thrashing the animals for direction, branding the animal, gauging the ears for identification, and trapping them in quarters so tight they can hardly move. Furthermore, author and primatologist Jane Goodall stresses how hunting around the world is “driving species to extinction”. It cannot be denied that exotic animal hunting can lead to low population numbers, however in most cases, this is an act of poaching rather than hunting. A poacher is…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Three out of four Americans approve of hunting, partly because hunters are America’s greatest positive force for conservation.” -- Hunting in America: An Economic Force for Conservation. The way of hunting began simple. This sport provides us with food and clothes, but many people oppose hunting. People think the idea of killing animals for sport is cruel and inhumane. Hunting is forbidden in national parks and frowned upon by animal rights groups. Hunting benefits more than people think. Hunting helps habitat conservation, feed families, and is a popular sport around the world.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animals and their habitats should not be disturbed by humans. For example, humans are destroying the homes and habitats of animals. The arcticle, 'The Impact of Animal Protection', says "Throughout history, human activites have changed or destroyed the habitats that animals need to survive". Some of the activites that have caused the loss of animals and their habitiats are cutting down trees for lumber, construction of roads and buildings, and hunting animals for…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay Hunting

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the article, “Why Sport Hunting is Cruel and Unnecessary”, the author wrote, “In 2006, then-Vice President Dick Cheney famously shot a friend while hunting quail on a canned hunting preserve...thousands of injuries are attributed to hunting in the U.S. every year-and that only includes incidents involving humans.” This shows that people have gone big game hunting and injured other hunters instead of animals. So many people have gotten injured due to major mistakes while hunting. It is immoral to hurt other innocent people when hunting because the goal of the hunt is to get animals, not humans. Other hunters are putting their lives at risk when they go big game hunting since other people are also competing to hunt the big game. If these mistakes repetitively happen, human population may decrease just because of hunting. In conclusion, not only does big game hunting decrease animal population, but it may decrease human populations because of major hunting…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays