Preview

Niccolo Machiavelli: The Father Of Modern Political Characteristics

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1444 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Niccolo Machiavelli: The Father Of Modern Political Characteristics
It is best to be both feared and loved; however, if one cannot be both it is better to be feared than loved.
Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli was born during the renaissance era of Italy in Florence during the 15th century, on 3rd May 1469. Regardless of his cliché image of a cynic, or his name being directly synonymous to devil, Machiavelli did establish himself as an everlasting political figure. Often referred as the father of modern political theory, Niccolo lived years pulling of numerous duties such as that of a historian, diplomat, philosopher and writer. Irrespective of being born into an impoverished family, he did receive a par excellence education, being strictly trained and taught grammar and Latin.
In 1494, the Medici family
…show more content…
The growing popularity of Machiavelli’s influential words was taken as a threat and considered dangerous, hence in the second half of the sixteenth century many of his political papers were added to the Church Index of Banned Books. Machiavelli also authored Biographies (Life of Castruccio Castracani), Social history (The history of Florence) and one of the most famous play of the century, Mandragola. His personal, political and diplomatic experiences are described in his book Discourses on Livy, from a relatively methodical point of view. The book examines lessons of contemporary as well as ancient history. Machiavelli used his experiences combined with historical facts to produce, what according to him, were the ideal rules of a government.
Discourses on Livy has been viewed by many as a gateway to modern republicanism and hence it could be taken into consideration as a factual representation of Niccolo Machiavelli’s republican point of view, in contrast to The Prince, which depicts an inclination towards satire. However, this possibility does not defy the fact that Discourses on Livy does manage to incorporate unscrupulous
…show more content…
Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson adopted Niccolo’s republican strategies once they were threatened by an emerging aristocracy. John Adams was possibly the only Founding Father who deeply examined and valued Machiavelli’s political philosophy and research. His appreciation took the form of his treatise ‘A Defense of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America’.
Niccolo Machiavelli was an out of the ordinary man. What he saw was conveyed through his innumerable works, and irrespective of all the criticism he managed to gather, Machiavelli pinpointed the reality of a political environment. Though initially being associated with pejorative meanings, Machiavellianism has started to become a major topic of discussion between modernist intellectuals. Who he really was is still perhaps a mystery, but the fact that what he provided in his works on sustaining authority and command has effectively percolated into modern politics, cannot be easily disregarded.
‘Politics have no relations to morals’-Niccolo

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Contrary to popular belief, Machiavelli is not a diabolic political figure in search of power. He is instead an astute politician who uses his extensive knowledge of politics to analyze various princes and principalities in order to educate future…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli was at his time and continues to be now days one of the most influential and revolutionary authors known throughout the centuries. His writings, distinct from other renaissance authors of the epoch, make emphasis on his personal views and his opinions on the political matters taking place in Florence, Italy. Further discussed in the text are two of Machiavelli’s most renowned works, The Prince and the Discourses on Livy. Both books comprehend Machiavelli’s understandings of politics and explicit analysis on the various methods of governments with respect to principalities and republics.…

    • 2153 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli – a diplomat exposed to decadent, cynical of the true nature of humanity, reflecting darker aspects of Humanism that man is essentially corrupt, self-serving and treacherous…

    • 1311 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His writings are maddeningly and notoriously unsystematic, inconsistent and sometimes self-contradictory. He tends to appeal to experience and example in the place of rigorous logical analysis. Yet succeeding thinkers who more easily qualify as philosophers of the first rank did (and do) feel compelled to engage with his ideas, either to dispute them or to incorporate his insights into their own teachings. Machiavelli may have grazed at the fringes of philosophy, but the impact of his musings has been widespread and lasting. The terms “Machiavellian” or “Machiavellism” find regular purchase among philosophers concerned with a range of ethical, political, and psychological phenomena, even if Machiavelli did not invent “Machiavellism” and may not even have been a “Machiavellian” in the sense often ascribed to him.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Niccolỏ Machiavelli’s lifetime, Italy’s city-states were in turmoil, and he was extremely interested in the politics behind the chaos.1 Machiavelli advised principalities on the proper way to conduct themselves by using his study of human nature. His understanding of human greed, disloyalty, and predictability created a vision of politics that utilizes power for a prince to maintain stability. Machiavelli created power-politics, his vision of how to stabilize a principality, in The Prince.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is Machiavelli’s attitude toward mankind? Does his view of man’s relation to fortune reflect optimism or pessimism?…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: Many people who have read The Prince by Niccoló Machiavelli were appalled by Machiavelli’s fierce and authorative tone he used to assert his ideas, especially his concept of how the ends justify the means, which slowly made people begin to criticize him and his book as immoral, wicked, and evil. For this reason, Machiavelli began to be insulted as a ruthless and evil person, or in the adopted term, a Machiavellian. Machiavelli didn’t wish to care for morals or spiritual integrity; however, he didn’t arrange to establish the approach to wickedness. As a matter of fact, he argues that the concept the ends justify the means are meant to be followed, but only when necessary commands for it to happen.…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli wrote and studied the change in political beliefs in France and Italy. Machiavelli was a descendant from Florence like Dante but Machiavelli came from a different political climate. Florence had changed many times since Dante’s oligarchy succumbed to the power of rich Signori who gained control of the councils of government. The Signori passed laws that had the upper classes fight to take away power from the lower classes. Slowly the oligarchy became a monarchy with fake republics to be able to give the people a place to air their grievances.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli’s treatise responds to the instability and vulnerability of Florence as it faced infighting and external threats following the collapse of the republic where Machiavelli held a vanquished position. The Prince is written with a blunt direct style, free from the ‘unnecessary ornamentation’ in order to plainly represent in the same way he wishes the Medici to rule. As a result of the political context, Machiavelli’s work warns that if a Prince ‘tries to be good all the time’ he will ‘come to ruin among the great number who are not good.’ Machiavelli stresses the necessity of pragmatism as he opposes the laws of man incorporate “living with integrity” with the beast disregarding these principles by thinking “little about keeping faith”. Machiavelli also suggests the people are the foundations of a principality since a Prince ‘who builds his foundations on the people is a man able to command and of spirit, is not bewildered by adversaries, does not fail to make preparations.’ The collective listing of conditions exhibits the difficulty of maintaining stability. Thus, Machiavelli’s Prince is a Sisyphean character as he constantly toils to defend his principality and uphold rule whilst establishing foundations to be inevitably destroyed. The weak nature of power lies within the absence of expansion beyond the foundations which is also a discreet criticism of the futility of the elite ruling class at maintaining stability. Thus, the bleak and barren landscape depicted in Machiavelli’s The Prince is a symbolic representation of the instability within Renaissance Italy and the ineffectiveness of power in establishing enduring political…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Niccolio Machiavelli (Born May 3rd, 1469 – 1527 Florence, Italy.) His writings have been the source of dispute amongst scholars due to the ambiguity of his analogy of the ‘Nature of Politics” and the implication of morality. The Prince, has been criticised due to it’s seemingly amoral political suggestiveness, however after further scrutiny of other works such as The Discourses, one can argue that it was Machiavelli’s intention to infact imply a positive political morality. Therefore the question needs to be posed. Is Machiavelli a political amoralist? To successfully answer this it is essential to analyse his version of political structure to establish a possible bias. It would also be beneficial to discuss and compare another philosopher’s account to the nature of politics, and in this instance I have chosen the works of Plato in particular The Republic, establishing a comparison to define whom has the more convincing argument and why?…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Since love and fear can hardly exist together, if we must choose between them, it's far safer to be feared than loved” -Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince. Niccolo Machiavelli was born on May 3, 1469 in Florence, Italy and is best known for being a diplomat and writing the manual, The Prince. He was the second son of Bernardo di Nicolo Machiavelli, a repute lawyer, and of Bartolomea di Stefano Nelli, who were members pf the old Florentine nobility. Niccolo had 3 siblings, 2 sisters and a brother, and he started his education at the age of seven with a typical humanist education. His humanist education consisted of learning Latin which he was exceptionally good at and reading the classical Greek and Roman authors especially historic accounts. He also when he was older went and listened to a great deal of lectures by Marcello Virgilio Adriani who chaired the Studio Florentino. His humanist education excluding Greek helped him get a job as an official for the Florentine Chancery.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Cruelty

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout his work “The Prince,” Machiavelli explores the characteristics of an ideal leader and offers practical advice on a variety of matters associated with one’s rise to power. Characteristically, his arguments are straightforward and rational and he frequently employs historical evidence to strengthen them. One profound hypothesis presents itself in Chapter VIII of this political discourse in which Machiavelli focuses on the necessary evil of cruelty in a position of leadership.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: The Prince

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout my reading of Machiavelli, a particular selection struck me as very interesting. This comes from Chapter 17 when Machiavelli states, “Here a question arises: whether it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse. The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being loved. . . . Love endures by a bond, which men, being scoundrels, may break whenever it serves their advantage to do so; but fear is supported by the dread of pain, which is ever present (Machiavelli 54). I believe this is an interesting question that would be a good topic for debate. Regarding this question, I side with Machiavelli on his reasoning that it is more beneficial to be feared then loved with regards to obedience. Examples of this principle can be seen in our world today. Laws demonstrate this very well. Laws are present to keep society in order, and with disobedience comes penalties. These penalties are what make people obey the law. Without penalties, or using the term pain in an exaggerated sense, most people would continue to break the law being aware that there are no consequences. Fear is what fuels laws to be effective.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s essay, “The Qualities of the Prince” is a very interesting piece of literary work that has an atypical way of depicting the qualities of a successful leader. Machiavelli developed a way of thinking that changes the human perspective on what a quality leader is made of. He took what people were afraid to say aloud and voiced it in a way that almost unraveled the truth about what people in power were really like. Machiavelli comes to a junction is his essay when he writes; “being disarmed makes you despised”. When Machiavelli says this he means to say that in order for someone to appear powerful they must be armed and physically capable of warfare. In his essay he very clearly portrays that in order for someone to have control and ultimate power, they must have the means to start a war.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays