Preview

Most Dangerous Game Symbolism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
478 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Most Dangerous Game Symbolism
Richard Connell author of the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” did an exquisite job of defining mystery, but his story made the statement that there are some people in the world that don't care about animals or their feelings. This is shown in these four statements. First, Rainsford was talking to his friend on the side of a hunting yacht in pitch black saying that no one cares about the Jaguar this may suggest that he is a hardcore, Hunter. Not many people do it now, but there was one point in time where hunting was done in excessive amounts and most killed for sport , not for food. The second is when General Zaroff is showing Rainsford his vast collection of animal heads in his great hall before dinner and saying that he is hunted every kind of species that there is, except one, man, which in his opinion is the most dangerous game.In the story, General Zaroff has grown tired of hunting …show more content…
Humans in order to hunt and kill them must learn the jungle or other terrain in which the animals live. Zaroff and rainsford shared different views on hunting, Gen. zerof at one time enjoyed hunting beasts but after becoming an expert at animals the sport did not please him as much as it did, so he began to hunt human pray which has a greater intellect than an animal. On the other hand ainsford, after becoming very good at hunting has not lost the enjoyment, and when he hears that General zaroff hunts man and would like to have a “hunt” with him he begins to get nervous. General zaroff thinks that there is nothing wrong hunting man and even says that “I am not a murder but a hunter”. That one line is very unsettling because anyone in there right mind would know if not at least feel that it is wrong to kill other human beings. It is very unsettling how gen zerof asks rainsford if he may hunt him as if he was commenting about the whether and how it was going to be a nice day and if he would like a nice cup of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Most Dangerous Game

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is composed of character, setting and conflict. One of the critical themes in the short story is irony, which plays a major role in the story. There is irony in the setting, a remote jungle island, the conflict, murder verses hunting, and the characters, General Zaroff who is a crazed man-hunter and Mr. Rainsford, his prey.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game,” Sanger Rainsford is hard hearted and does not care about the animals that he pursues; however, when Rainsford is being hunted he realizes the fear of the prey, and his perspective shifts, therefore, he gains empathy for the quarry.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is a story about a hunter, Rainsford, who finds a deserted island, where he meets General Zaroff who too shares an interest in hunting. On this island, General Zaroff hunts humans that have had the misfortune to end up on his island. Although Zaroff lives in a very civilized home with electricity and fancy food, Zaroff himself is a very uncivilized being. In the story, General Zaroff is explaining to Rainsford why he hunts humans. “...If I wish to hunt, why should I not? I hunt the scum of the earth...a thoroughbred horse or hound is worth more than the score of them.” (Connell, 64). Zaroff is saying that it is okay to hunt people if you are better than them. He does not value human life. This makes…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two men don’t feel bad for hunting and taking their prey’s life. As shown when Rainsford remarks, “Who cares how a Jaguar feels, (1)”. Also, how General Zaroff who has already taken many animals lives, then proclaims, “I had to invent a new animal to hunt,” (8). Both examples show how both Rainsford and Zaroff show no empathy for murdering the animals as well as the humans. Therefore, Zaroff and Rainsford alike in the way they hunt. Another way Zaroff and Rainsford are alike is their belief that the world is divided into two classes. Zaroff’s theory being the world is divided by strong/weak. Zaroff states his opinion, “Life is for the strong...The weak were put here to give the strong pleasure,” (9). As for Rainsford’s perspective, he believes, “The world is made up of two classes, the hunted/huntee.” Both men believe that in the world, you're either one or the other. Furthermore, both men show identical qualities after Rainsford kills Zaroff when he sleeps in his bed, “He had never slept in a better bed.” (16). This shows that Rainsford now believes he has the power that Zaroff once had and accepts that he is now like Zaroff. In addition, they both are alike because when…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford will not take over General Zaroff’s game of hunting other humans. For instance, when General Zaroff asks Rainsford to go hunting, he says, “Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer.”(25) Rainsford classifies himself as someone who hunts animals, but not humans. He disapproves of General Zaroff’s game and most likely still does. In addition, while Rainsford is being hunted, he thinks, “The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.”(31) Rainsford is truly afraid at this point just like other humans are when they are being hunted. He has had the horrifying experience and probably doesn’t want anyone to feel this fear. As a result, Rainsford is a gentleman and animal…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Theme of the work is the conflict between hunter against hunted and is shown through the competitive nature of Rainsford and Zaroff’s confrontation. Zaroff holding back the truth of hunting humans and exerting his own power over Rainsford making the hunter prey in Zaroff’s…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford’s opinion on hunting is evident in the beginning of the story when Whitney and Rainsford are talking and they say “‘ Great sport, hunting.’ ‘The best sport in the world.’ Agreed Rainsford.”(p.1,…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainsford is still totally thrilled by the hunt. He has had so much experience in hunting that his experiences have led him to write a book on hunting. Rainsford is willing to spend time, and apparently large sums of money, to pursue his game. Rainsford sees himself as the strong, and he sees the animal as weak, non-intelligent target of his hobby. Zaroff, though he considers himself strong, sees hunting not just as a hobby, but as a way of life. The General depends heavily…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who is hunted in the story? “Here in my preserve on this island,” he said in the same slow tone, “I hunt more dangerous game.”(Connell, Pg 223) What does Rainsford mean by hunts more dangerous game? He may hunt tigers or even gorillas or elephants. But he…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff are distinct characters who share a passion for hunting big-game, but disagree on the value of human life. This disagreement leads Rainsford to kill Zaroff and end…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    General Zaroff Morals

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page

    In this story, General Zaroff doesn't realize that what he is doing is wrong. What he is doing is killing people, and he seems to think it is the same as hunting normal animals. He got “bored” of normal animals, because they couldn't reason with him. Humans give him a more exciting hunting experience, according to him. Zaroff doesn’t understand that it is wrong to kill humans, and he shows this misunderstanding when he says “There is one [animal] that can [reason]” and Rainsford says back “But you can’t mean… I can’t believe you are serious”, To this Zaroff replies: “Why should I not be serious? I am speaking of hunting... I had to invent a new animal to hunt...I found one... it supplies me with the most exciting hunting... the value of human…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Only when in the place of the prey does he understand the fear and terror felt when pursued by the reaper. Compounding the mania experienced by Rainsford is the fact that he cannot plead ignorance. He has been the predator countless times, pursuing his living quarry with religious zeal, and he knows how this encounter ends all too often. The antagonist, General Zaroff, has grown bored of traditional hunts and sought out “the only animal with reason” (Connell). Killing men for entertainment, or “sport”, may seem barbaric to most civilized people. But many other deaths occur daily from trivial pursuits from the running of the bulls in Pamplona to the ski slopes in the Alps. Furthermore, if the General seems desensitized to the destruction of human life, this doubtless stems from his service as a Cossack officer, where killing men was compulsory and undoubtedly an adrenaline-fueled adventure. The “legitimate” killing in war very well may have given him the taste for his “barbaric” hunts. To hunt is to kill with the intention of sport. This fictionalized anecdote illustrates that the killing in itself is neither good nor bad, but judged so by the killer. When General Zaroff was hunting enemies of the Russian state in the Caucus Mountains, were those kills more honorable than his forays into his private “game reserve”? Would the General’s killings be more legitimate if he declared himself the monarch of his small island, and wrote out an ultimatum against all who washed up on his shores? Upon closer examination line used to distinguish killings…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rainsford Argument

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page

    As a result, He now understands how the animals feel now that he has been hunted. Rainsford is arguing with the general that animals cannot reason. ”[He] [says] no animal[s] can reason”Complain Rainsford” (Connell 27). Know that he knows how the animals feel he thinks that no animal can reason to his disagreement. General Zaroff has now found Rainsford. ”Rainsford heard his breath the general's [attention] had went up to the tree”But the [edge] eyes of the hunter [had] stopped before they [could] reach the limb where Rainsford [had] lay[ed]; a [grin] [began] [to] spread over his brown face” (Connell 33). Now that rainsford understands how the animals feel when General Zaroff found him every muscle in his body had tensed. Rainsford has…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most Dangerous Game

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are three types conflicts, man versus nature, man versus himself, and man versus man in Richard Connell’s short story, “The Most Dangerous Game.” Hunters hunt all kinds of animals. However, in Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game” there is an exception for General Zaroff, he hunts humans! From when Rainsford arrives at Ship-Trap Island “All he knew was that he was safe from his enemy, the sea” (3). As he pushes himself forward “‘I must keep my nerve. I must keep my nerve’” (11). To when Rainsford steps into the general’s pitty little game, “He leaped up from his place of concealment. Then he cowered back. Three feet from the pit a man was standing, with an electric torch in his hand” (13). Rainsford then experiences…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Most Dangerous Game

    • 823 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One way that General Zaroff is mentally unstable is because he is a murderer. When Rainsford and General Zaroff are talking about hunting, General Zaroff mentions that there is only one animal that can reason with him and that is why they are the most dangerous, Rainsford finally gets that he means he is a murderer. When he asks what he means though, General Zaroff explains, “‘It’s and game you see’, pursued the general blandly, ‘I suggest to one of them that we go hunting. I give him a supply of food and an excellent hunting knife. I give him a three hours’ head start. I am to follow, armed only with a pistol of the smallest caliber and range. If my quarry eludes me for three whole days, he wins the game. If I find him’ -the general smiled- ‘he loses’” (66). By this, General Zaroff means that he kills the man. Then, Rainsford asks what happens if the man refuses to be hunted. General Zaroff then explains that the man has a choice between getting whipped by Ivan, his servant, or the hunt and they usually choose the hunt. While General Zaroff is explaining that, he also explains that he has not lost yet. Another way that General Zaroff is proven a murderer is…

    • 823 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays