Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Nazi Research Experiments

Better Essays
1857 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nazi Research Experiments
"In the interest of...saving lives, is it acceptable to make use of data collected through mutilation, torture, and death" (Campbell, 16)? That is the question which has been rearing its head in scientific research since the end of World War II. As man has sought to quench his thirst for knowledge, lines of ethicality have been drawn to preserve the integrity of science, and provide a framework from which man can improve upon the quality of human life. In Nazi concentration and death camps, the gruesome sibling of science matured. Nazi scientists, physicians, and scholars tore down the ethical framework of science in order to eliminate the genetically inferior, and ultimately, attempt to forge a ‘pure' race of ‘super-humans'. Members of the Nazi scientific community were to serve as "alert biological soldiers" (Crum, 33). These ‘soldiers' conducted research on non-consenting camp inmates in order to "demonstrate a hereditary basis for group differences in behavioral and physical characteristics" in humans (Caplan, 286). The most well known experiments in this regard were the experiments conducted on twins at Auschwitz.
The other goal of the Nazi scientists was to provide human data that could be applied to the war effort. Experimentation of this sort mainly probed the extremes, which the human body could tolerate in a hostile environment. The most famous experiment of this sort was the ‘Dachau Hypothermia Study.' The rationale of the experiments was as follows:
"A consequence of air combat and air campaigns was that pilots were shot down and landed in cold water. In addition, the German Navy was losing a large number of personnel in the cold North Sea. There were no data available to document how long the downed pilots could survive in the frigid North Sea. The solution to these questions, as well as others, was considered important by certain groups of Nazi administrators and scientists. From a historical point of view, at that time, the number of papers that had been published that dealt with human response to cold water and/or air was very limited...therefore, the German scientists were seeking answers to "legitimate scientific goals" (Caplan, 98).

The last line, "...German scientists were seeking answers to ‘legitimate scientific goals'", is the statement which is the prime concern of this paper.
In order to accomplish their ‘goals,' Nazi scientists conducted human experiments, virtually all of which, ended in the subjects' murder. How can answers to ‘legitimate scientific goals' be found in murder? Should these experiments even be considered ‘science'? Furthermore, should these experiments be allowed to provide quotable data to the modern scientific community? The debate on whether or not science should allow referencing to Nazi data rages. Objectors to using Nazi data, state that by using the data from the Nazis' human experimentation, researchers are not only endorsing, but also encouraging future unethical research. In addition, objectors maintain that the Nazi research was poorly designed and conducted so haphazardly, that it really doesn't even qualify as ‘scientific'. They state, "scientific results depended upon protocols which were soaked in iniquity. In many experiments, it was ‘control subjects', denied treatment, who suffered most and died. ‘Sample size' meant truck loads of Jews. ‘Significance' was an indication of misery, and ‘response rate' a measure of torment" (Dixon, 31). Objectors to the use of Nazi research believe that nothing good will come from this research. They believe that using research gathered through murder endorses the methods used in the experiments. If this statement were to be contested, they would argue that to cite research is to say ‘I believe in this work'. To believe in research, one must be inclined to repeat the original work and further investigate the topic. Objectors claim that this condition is never satisfied. They state, "We do not, to be specific, replicate the Nazi experiments. ‘We' do not do it. The Nazis did" (Campbell, 18). Objectors believe that a scientist above all else is a human, thus, he must recognize himself as a moral being. Since humans were murdered in these experiments, the data collected should be considered ‘tainted'. No moral being should associate with tainted data. Objectors also believe that the methodology of these experiments cannot be considered ‘science'. In regard to the infamous hypothermia experiments at Dachau, United States Brigadier General Telford Taylor, claimed that, "these experiments revealed nothing which civilized medicine can use" (Moe, 5). Further opinions from objectors dissect the reliability of the research. Arnold Relman, editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, states that Nazi experiments "are such a gross violation of human standards that they are not to be trusted at all...how can you trust a man who would do that?" (Moe, 6). Therefore, obviously the Nazi data suffers from credibility issues. Another opinion expressed in Moe's article was that "If they [Nazis] had never done these experiments, science would be no different today" (6). It is clear that objectors do not believe that the research done by the Nazis was science. They maintain that the moral and ethical aspects of research must be the motivating factors behind scientific endeavors.
Proponents of Nazi research, on the other hand, argue that the information provided by the Nazis is indispensable to some areas of modern science. Most supporters concede that the data was obtained through gruesome, inhumane means. They point out, however, that such large-scale human experimentation has never been conducted elsewhere. Therefore, because the research is impossible to replicate, scientists have a need, in certain instances, to utilize this research in the interest of saving lives. They further point out that a significant majority of Nazi data "satisfies all the criteria of objective and accurate observation and interpretation" (Moe, 6).
Proponents favor salvaging all the good that they can out of the murder of camp inmates. Angell states "we should redeem whatever small benefits we can from the nightmare" (1462). An example would be the case of the Dachau hypothermia experiments. In these experiments inmates were outfitted in German pilot gear and then submerged at various depths in ice water pools. All of the subjects died. Today, the only documented data on human hypothermia has been either extrapolated from animal data, or gathered from accident reports. In the case of the animal data, researchers must make many assumptions that cannot be proven to be correct. Therefore, the data, which is generated, is subject to error. Accidental exposure to hypothermia that has been documented through accident reports gives greater insight but still suffers from a major problem. The core temperature of the victim is known only in two states, before and after the exposure. Therefore, only guesses can be made as to how the body reacts to deadlier temperature drops. John S. Hayward of the University of Victoria, uses the Nazi data. He uses it to obtain cooling curves, which help him, design protective suits which will protect people at deadly temperatures. He states, "I don't want to have to use this data, but there is no other and will be no other in an ethical world...to not use it would be equally bad. I'm trying to make something constructive of it" (Moe, 5). Some scholars argue that Nazi research ending in murder is no different, in terms of outcome, too military service. They argue that the differences between war and Nazi research are a means to the same end. They argue, "Some people were ordered to face bullets and storm a hill; others were...to take an injection and test a vaccine...[researchers] did not need to seek the permission of their subjects any more than the...field commanders" (Rothman, 1198). Hence, proponents might argue that to cite Nazi research would be very similar to citing the historical significance of a battle. Proponents also argue that Nazi research was conducted through a scientific method, the data collected was accurate, and therefore, these experiments should indeed, be considered science. Proponents argue that propaganda was likely used to mold opinion in regards to the Nazi research. They believe "denial of scientific validity of Nazi research may have become entrenched partly to distance the Nazi doctors from postwar researchers" (Moe, 5). In addition, proponents argue that the following conclusions can be made in regards to scientific validity of the research:
"1. There was a rationale for the experiments;
The experiments were conducted by trained scientists who had experience in [that] area of science...
The data was presented to various scientific audiences in Nazi Germany
The information has been referenced by scientists since World War II who are knowledgeable in this area; and
No one has scientifically debunked the major findings" (Caplan, 102)
From this evidence, proponents therefore adhere to their beliefs that the Nazi research should be considered science. Supporting one view in this debate is most likely not the correct solution. Instead, researchers must determine on their own what significance their actions hold. In this way, the topic evolves. To censor the use of Nazi data is retroactive to science. As Buchanan states, "If exclude from use all the experiments now viewed as unethical, you'd have to tear up half the medical textbooks" (Moe, 7). However, some believe to cite Nazi research is "to become an onlooker, and beyond that, an accomplice" (Campbell, 18). Most uninformed individuals believe that this debate really has no significance to them. In speaking with peers, many are of the attitude, ‘Who cares? The Nazis lost the War. It's all in the past, its not like that stuff happened anywhere else.' It is important to note however, that even in a democracy such as the U.S., this kind of research has happened. This nation, which condemned the Nazis and passed Nuremburg Laws to safeguard science, has a checkered past of unethical research. Examples are widespread, ranging from the radiation experiments conducted on the victims at Nagasaki and Hiroshima, to the injection of retarded individuals (institutionalized U.S. citizens) with various diseases such as malaria, dysentery, and influenza. Clearly, the Nazi research is not isolated in time or geography. Regretfully, a conclusion cannot be drawn from the argument of citing Nazi research. Being too quick to censor Nazi cited research could be deleterious not only to science but also to society as a whole. Crum warns that "in the Western world there is a form of anti-Nazi ‘bigotry'...that could lead us to adopt the same erroneous public policies ourselves" (31). Being too relaxed in the standards of scientific research, on the other hand, allows the possibility of repeating history. Safeguards, must be in place to discourage and punish acts of unethical research, otherwise people could once again find themselves in the grasp of horrific experimenters. It must be understood that the Nazis were human, their experiments had goals, and they sought knowledge much like scholars of the present. Therefore instead of censoring and debating, maybe, "We should make an effort to stop using the experience of Nazism as a metaphor for ‘The Cosmic Evil' and instead try to read it like a warning label on a bottle under our own kitchen sinks" (Crum, 31).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over the years, it has been said that science could not progress without testing. It has been debated that in the name of progress and the improvement of human living conditions, the ends justify the means. However, when that line begins to blur and Doctors forget the reasons behind their actions we result in some of the the worst medical experiments. The Nazi Party, in power from 1933 to 1945, when he was doomed to extinction after the Allied victory in World War II, it has passed into history as responsible for some of the worst atrocities of which man is capable of.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nazis during their holocaust of the Jews, the systematic state-sponsored killing of six million Jewish men, women, and children and millions of others by Nazi Germany and its collaborators during World War II., medically experimented with their captives. They experimented in various ways, including how to combat hypothermia. These experiments left massive amounts of dead test subjects. All of these atrocities committed in the name of preserving the Aryan race and the Third Reich.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nazis had many motivations for performing medical experiments on various groups of people during the Holocaust. Such motivations included collecting data in order to aid the German army, finding effective methods of treatment for diseases in a purely scientific attempt, and discovering techniques to bolster the Nazi racist beliefs. Additionally, the Nazis executed such experiments to determine the most productive strategy in mass elimination.…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, Nazi’s doctors took advantage of the prisoners using them as test subjects for their own experiments. For war purposes, German physicians tested multiple scenarios that might occur while fighting. In the article Josef Mengele, by Michael Berenbaum, explains,…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article Nazi Scientists and Ethics of Today is about hoe after the holocaust and the brutal experiments on Jews and gypsies. Scientists are trying to find ethical questions on Nazi data. Using the data of the Nazi's scientists might fine a way to change a baby's characteristics , although they are frightened people might abuse these new findings. The way how Nazi scientists and ethics of today are similar with The Strange Case of Mr. Hyde and Dr.Jekyll is the idea's and issues they both had. In the article they stated that they might be able to figure out a way to choose height, eye color, intelligence level and their athletic ability in their child. They might be able to change a baby's characteristics and parts of a baby's personality. Dr.Jekyll was able to take half of his personality and move it to another man, which was Mr. Hyde. In the article they discussed that if the data should be taboo, they did not want this data to hurt other. Dr.Jeyll kept his information hidden because he didn't want people to find out about he has found. He was frightened on how people would react if they did found out the truth. The scientists in the article were unsure of how to control or use the data. Just like Dr.Jekyll did not know how to control Mr. Hyde from hurting people.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Germany during World War II was extremely ruthless and unsafe. The country, military, officials, physicians, and other leaders showed that they clearly valued German lives over all others. In particular, the doctors and military used prisoners at the Dachau concentration camp to conduct experiments on vulnerable, helpless individuals. The main project focused on at this camp was the immersion-hypothermia project conducted during August 1942 and May 1943. The purpose for the project was to learn how to treat the German air force pilots who had been lost in the extremely cold North Sea.…

    • 1960 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The doctors would do many cruel and unusual experiments.First, they would do freezing water experiments.They would submerge the prisoners inside the freezing water and depending on the situation they would force them to get naked as well.They did this because they wanted to find a cure for hypothermia.This would lead to many deaths and sometimes permanently damage the prisoners bodies.Another thing they would do is high altitude.They did this because they wanted to know what the German pilots experienced and they also wanted to find out the best way to save German pilots.The…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Deadly Deception it is noted that the study persisted through multiple decades and major historic events. An illustration of this is that those involved in conducting the Tuskegee Syphilis Study did not understand or accept that their actions were comparable to those of the Nazis in regards to their treatment of human subjects. The disillusionment of the researchers is apparent through their negligence of laws, facts, and human decency. When the study finally concluded in 1972, the participants were not given an adequate debriefing (p. 47). One subject only found out the truth about the experiment through reading about the twenty-eight deaths in the…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific experiments are performed as a way for humans to understand more about the world in which they live and themselves. However, the thirst for such knowledge has often resulted in ignoring the ethical implications of such experiments and thus has resulted in some of the worst human rights violations. In 1973 the Senate Subcommittee on Health held a series of hearings in an attempt to tackle the conundrum of risk versus reward in medicine and human experimentation. Much knowledge has been reaped from these experiments that have resulted in medicine being able to improve the quality and lifespan of many people’s lives. However, a lot of this knowledge has been gained through the sacrifices of others and sometimes these sacrifices were not made willingly. Thirty years later, Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go attempts to tackle the same conundrum by posing a question to readers that all experimenters…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tuskegee Syphilis Study

    • 2578 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Experimentations on humans have always been met with some degree of suspicion in America. Yet, history recalls several incidents which implicated well –established agencies that have been involved. One such embarrassing incident took place at Tuskegee. This is the story of “Miss Evers Boys.” It has come to symbolize racism in medicine, ethical misconduct in human research, paternalism by physicians and government abuse of vulnerable people.…

    • 2578 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the first semester of freshman year comes to an end, one final paper was required for English 198, an argument for a public audience. This assignment allowed the class to choose their own topic of interest and explore different stylistic choices that had not been available for previous papers. I decided to focus my argument on an issue that had come to my attention in my psychology class. Before regulations had been put in place by government policies, unethical human research took place around the world, specifically at the concentration camps during World War II. It is still in question whether this research should be referred to today due to the inhumane procedures used. I argued that despite the questionable scientific validity of some of the experiments, incompetent Nazi physicians, and dehumanization of the victims, the results of the Nazi experiments should be referred to when further research could result in saving lives. I intended for my argument to be published in The Guardian science blog because the debate rests on psychological principles. Throughout the process of writing this specific paper, along with the rest of the assignments that made up the course, I have learned many aspects of rhetorical analysis…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War two, the nazis captured and imprisoned many people who did not fit into their desired Aryan race or disagreed with their beliefs. During the prisoner’s time alive in concentration camps, some were subjected to horrific experiments. Many of them either died or were left disfigured due to these events. Many of the tests were to benefit the lives of Nazi soldiers. However, some doctors performed the test without a proper reason behind it. An example of how the Nazis felt about the Jews and other races that were considered the 'lesser race’ can be compared to the idea that “ you’re flying outside the hive, talking to humans that attack our homes”(Bee Movie) . The Nazi felt as though the “ lesser race” were destroying their way of life so the sent them off to concentration camps.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Propaganda In The Holocaust

    • 2470 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Medical experimentation was carried not only at Auschwitz but in most of the concentration camps. Experimentation was done on Jewish and non-Jewish victims who did not volunteer or consent to the experiments. It is important to note, that there were three basic types of experimentation that occurred in the concentration camps. The first consists of experiments aimed at facilitating the survival of military personnel. In Dachau, conducted high-altitude experiments, using a low-pressure chamber, to determine the maximum altitude from which crews of damaged aircraft could parashute to safety. In a letter from SS-Untersturmführer Rascher to Reichführer-SS Himmler, in April 1942, Rascher writes:…

    • 2470 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctors In The Holocaust

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The medical experiments can be divided into three categories: 1 - facilitating the survival of German military personnel, 2 - the testing of pharmaceuticals, and 3 - the advancement of the racial tenets of the Nazi worldview (Museum, Nazi Medical Experiments).…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Labs

    • 2720 Words
    • 11 Pages

    These labs seem to be spreading from the southwest in a fan pattern to the north, west and east.…

    • 2720 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics