Preview

Nazi Prosecution

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1554 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nazi Prosecution
What has been achieved by prosecuting Nazis alleged to have committed crimes against the Jews?

"While fighting for victory the German soldier will observe the rules for chivalrous warfare. Cruelties and senseless destruction are below his standard" , or so the commandment printed in every German Soldiers paybook would have us believe. Yet during the Second World War thousands of Jews were victims of war crimes committed by Nazi 's, whose actions subverted the code of conduct they claimed to uphold and contravened legislation outlined in the Geneva Convention. It is this legislature that has paved the way for the Jewish community and political leaders to attempt to redress the Nazi 's violation, by prosecuting individuals allegedly responsible. Convicting Nazi criminals is an implicit declaration by post-World War II society that the Nazi regime 's extermination of over five million Jews won 't go unnoticed.

Many of the alleged Nazi war criminals that were captured had attempted to evade prosecution shortly before the end of the war. Some opted for suicide, rather than risk capture while others used the Austrian and German Underground offers of fake passports and other means of forged identification to assume a new identity . A choice opted for by many, that virtually guaranteed them a new life with remote chance of detection was to travel to the Anglo-American countries after immigration quotas were raised. Over 4000 Nazi criminals sought refuge in Australia . Many lied about their history to gain entry into their new home and proceeded to blend in, unnoticed by our government. They were no longer Nazi criminals but new citizens with a hidden past. Lists of suspected criminals were compiled and alleged perpetrators systematically captured and put to trial.

In 1943, under Soviet leadership the first war crime trials were conducted, however the first trial to involve the Allied powers was the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal in 1945



Bibliography: Aarrons, Mark, Sanctuary! Nazi Fugitives in Australia, William Heinemann, Australia, 1989. Berenbaum, Michael, The World Must Know. The History of the Holocaust as Told in the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Little, Brown & Company, Boston/Toronto/London, 1993. Dawidowicz, Lucy,S., The War Against the Jews 1933-45, Penguin,London, 1987. Dear, I.C.B. (ed), The Oxford Companion to the Second World War, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995, pp.824-826, 1257-1289. Extracts 9.1, 9.2 & 9.3, AIH 152. The Holocaust: The Final Solution and Beyond,1941 - , Deakin University, Geelong, 1997. Kwiet, K., Section 9, 'The prosecution of Nazi war crimes: A never-ending story ', AIH 152. The Holocaust: The Final Solution and Beyond,1941 - , Deakin University, Geelong, 1997. Lord Russell of Liverpool, The Scourge of the Swastika, New Portway, Great Britain, 1985, p.253. Marrus, M. & Paxton R., Vichy France and the Jews, Basic Books Inc. Publishers, New York, 1981. Marrus, Michael R., The Holocaust in History, Penguin, London, 1987. Wiesenthal, Simon, Justice - Not Vengeance, Wiedenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1989.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Christopher Browning’s is an American historian of the holocaust whose research focuses on the Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. He has written extensively about three issues: first, Nazi decision- and policy-making in regard to the origins of the Final Solution; second, the behavior and motives of various middle- and lower-echelon personnel involved in implementing Nazi Jewish policy; and thirdly, the use of survivor testimony to explore Jewish responses and survival strategies.3…

    • 1086 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donald L. Niewyk’s fifth and sixth chapters both deal more with outside perspectives and outside reactions than it does with those who were persecuted. The fifth chapter, “Bystander Reactions,” offers four different arguments as to why bystanders acted they way they did during the Holocaust. The sixth chapter, “Possibilities of Rescue,” discusses three different viewpoints on what foreign governments could have done to prevent the Holocaust. These two chapters conclude Niewyk’s book The Holocaust and wrap up the final sequence of events surrounding the Holocaust and the camps.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    German anti-Semitism played the main role in Holocaust and extermination of Jewish population in Europe during World War 2. There are different views on this subject among historians. Some support the fact that German society was anti-Semitic and ordinary Germans’ hatred towards Jews was the main factor in horrors of Holocaust. One of supporters of this idea is political science professor Daniel Goldhagen. He argues that German citizens were willing to commit all kinds of crimes against European Jewry during years of World War 2. In his article “The Paradigm Challenged” he emphasizes that many books were written about the Holocaust and none of them includes studies of the perpetrators; people who designed and implemented the strategies of mass extermination of Jews. Goldhagen discussed that most scholars have a very strange view on the attitude of perpetrators. In their studies most perpetrators presented as victims of the Nazi regime and social pressure of that time. They made Germans look like they had no choice, but to follow violent and unlawful orders of their leaders. In fact there was always a choice not to kill innocent people. There is no record of anybody from German military being seriously punished for not following the order to kill Jews. Despite that, ordinary German soldiers were killing Jewish people all around the Europe and the Western part of Soviet Union. Also the writers who defense German perpetrators and look for more complicated explanation of their…

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nuremburg Trials

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Holocaust was an unparalleled crime composed of millions of murders imprisonment, racism, and destruction. It destroyed millions of lives and wiped out over six million Jews during the course of World War II under Hitler’s power. The aftermath of these horrific events proved to be a difficult one since no form of punishment could ever suffice to the torture and pain the Nazi’s inflicted on the Jewish Community. This challenge was attempted by the International Military Tribunal (IMT) held at Nuremberg, Germany where they held Nazi’s in court for crimes of war and genocide. These became known as the Nuremburg Trials.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Holocaust: Buchenwald

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages

    <br><li>Gilbert, Martin. The Holocaust - A History of the Jews of Europe During the Second World War. New York: Holt, Reinhardt & Winston, 1985…

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    5. Knopp Guido - Heinrich Himmler in a speech 1942 cited in Hitler’s Holocaust ,English translation published by 2001 by Sutton publishing limited Phoenix mill Thrupp Stroud Gloucestershire 2001…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Millions of people still lost their lives, and these men were the reason why. Justice must be brought to these people. In the article, Opinion: Why Nazi hunting is still a worthy pursuit, it states that even with how much time has passed these men “... are just as guilty today as the day they committed their crime” (Zuroff,Efralm. “Opinion: Why Nazi hunting is still a worthy pursuit.”). As shown, no matter how much time passes, these men still took so many innocent lives. They still should be charged the same with an 80 year difference or an one year difference. Additionally, Ingo Muller claimed that, “We can’t just let it stand that the German judiciary says participating in the Holocaust is not a crime” (Kozlowska, Hanna. “Should We Continue to Prosecute Nazi War Criminals?”). This describes that Germany can not say that men murdering hundreds of people is not a crime, because murdering innocent people is and always will be a crime, even if the murders happened 80 years ago. These people still died, and these men still killed them. No matter what people say, these men are murderers no matter…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Holocaust was one of the most disturbing and petrifying eras of all time. The holocaust, one of the most famous genocides in the world, has showed the world what the evils of man can do to mankind. It was the genocide that killed approximately six million Jews and millions of others in a state-sponsored murder by Nazi Germany led by Adolf Hitler. In a book review of “The Holocaust” by Gilbert Martin, Martin says that, “The Holocaust is the definitive account of what is the most horrifying crime ever committed against humanity”. This brutal torture affected many Jews living in Europe, physically and mentally.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Holocaust was the country that sponsored mass murders for of over six million Jews by the Nazi government during World War II. It was the culmination of close to a decade of official discrimination, racial segregation, and brutal violence against the Jewish residential district in Germany. Under the shield of the war, the Nazis turned to systematic genocide after 1941, setting up industrial-style “extermination camps” planning to execute the detained Jewish population of Germany and Europe. While other groups targeted for extinction by the Nazi state, including gypsies, gays and communists, anti-Semitism was a fundamental tenet of Nazi ideology. In fact, Hitler believed until the end that the “war against the Jews” was a more important goal than victory in the conventional military battles of World War II. The Holocaust is today known as one of the worst mass crimes in human history.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Holocaust War Crimes

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to seek justice for these war crimes, many trials were held. The first declaration officially noting the mass murder of Jews, resolving to prosecute those responsible, was noted on December 17, 1942 by the leaders of the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union (War Crimes Trials). The people responsible for the war crimes were to be sent back to the countries where such crimes haf been committed and judged accordingly to the laws of that nation (War Crimes Trials). Justice was the only reasonable solution to this situation. Many nations which Germany occupied during World War 2 or who collaborated with the Germans in the persecution of certain populations, espically Jews, have also held national trials in the years following World War 2 (War Crimes Trials). The goal of the post war trials was to punish all of the people charged with offenses recognized as crimes in Article 2 of the Control Council of Law no 10 (War Crimes Trials). Due to the heinousness of such crimes, it was vital of authorites to go to such extremes. These post war trials really helped bring peace to many of the victims of the crimes.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dehumanization of Jews

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the most historical acts of evil and cruelty was the genocide of Jews in Europe executed by the Nazi party lead by Hitler. It is estimated that six to nine million Jews were killed through the use of devices such as gas chambers. One must know why an act of such evil was ever convened, how the Jewish people reacted, and how terrible genocide seized to exist.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuremberg Trial Summary

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some historians believe that the same aggression and persistence that the Nazi’s showed the Jewish commmunity by sentencing death and imprisonment could be seen throughout the Nuremberg trials. difficult to pin anything significant on anyone present, which begs the quesion is this fair, are human right being effected. This week’s theme of consequentalism acan be seen throughout the Nurember Trials and the fact that Adolf Hitler would his followers aimed to promote the survival non-Jewish people who in the eyes of Nazi’s reigned supreme and with the removal of Jews, you could prevent, avoid and disregard any consequences because the Nazi party was supreme. The consequentialism ideology allows individuals to agree while disagreing about outcomes regardless of the consequence being good or bad. Adolf Hilter and the Nazi party may have felt that it was there duty and diligence to produce the greatest good for his people, the non jewish community. Ultiamelty, consequentailism seems to be an open ended model which moves depending on politcical and or military precendence and…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Nuremberg Laws were aimed at preserving the purity of the German race. One of the intentions of the Nuremberg Laws was to provide for who was considered to be a Jew or what it meant to be a Jew. This paper therefore examines the Nuremberg Laws, with an aim of answering the comparative question of what it meant to be a Jew according to the laws.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antisemitism In Germany

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mentch, Noelle. "Holocaust and The Second World War." Prezi.com. N.p., 10 Jan. 2016. Web. 20 Feb. 2017.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ferencz, B. (2005). The Holocaust and the Nuremberg Trials. UN Chronicle, 42(4), 26. Retrieved April 12, 2011, from < http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays