Preview

Motivation In Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
944 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Motivation In Julius Caesar
Shakespeare's play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" is one that transcends time from the Roman times to the Elizabethan times and to the present. "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" has characters which display similar mindsets of those in Elizabethan times and today. Many of the characters in the play have a certain motivation to complete a long-term or short term goal. These motives arise from things like a strive for perfection, ambition and greed among people who are subservient. Each character in Julius Caesar has his own motivation whether it is the soothsayer who wanted to warn Caesar or Cassius who wanted to kill him. The nature of human beings was clearly represented as characters in the play had different motives but ended up wanting to …show more content…
Mark Antony was a Roman citizen, who was good friends with Julius Caesar. When the conspirators killed Julius Caesar, Mark Antony was very angry. Though he pretended to be their friend, he truly revolted against the conspirators by becoming motivated. By being provoked, he had also motivated the crowd to rebel against the conspirators. Mark Antony had many causes for rebelling against the conspirators who assassinated Julius Caesar. These motivations led to a battle between Mark Antony, Octavius Caesar, Brutus, and Cassius. His main motivation was vengeance. One last drive for spurring up the crowd to attack the conspirators was that he was extremely loyal to his friend, Julius Caesar. He cared and loved Julius Caesar. He called him one of the noblest mans that ever lived. Shakespeare created this character using drives that sparked from the murdering of Julius Caesar. He makes an understanding that revenge can be a type of motivation that causes things to happen because of events that have happened in the past. This human characteristic is natural and appears commonly in our world. Shakespeare also probably tried to show that revenge could drive oneself into a more deathly path than a safe one. By utilizing motivations, which satisfy one's need, Shakespeare was able to grasp the reader or
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar's Funeral Rhetorical Analysis
    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar's Funeral Rhetorical Analysis

    In the eulogy at Caesar’s funeral, Marc Antony, close friend of Caesar and general, seems to claim that he believes that Marcus Brutus and the rest of the men involved with the death of Caesar are honorable men, but in actuality believes that Caesar was the only honorable man in the Senate who was always there for his country and brought prosperity to his country. He also claims to not want to get revenge on the murderers of Caesar, but in reality, the whole point of his speech was to turn the citizens of Rome against Brutus so that Caesar’s death will be avenged. He develops this claim by first creating ethos and pathos refuting Brutus’ excuse that Caesar was ambitious. Then, he emphasizes the grand betrayal of Brutus towards Caesar. Towards…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Effects of Caesar's Rise to Power
    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Effects of Caesar's Rise to Power

    The Roman's godlike worship of Caesar threatens the prominence of the Senate. To retain his dominance Mark Antony chooses to become a close ally to him. Cassius, Brutus, and the other conspirators however, plot Caesar’s demise. In the end, Mark Antony finds high esteem and the conspirators receive banishment and death. The play is an example, or maybe even a warning, that our actions and reactions have real effects. Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, and Cimber respond swiftly and without thought to Caesar’s rise and pay a heavy price for it in the end. Mark Antony sees the worth in being Caesar’s friend, and their friendship benefits him when Caesar is dead. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the principal characters' initial reactions to Caesar’s rise affect their conclusive outcomes.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast Julius Ceasar essay
    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare and contrast Julius Ceasar essay

    First off, Antony was a genius in how he presented his speech to the populous with how he sparked so many different emotions in them. In the beginning of his speech Antony sparks impatience in the Roman people by making them want to hear what Caesar has left them in his will. And when he finally tells them what he included in it, he made them feel melancholy towards their deceased leader who was described by Antony as a noble and respectable man who cared only for the people and the country that he was about to rule over. But very quickly after that, the audience of Antony’s became enraged towards the men who had called themselves his friends and killed Caesar. They wanted to murder them all and avenge their beloved leader. Antony told them not to be angry, but he clearly did this on purpose because he too wanted to avenge Caesar’s death. He very skillfully manipulated these people’s feelings and made them vengeful as he wanted them to be.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In What Ways Does the Language and Imagery of Antony’s Speech Demonstrate His Manipulation of the Crowd?
    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In What Ways Does the Language and Imagery of Antony’s Speech Demonstrate His Manipulation of the Crowd?

    In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Mark Antony’s speech at Caesar’s funeral, despite all his protestations to the contrary, is fuelled by one purpose: vengeance to those who murdered his beloved Caesar. He uses combinations of verbal irony, repetitive diction, and heavy emphasis on emotions to sway his audience. He does so without guilt or remorse towards the people to whom the crowd will direct their wrath. Not only does he think of nothing but revenge, he convinces the crowd that he wants no harm to come to Caesar’s murderers.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar: The Effects Of Ambitious Leaders
    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar: The Effects Of Ambitious Leaders

    In both Animal Farm by George Orwell and The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, having an ambitious leader leads to many consequences. The word ambition means to have or show a strong desire and determination to succeed. Leaders such as Julius Caesar, Marc Antony, and Napoleon have ambition that makes them seem prepared for anything. This makes the people and animals follow them blindly believing they are helping the cause but in reality, they’re only helping their leader. Being ambitious can be both helpful and harmful but the consequences can be fatal.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives
    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives

    Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar clearly presents conflicting perspectives of the assassination of Caesar, a powerful and respected leader, viewed by the conspirators as overly ambitious, but by Marc Antony as a loyal servant of Rome. Brutus and the conspirators believe that Caesar’s death is necessary in retaining democracy, whereas Antony regards the act as brutal murder.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Of Ambition And Julius Caesar
    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparison Of Ambition And Julius Caesar

    Adolf Hitler and Julius Caesar were both powerful men that were ambitious. Hitler created the third Reich in Germany. Hitler also had this idea of a perfect race. He killed many Jews without blonde hair and blue eyes. Caesar was the dictator of Roman Empire, and he never lost a war while he was in command. He played a critical role in forming the Roman Empire.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jealousy In Julius Caesar
    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jealousy In Julius Caesar

    The character Cassius in the tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare constantly reflects palpable jealousy. In Act I Scene II, Cassius claims “I was born free as Caesar; so were you:/We both have fed as well, and we both/Endure the winter’s cold as well as he…”(Shakespeare, lines 5-7); and feels king Caesar does not deserve superiority over him. In this scene, Cassius is pointing out to Brutus that he and Cassius deserve the power to lead Rome more than Caesar. In order to prove these points, Cassius shares three stories with Brutus in his speech: one of when he and Caesar had a swimming contest; another when he saw Caesar sickly and frail after a fever; and lastly one where Caesar again is portrayed as a weak and sickly man. In the monologue by Cassius directed at Brutus, Cassius uses paradox, self-heroic word choice and similes throughout three separate stories to give examples of Caesar’s weaknesses. Cassius’ main goal becomes to portray Caesar as any other man; and to rationalize killing the king to gain power for (what he…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Conflicting Perspectives Julius Caesar
    • 2407 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Conflicting Perspectives Julius Caesar

    In Shakespeare’s drama, bias and self-interest, more than anything else, are the key elements of the conflicting perspectives fabricated in the play. Shakepeare unites the epic legedary stories of nationalism in the history of Julius Caesar to the lyrical stage craft of the theatre. The drama provides a visual realism of the fortitude of men; it highlights the self-acting individual and their ability to supersede values of patriotism and nationalism when self-interest becomes apparent. A key example of this is the character Brutus. The characterisation of Brutus changes throughout the play. So the audience is left with the conflicting perspective of who Brutus is; they are only left with the representation of who he is, only to work out for themselves who the true Brutus is. At the beginning of the play, the audience is shown a character who is noble, good, patriotic, honourable but most of all, proud of Rome. He is also depicted to be loyal. “Brutus has rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” This quote from Act 1 scence 2, shows the inital view of Brutus at the start of the play; it portrays him as noble and loyal to Rome. This becomes a motif throughout the play…

    • 2407 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mark Antony's Ethos In Julius Caesar
    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mark Antony's Ethos In Julius Caesar

    Mark Antony appeals to the crowd's sense of ethos to establish himself in their eyes as a noble man, and to surreptitiously separate the conspirators' from their lofty reputations. Specifically, Antony mentions that he has the power to "do Brutus wrong and Cassius wrong, who, you know, are honourable men", but he "will not do them wrong: [he] rather choose[s] to wrong the dead, to wrong [himself] and [the people], than [he] will wrong such honourable men" (). Antony says that though he could, it wouldn’t be right to speak against the conspirators, and he would rather take the blow of Caesar's death himself. The repetition of the words "wrong" and "honourable" places emphasis on the killers' reputation, and sheds light on how Antony has respect…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Julius Caesar Too Ambitious
    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    Why Is Julius Caesar Too Ambitious

    People of Rome, the future of our country has been endangered by the once admired Caesar. He had become too ambitious and was abusing his power. What I and my neighbors did was to protect Rome from his danger. He was killed to protect you. Over the last few years Caesar had become too ambitious and started abusing his power.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Essay
    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar Essay

    During the initial scenes of his play, Shakespeare clearly outlines the distinct conflict of perspectives held by his main protagonists; Antony and Cassius regarding Caesar. Shakespeare’s representation of Antony incorporates that of a humble, loyal and devoted disciple of Caesar; embodied in his vow “When Caesar says, ‘Do this’, it is performed.” Antony’s obedient tone, linked with the concise manner in which he replies to Caesar, captures the utter willingness to serve “Caesar, (his) lord.” In contrast, Shakespeare exhibits Cassius’ bitterness and envy of Caesar as he influences Brutus’ inner confusion to the viewpoint he considers correct. Cassius provides an analogy further encouraging the traitorous desires; “he doth bestride the narrow world like a colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs.” Here Cassius employs a sarcastic tone to aggressively attack Caesar’s authority as a leader, “such a feeble temper should so get the start of…

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Brutus Caesar Honorable
    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is Brutus Caesar Honorable

    Shakespeare parallels Caesar and Brutus. He repeats that Brutus says that “Caesar was ambitious” (6), and that “Brutus is an honorable man” (10). By constantly comparing the two characters, Mark Antony is making the audience think about the two men together. He wants them to realize that he truly means the opposite, and that Brutus is not an honorable man, because an honorable man would not say such things about Caesar. Antony wants the audience to revolt against Brutus, rather than agree to the idea that Caesar was ambitious and needed to die.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar: Conflicting Perspectives
    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar: Conflicting Perspectives

    Due to the complex nature of perspective, it is impossible to encapsulate the entire truth at once. Caesar perceives his role in public to be the “northern star” of Rome. Juxtaposed against this highhanded nature is the irony that Caesar has not fathered a child “Shake off their sterile curse,” showing a private frailty. Brutus emotively declares, “I love him well”, however his compassion is juxtaposed with the malicious metaphor “to put a sting in him” suggesting a wickedness in him. Both men however, are shown to have an overinflated sense of duty especially evidenced through the intra-conflict Brutus faces as “he is with himself at war” with the idea of murdering his long serving ally. Brutus reveals that individual’s perspectives of situations are manipulated by their own personal ideals through his justification “not that I loved Caesar less but that I loved Rome more”. Shakespeare manipulates the intrinsic virtue of duty into a vice that inspires arrogance in Caesar and malice in Brutus, clouding their judgement with personal bias.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Loyalty in Julius caesar
    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Loyalty in Julius caesar

    minds as they would a five year old. The mob, like a great many people,…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics