I enjoyed reading your post this week, too. I agree with your conclusion, especially “The District Court Judge in the Oiler vs. Winn Dixie case would have had to side with Oiler that he was unlawfully discriminated against and Winn Dixie would have most certainly had to pay Oiler for his monetary losses.” That is very important because both the court’s decision and Winnie-Dixie’s misconduct put Peter Oiler in a bad situation. But, Winnie-Dixie also had a bad reputation by firing Oiler. The company have understood later how they lost their good reputation. The LGBT law eased life for LGBTs.…
On January 17th, 2017 at 9:15 a.m, Case manager, Vanessa Banks, received information that Head of Household's, Juanita Moore, son, Darrin Moore, was arrested on January 16th, 2017 by HOH's daughter, Kelay Burke. CM inquired about the related charges and if Darrin was released. HOH's daughter reported that no one in the family knew the details, nor were they able to talk to him about the charges. She continued to state that Darrin's friend, who was arrested with him and released, stated that he had court on 1/17/17. CM attempted to look up Darrin in DC case search, but no record was found. CM will follow up with family on 1/18/17.…
Nataiya is a former foster child. She was living in the home with her mother (Marilyn). On the night of 2-29-16, Marilyn put Nataiya and the children out of the home. Nataiya was disrespecting Marilyn’s home by using drugs and brining in men. As of 2-29-16, Nataiya and the children became homeless. Nataiya went into the DHS office on 3-1-16, because she is homeless. Marilyn does not want Nataiya back in the home, but is willing to get the children. DHS is going to do a safety plan for the children to go with the grandmother until an assessment is done on the mother.…
The reporting party stated Cera and her son Jake AWOL'd from the facility and had not returned. Information was obtained from another resident, Bobbi Thomas who stated Cera and her friend Briella age 17 and her 1 month old child were gone the weekend as they were "going on the blade" referring to they were prostituting. Subsequently was reported both teen moms went their babies with other people/friends who were staying in the hotel room. It was unknown if the babies are in the same hotel or hotel room as the mothers while they are actively prostituting. Bobbie stated the mothers are reporting their babies are safe. According to the reporting party there are no restrictions on with whom the mother can leave their children. The reporting party has limited information and not sure the information obtained is accurate. The reporting has no idea where the mothers and babies could be. Additionally the reporting party has no information regarding the friends who are caring for the…
CCIB received a Child/Ren’s Emergency Response form RP Lauren Stain CBEN via email stating RP has concerns about the foster children (Daniel, Lleah and Rayna Babcock) in the home safety. RP stated on 5/2/2017, Jessica Tanihana Mother contacted RP to stated that her and biological son Joseph Tanihana (16) got into an altercation before going to a doctor’s appointment. RP reported Jessica stated that she told Joseph that they had to leave for the appointment and Joseph replied “that he did not want to go”. RP reported Jessica stated that Joseph began to hit her on the arm and then she started to hit him back. RP reported Jessica stated she got away from Joseph then contacted CBEN to state what happened. RP reported that Joseph gets triggered…
Michael Harrison Jr. the plaintiff filed a complaint with the EEOC against the defendant Killeen Fast- Food Restaurant (Wendy’s) for refusal to hire him based on his hearing impairment despite his qualifications. The EEOC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Waco Division, the general manager of the restaurant refused to hire…
Facts: Police officers were in pursuit of a suspected drug dealer, and were led to an apartment complex. The officers ended up outside of a certain apartment, were the smell of marijuana emanated. The police knocked loudly, and from inside the apartment they heard movement, and the police believed that the sounds were an indication that evidence was being destroyed. The police announced their intent to enter the apartment, kicked the door down to find drugs and drug paraphernalia in plain sight, and arrested King and others. They continued to search the apartment and came across other evidence. King argued that due to the officers not having a warrant…
Tinker v. Des Moines is a court case that happened in 1969 and was a dispute about wearing armbands to school for a protest against the Vietnam war. The principals did not like the idea of the protest and decided to shut it down by banning all armbands. The students weren't going to go down without a fight and wore them anyway.…
After a responding deputy identified them both, he arrested Foster on an outstanding warrant from Stark County. During the process, a glass jar containing suspected methamphetamine was found inside her…
Mrs. Cordell stated her understanding of why Max and Zoey where removed from the home is due to drug usage by Melissa and Anthony, the parents of the children. The assessor read Mrs. Cordell the facts of the affidavit as to why Max and Zoey were removed out of the care of Melissa and Anthony. Mrs. Cordell stated she recently moved to Temple after being informed of CPS involvement and stated she was not aware of any drugs usage until she saw her son Anthony. Mrs. Cordell stated she knew Anthony was using drugs after looking into his face. Mrs. Cordell stated she believes the allegations of drug usage for Melissa and Anthony.…
Summary of Key Facts A. Deborah Weisman graduated from Nathan Bishop Middle School, a public…
In the Texas vs Cobb case a man named Raymond Levi Cobb was first arrested in 1994 and confessed to a home burglary. In this process he denied that he killed the woman and child in the home but later confessed to his father which his father then went to report this to the police. Even though Cobb later waived his Miranda rights and confessed he was still indicted and sentenced to death. Cobb argued to the Texas Court of Appeals that after his confession he was denied his right to counsel because his request for an attorney wasn’t renewed after the burglary case. The Court later said that the right to counsel carries onto the reason charged if any other offenses are closely related to the case. It was then declared with a five to four vote under…
1) Whether the Gun Free School Zone Act of 1997 (18 USC 922 q) applies to DeNolf and whether it violates the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution…
A group of African-American youths were on a freight train through Alabama. They got into a fight with some white youths, throwing the white boys from the train. A message was sent, requesting all blacks be removed from the train. Two white girls on the train testified that they had been raped by six different youths in turn. The youths were taken into custody. The community was very hostile, as a mob met the youths. The trial judge appointed “all members of the bar” for the purpose of the arraignment. The defendants themselves were illiterate and “ignorant”. They were all tried separately, each trial lasting a day, convicted, and sentenced to death. Throughout the proceedings, none of the “Scottsboro” boys was allowed to contact their relatives, who lived out of State. On the day of the trial, an out-of-town attorney appeared for the defendants but announced that he could not formally represent them. The trial judge called on all the local lawyers present to assume responsibility for defending the nine young men, but only one agreed. The two lawyers had no opportunity to investigate the case or consult with their “clients.” All nine youths were found guilty by four separate juries, despite testimony from doctors who said they found no evidence of rape upon examining the women. Eight of the nine men received the death penalty. The convictions were appealed through the State courts of Alabama, and failing there, went to the Supreme Court.…
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibits voting discrimination. With the condition to receive preclearance stated in section 5 of the Act from the Department of Justice before making any changes affecting the voting process, also came four other prohibitions. The prohibition of literacy test or other similar test or devices as a prerequisite to voter registration is one prevention. The requirement of jurisdictions with significant language minority populations to provide non-English ballots and oral voting instructions is another. Third is the prohibition of vote dilution, which is the remapping of districts to suppress the minority vote. The final provision was one of the most controversial of the Act. It established the federal oversight over the administrations of elections in areas where racism and discrimination thrived. This provision of the VRA was one of the most controversial because some citizens believed it was a major intrusion of States rights.…