Preview

NSA Spy Agency Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1354 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
NSA Spy Agency Analysis
What if it was revealed that the President of the United States was intentionally violating the Constitution? The very Constitution which our founding fathers had written 200 years ago to protect our freedom. What if, instead of apologizing, the President justified this gross violation with the intent of protecting our nation by a super-secret spy agency? That frightening scenario came into fruition in 2002, when in light of the 9/11 attacks, President Bush signed a secret order authorizing the NSA to eavesdrop on citizens without their knowledge. On the 5th of June 2013, the world was forever changed. The Guardian had just published an article exposing a top secret court order requiring Verizon to hand over millions of customers’ phone records …show more content…
The NSA had initiated an unconstitutional mass surveillance of American’s communications, domestic and abroad. The most frightening fact is that the public never knew this was happening before the Edward Snowden leaks. In 2008, President Bush signed the FISA Amendment Act into law. This act greatly expanded the NSA’s authority to monitor electronic communications of American citizens. Proponents of the NSA argue that the NSA’s key objective is to maintain our national security, and monitoring communications can be a great tool to prevent acts of terrorism on our soil. Despite this, acts of terrorism such as the Boston Marathon bombing in 2013, could not be stopped. The perpetrators were both American citizens, and had lived in the States for a period of time. Why couldn’t the NSA, with billions of taxpayers’ dollars and its vast intelligence apparatus, prevent the loss of 3 lives and 264 injuries? …show more content…
In its persistent effort to collect and monitor all electronic communications, the NSA leads a campaign to undermine encryption, place backdoors in both hardware and software and amass a stockpile of vulnerabilities and exploits. “For the past decade, N.S.A. has led an aggressive, multipronged effort to break widely used Internet encryption technologies,” as stated in a memo from Government Communications Headquarters, the NSA’s counterpart agency in the UK (Nicole Perlroth). With support from the CIA and FBI, the NSA has also installed spy tools to monitor internet activity in network routers intercepted from US manufacturers like Cisco (Silbert). Furthermore, as a part of its data collection program, the NSA actively influences US and foreign IT industries to modify the design of their commercial products, making it more susceptible to exploitation. Such actions violate privacy rights of consumers, and in turn undermines confidence in the industry. The insertion of backdoors and vulnerabilities in systems are particularly troubling as such actions weakens cybersecurity as a whole, and could potentially backfire on us. The tools implemented by the NSA in its data collection program could one day be exploited by foreign

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This did nothing to stop the NSA, they continued to work in secret listening in without any restrictions or laws with the idea that it was to better the people. The Electronic Frontier foundation states that in 2005 the NSA was collecting data from major communications companies which violate the privacy safeguards put in by the U.S. congress and constitution. The EFF has been able to collect information through whistle blowers and in 2013 the media articles proving the reports of 2005 showing the government got everything that passed through all domestic fiber optic cables, the excuse once caught was under the Patriot act the government can collect any information they deem necessary for national security. Is it national security or national…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Pros And Cons

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page

    September 11 2001, marked a very tragic day in history, and immediate action was required in order to handle the situation. During the Bush administration, surveillance programs were put into place in order to monitor possible hostile actions towards our country. In a post Snowden article in 2006, Robert A. Levy went into depth about what Article II is and if current programs put into place can be deemed illegal. After reviewing Article II and Levy’s position I agree that it was illegal, but I believe that this was because what need to take place was described vaguely and was left up to interpretation. The fourth amendment speaks about using “reasonableness,” what might be reasonable to one may not mean the same to another. Due to this, abuse…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2001, people are quick to dismiss the idea of an internment of American citizens, suggesting that the country has come a long way from 1942. The hypothesis that the government might conduct surveillance or use illegal wiretaps to monitor groups or individuals that it suspects of domestic terrorism seemed foreign before September 11th, and now has become a way to gain more information about potential suspects. These new measures, included in the USA Patriot Act, delicately trace the line between national security and civil liberties. A brief look at how the Bush…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages

    On October 26th, 2001, just 45 days after September 11th a panicked Congress passed, with little debate, the USA Patriot Act. The 342 page patriot act violates our 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th amendments, thus making it unconstitutional. I don't know why Congress passed this act, or how it got through the Supreme Court, but most people in Congress didn't even read the Patriot Act. I am sure that our founding fathers would not have wanted the Patriot Act. Just look at what Ben Franklin said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."…

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Patriot was enacted so quickly, and with little oversight, a full review with the complete participation of Congress could allow for positive revisions. Without losing the major benefits, such as increased security and safety for our nations citizens, collective law enforcement cooperation and information sharing, and speeding up investigations by making legitimate use of surveillance easier to enact, taking another look at this incredibly powerful law is imperative. Allowing government authority to surpass that which the Constitution allows is completely contradictory to the founders intentions, and to the principles on which this nation was founded. As stated by Benjamin Franklin in his Pennsylvania Assembly Reply to the Governor, “those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” (Franklin, 1755). This is important to remember, as our nation becomes more accepting of tighter scrutiny in our private lives, all in the name of safety and security. Our world is changing, to be certain, though the extent in which we allow that change is solely in our hands, we, the people of the United…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutely, many people only focus on certain section of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The key word in conducting electronic surveillance is “illegal”. 1 For example, prior to and during the Edward Snowden case the person(s) directly involved assumed that the conduct of the NSA and CIA was unwarranted and illegal. If we examine some of the actions taken by NSA or CIA operatives involved, a task was given by higher command, which was completed. In some instances, the purpose of a task is not fully explained to the operative or the public. So, the question is did the operative comment something illegal? Was the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 violated? Not fully knowing of or seeing a FISA court order the actions…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the aftermath of September 11, Congress was eager to put laws on the books to prevent another attack. In an unprecedented spirit of bipartisan patriotism, a law was passed in the House by 357 to 66 (Clerk of the House) and in the Senate by 98 to 1 (Secretary of the Senate). The title of the act, USA PATRIOT Act, is an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. Since its historic passage there has been much debate on the constitutionality of the act. Some would claim the Legislative and Executive branches acted opportunistically and enacted a law that infringes on the rights of Americans. This paper, for sake of brevity, focuses on Section 213 of the Patriot Act, the “sneak and peak” section. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the arguments on both sides of the issues and determine whether or not Section 213 of the USA PATRIOT Act is indeed unconstitutional. This paper examines the history of the Patriot Act, evaluates recent litigation concerning this act, and considers precedents that would give or withhold from Congress the authority to enact such a law.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The information was gathered about this “hack” though Edward Snowden (Savage, et al 4). Snowden is a former NSA contractor, who has leaked over 200,000 documents to the press. Recently, Snowden is involved in the huge news story about the NSA hacking into Google and Yahoo and collecting data about millions of account users of these networks. He leaked stories to The Guardian and The Washington Post during his NSA career, because he knew something was happening that needed told to the public. They are supposed to protect our country by bringing in information to help take down potential or current terrorist threats, and, instead, the government is wasting money to have them spy on innocent citizens. So far there’s not even a good reason to it, because not every single person who owns a phone or computer is a threat. Some use these things to do homework and talk to people, without the worry of someone tracking their information and keeping it in data centers “just in case.” It’s all very…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    1984 and Privacy

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The National Security Agency, or NSA, is a top-secret agency believed to have the most advanced information vacuuming technology available, similar to the technology used to monitor people in 1984. "In the past, intercepting communications meant just that--copying a telegram mid-route, steaming open an envelope, or attaching alligator clips to the copper wires that connected every phone in the world."(Fordahl) These became extinct as we moved into the digital age; it is now easier than ever to access mass amounts of data. Many people fear that this is turning out to be a fast path to mass surveillance.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research laws and Acts

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the biggest violations to American Civil Rights is the Patriot Act. “The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act of the U.S. Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The act greatly reduced restrictions that were placed on law enforcement agencies and gave them the ability to search telephone, e-mail communications, medical, financial, and other records. It eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States and expanded the Secretary of the Treasury’s authority to regulate financial transactions. The Patriot Act expanded the definition of terrorism to include domestic terrorism, thus enlarging the number of activities to which the powers can be applied. Since its passage, several legal challenges have been brought against the act, and Federal courts have ruled that a number of provisions are unconstitutional. Opponents have criticized the sections that authorize the indefinite detentions of immigrants, searches through which law enforcement officers search a home or business without the owner’s or the occupant’s permission or knowledge, and the expanded use of National Security Letters, which allows the FBI to search telephone, e-mail, and financial records without a court order. The Patriot Act gave law enforcement agencies unprecedented access to business records, including library and financial records. Not all aspects of the Act have been challenged and many Americans have approved the passage. People have promoted the provisions made to the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires financial institutions in the United States to assist U.S. government agencies to detect and prevent money laundering. Title II of the Patriot Act established three very controversial provisions, “sneak and peek” warrants, roving wiretaps and the ability of the FBI to gain access to documents that reveal the patterns of U.S. citizens. The so-called “sneak and peek” law allowed for delayed notification of the execution of search…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    US Government Watching Us

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many steps that our computer engineer community can and should do to fix the problem. Exposing and bringing the culprits name that are spying on us to the light to notify innocent people that use their website or data for private usage. The engineers should come forward about the NSA and what they are doing to the internet. Also find out how they are subverting routers and switches, so we can design barriers that will block them from getting into our data. Doing these things will prevent the NSA to whole sale spy on us. There are open protocols, implementations, and systems that will hinder the NSA to subvert the web. The computer engineering task force needs to step up and demand our internet privacy back.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Patriot Act was designed to try and eliminate acts of terrorism on the United States. This act was signed in 2001 by president George W. Bush. Just weeks after the terrorist attacks on 9/11(NBCNews). The Patriot Act allows for the government to identify terrorist. “This is done by wiretapping and monitoring text messages and phone calls’’(Diamond).I am not saying that are civil liberty aren't important but when it comes to keeping our citizens safe then this is the only choice. People who have nothing to hid should have no problem with the government monitoring them for the sake of people's lives. The patriot act has allowed for at least 50 terrorist attacks against the United States to be foiled since 9/11.(Johnson) This Act is doing…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of the attacks on the date of 9/11, Congress passed the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act made the government’s ability to spy on individuals easier, but also weakened the checks and balances our country relies on. So in essence, the threat of terrorism against our country paved the way for violating one of our basic civil liberties under the fourth amendment of the constitution – the ability to live free of unreasonable searches and seizures. However, the ability for government agencies to obtain information quickly and without warning becomes a powerful tool against terrorism.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA Pros And Cons

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    September 11, 2001 was the deadliest day for New York. Thousands died because of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. Two planes crashed into the twin towers while a third crashed into the pentagon and a fourth into a field in Pennsylvania. Something this big could not have been decided that morning, it needed to be planned. All the people involved need to know what they were going to do. This meant they had to have some form of communication along the way, whether it was through calls or texts. Imagine if all of this could have been prevented. All those lives that were lost could have been saved. If only the NSA would have known. Even though it violates the privacy act of the constitution, it is better to be safe than sorry, potential terrorist attacks could be stopped, and it will not matter if you are not doing anything wrong.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Etzioni, A. (2004). How patriotic is the Patriot Act?: Freedom versus security in the age of…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays