Preview

Newspaper commentary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
309 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Newspaper commentary
Summary :
In the wake of Japan's nuclear crisis,Germany decided to stop the use of nuclear power by 2022. Some experts think that Germany's phase-out plan is an unwise decision and they pointed out the correct action is to take a pause and learn lessons after Fukushima but not close down nuclear power. And some say Germany's phase-out plan will also risk boosting greenhouse gas emissions by helping fossil fuel producers.

Comment :
In my own opinions, I support Germany's decision of planning to shut down its nuclear plants. Chernobyl disaster and Japan's nuclear crisis has told us how dangerous the nuclear power is ,and what are the adverse and potential impacts of nuclear disaster. It is time for us to learn lessons from the incidents and gradually quit the use of nuclear power. It is irresponsible for those countries which still support nuclear power. They should have noticed that once there was a nuclear incident, it will not only be a regional crisis. Besides, the loss and impacts caused by the nuclear incident are unpredictable and wide.

Some may say nuclear incident is preventable. However, no one could promise and guarantee that there will not be any nuclear incident, right? Then, please say no to atomic energy. Certainly, it is impossible for us to stop using nuclear energy and pull down all the nuclear power plants in no time. On the contrary, It takes times and determination to get rid of the dependence on nuclear power.

Also, some may concerns that pulling the plug on nuclear power will boost the uses of fossil fuels and thus increase the emissions of greenhouse gases. Yet I think it is a good chance for the governments to speed up the development and wider the use of renewable energy.

Nuclear power can bring benefits to us, however, the cost behind it is too costly.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There are further issues implied by the trend shown for nuclear power. The use of nuclear power has fluctuated in the past 60 years, rising by 10 million tonnes between 1970 and 1990, and then decreasing back 10 million tonnes by 2030. This is because the first stations in operation at 1990 had a short life and are now beginning to expire. This poses an issue for energy security in the UK as even with immediate investment into nuclear energy; the stations take 15-20 years to build. This leaves a gap as shown in the trend (nuclear only at 10 million tonnes in 2030) where the UK will be without nuclear power, irrelevant of…

    • 619 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to remain at the forefront of technological innovation and industrial prowess, the United States must become cognizant that the use of nuclear energy is by far the most efficient policy regarding the creation of power despite the possible risks. This is the belief of William Tucker, the author of the New York Times published article, “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even after Fukushima”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear powers biggest threat is from the public’s perception of it. As seen in Germany as well as throughout Europe, if the public deems something too unsafe and does not want to live near it, the governments will have no choice but to shut down the plants and look for different sources of energy. Compared to biofuels and solar power, nuclear power is already extremely established and generates a large share of the worlds’ power, and faces most of its issues in the political realm instead of the practical…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No new nuclear power plants should be built because the increasing energy demand in the United States can be met with less negative environmental impact with power generated by renewable sources such as wind, solar, and tidal power. The “zero emissions” benefit of nuclear energy is a common misconception. The actual reaction in a nuclear power plant only creates steam and radioactive waste; it does not produce greenhouse gasses or particulate matter that the combustion of fossil fuels creates. But, due to reliance on existing fossil-fuel power for plant construction, decommissioning, and fuel processing as well as the mining, enrichment, and transport of uranium, the nuclear…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While there is no doubting that solar and wind will create jobs and bring in its own income, ultimately nuclear power will be more beneficial for the United States. In order to bring wind generated energy production up the tax payer will pay a heavy price, to raise the wind energy production level from just 1.5% to 4% over the next ten years it will cost at least $29 billion in federal subsidies (Alexander). Nuclear power is better suited for the economy as it is a cheaply produced source of energy, yet the United States is not capitalizing on it. This lack of nuclear energy investment on the United States is resulting in other countries to capture the benefits of this cheap energy source; China, Russia and Japan are all cashing in on nuclear power for its cheap energy. The benefit of cheap energy is that energy intensive industries have an incentive to set up sites using nuclear energy for the lessened power bill they have to pay. If other countries continue to produce cheap energy American industries may want to consider moving to these countries with lower energy costs. If businesses move over seas the United States losses jobs to other countries and we are no better…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power’s bad reputation has come about due to the accident at nuclear plants such as Chernobyl in Ukraine, Fukushima in Japan and Three Mile Island in the USA. Chernobyl was one of the only ones out of three that has been classified as a “major accident” by The International Atomic Energy Agency; the other was the accident at Fukushima. The reason the Chernobyl accident was considered a “major accident”, was due to the emergency shutdown failing, with a full melt down being achieved. This area is not able to be populated ever again due to the extreme…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. In “Small Recactors Make a Bid to Revive Nuclear Power”, the Obama Administration and the Energy Department are working on making America the leader in advanced nuclear technology and manufacturing (Biello 2012). They are considering switching the large reactors, which are currently the predominant technology, to small reactors, which will save money. These reactors would contain enough power to power more than 200,000 U.S. homes for a year (Biello 2012). This strategy will cause less nuclear waste and will increase safety issues as well. In another article, “Time to revive, not kill, the nuclear age”, it is stated that a world without nuclear power would be less secure. Neither fossil fuels nor renewable resources will be able to replace the 14 percent of global electricity generated by nuclear reactors (Financial Times 2011). This article sides with MacFarlane by saying the Chernobyl accident was bad, but since then things…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Final Critical Assignment

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main issue of the article is whether or not we should increasingly rely on nuclear power and make it our No1 source of energy given endless concerns about its safety and expensive cost. Undoubtedly, in a world of increasing population, diminishing natural resources and worsening climate change, nuclear energy is considered the key future energy resolution. In favor of greater reliance on nuclear energy, Mark Lynas – a climate-science author strongly brought in the reasons of: 1st, nuclear power avoiding climate change while fossil fuels have failed to do so and green energy capability is still being questioned; 2nd, opponents overstating danger even after many reactors has been safety improved; 3rd, the cost is acceptable comparing to other renewables energy. In contrast, Peter A.Bradford – former commissioner of the U.S.Nulear Regulatory Commission insisted in the alternatives, arguing that nuclear power is too costly to be pursued, not to mention its danger and potential severe impacts on people’s health. Obviously, the need of understanding the issue from comprehensive perspectives with substantial data support is essential to weigh the risks and benefits of each opinion.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, nuclear power is too expensive. For instance “Many supporters and critics say nuclear power biggest impediment is economic.”(8,8) Even people who agree with nuclear power agree that the cost is too high the amount of workers and materials that will be needed and how long the process is too much money for the economy. Like this quote states “But in reality is wasting yet more time and money pursuing the nuclear nightmare would be, too expensive, too risky.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The good things about nuclear energy start with the environmental benefits. If done right, nuclear power will emit less than one one-hundredth of the green house gasses than coal or gas power. Coal and oil plants emit large amounts of CO2, which is proven to cause global warming, while nuclear energy creates no CO2 emissions. Compared to coal, natural gas, wind, and solar power, nuclear energy per kWh (kilowatt-hour) is the cheapest to produce. Although the running cost of nuclear power plants is already low, we are striving to lower the cost further by using new technology and by trying to better understand how nuclear energy works.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Plants

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The question of whether the U.S. should have nuclear power plants is very controversial. There are two sides that one can take; however, both sides have their own share of problems. If you chose to not have nuclear plants, then eventually all natural resources will run out. The oil supply will run out relatively soon, and all other sources will run out too. The natural resources that we have now are still harmful to the earth however. The gas which we use for our cars pollutes the air and considering the amount of cars the are driven each day, it is ripping apart the o-zone layer. However, if the U.S. does decide to use nuclear plants, then there is a great danger of toxic waste invading our rivers, and also the chance of a spill similar to Chernobyl. As we saw in the Chernobyl video, there is great danger when using nuclear energy. If this were to happen is the United States, the risk of mortality is much higher because the area's in which there would be a plant such as a big city are very densely populated. Because of these facts, I do not think that the U.S. should renew its efforts to develop more nuclear plants.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Along with the advantages of nuclear power, there are also some disadvantages, which we must consider. These may have a very negative effect on our future and other generations to come.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays