My Thought’s on the Separation of Religion and Government

My Thought’s on the separation of Religion and Government.
I believe these United States, to be a country founded on religious beliefs. At the end of the Constitution, before the founding fathers signatures, it says “Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth. In Witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names.” I point out where it says “the year of our Lord”. Who are they speaking of? They king of England?
The Constitution of the United States of America
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Amendment 1
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Much like the Bible, I believe people read into the constitution. I believe they read it in away that it adapt to their life style or belief. The 1st Amendment of the Constitution says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”. How does this statement apply to a granite statue of the 10 commandments? There’s no law requiring anyone to stop and read it. How does this apply to a moment of silence in a school? There’s no requirement to pray, just be silent. Here a question I read on the internet. Did the Founding Fathers intend to assure the people freedom "of" religion or freedom "from" religion? My answer to this question is simple, those that read the Constitution reads “freedom of religion”. Those that read into the Constitution read freedom from religion. With the Bible people play with the words. They change the Bible and its meaning to fit their life style. The same applies to the Constitution. People change it to fit their life style. Instead of a life style based on religion, we have a society where our religion is based on our life style. Instead of a life style lived within the constraints of the constitution, we have a constitutions slowly changing to adapt to our life style. The 1st Amendment also says “Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of a religion”. Yet the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco has ruled the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional under the 1st Amendment due to its inclusion of the phrase "under God." I personally believe in God, therefore this phrase perfectly fine. In 1962, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Union Free School District No. 9 in Hyde Park, New York had violated the 1st Amendment by directing the Districts' principals to cause the following prayer to be said aloud by each class in the presence of a teacher at the beginning of each school day:
"Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our Country." This I agree is unconstitutional according to the 1st Amendment, by reasons of, not all students in the district are of one faith. Not everyone in the district believes in God and therefore should not be required to recite a prayer. However those that do believe should not be prohibited from doing so.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that public school districts may not allow students to lead pre-game prayers at high school football games.
Finding that the practice violates the constitutionally required separation of religion and government provided in the 1st Amendment, the Courts 6-3 decision was issued in the Texas case of Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the school's messages or invocations must be "nonsectarian and non-proselytizing" in nature and also confirmed that student-led religious prayers at football games violated the Constitution.
The In 1962, the Supreme Court outlawed organized, school-sponsored prayer in public schools and in 1992, struck down similar prayers at public school graduation ceremonies. My question to the Supreme Court is; is there a law that says I can not take the life of another? Is there a law that says I can not take what is not lawfully mine? Is there a law that says I must tell the truth? Is there a law that says I can not commit adultery? If there are such laws, then they too are in conflict with the 1st Amendment according to your way of thinking. Sixth Commandment: Thou shalt not kill. Seventh Commandment:. Thou shalt not commit adultery. eighth Commandment: Thou shalt not steal. Nineth Commandment Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. Remember the 1st Amendment of the Constitution says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”. These laws therefore are unconstitutional and should be stricken or removed. It’s how you see or interpret what you read. I read the Constitution as it is written “freedom of religion”; I don’t read into or misinterpret it to fit any perception I may have. It is as it is written.
By the removal of the church, we also remove the concept of moral value. Kid’s no longer see stealing and killing as morally wrong, they now see it as just being against the law. But they’re also taught in today society that it’s against the law to be caught breaking the law. If you’re never caught, then you broke no law. Their taught, some laws are mean to be broken, that laws only apply to the poor or those without power. What message are we sending our children? They no longer see de-respect of parents and grandparents as morally wrong. They only see what they determine as their rights. They right to hit, a parent or grandparent.