Preview

A Question on Agricultural Ethics: Monsanto Case Study

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
987 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Question on Agricultural Ethics: Monsanto Case Study
Monsato Company –
A Question in Agricultural Ethics
PHL 323

A Brief History Monsato Company is a Missouri-based company founded in 1901 by John F. Queeny and his wife Olga Monsato producing saccharine. In the mid-1940s, Monsato Co. began developing agricultural chemicals and throughout the 1960s and 1970s, herbicides were developed and introduced to the farmers. In 1981, a research group was established and the business’s primary focus was molecular biotechnology. In 1982, Monsato Co. bought Jacob Hartz Seed Co., a company known in the Midwest for its soybeen seeds. Also in 1982, scientists working for Monsato Co. produced the first genetically modified plant. In 1996, RoundUp Ready Soybeans were introduced possessing an in-seed herbicide. Several other in-seed herbicides are introduced in 1997 by Monsato Co. such as RoundUp Ready Cotton and RoundUp Ready Canola. Also introduced is an in-seed insect protection called YieldGard Corn Borer. In 1998, Monsato Co. combines the technology of in-seed herbicides with their in-seed insecticides into one product for its corn seed. In 2002, Monsato Co. identifies corn hybrids, which yield more ethanol per bushel than normal corn. Later this same year, they also identify a similar hybrid in their soybeans, which will produce more oil than a normal soybean. In 2004, Monsato Co. creates American Seeds, Inc (ASI) to support regional seed business with capital, genetics, and technology investments. In 2005, Monsato Co. acquires four companies Fontanelle Hybrids, based in Fontanelle, Neb, Stewart Seeds, based in Greensburg, Ind., Trelay Seeds, based in Livingston, Wis., and Stone Seeds, based in Pleasant Plains, Ill. In 2006, they acquire several other local seed companies, some family-owned, including Diener Seeds, Sieben Hybrids, Kruger Seed Company, Trisler Seed Farms, Gold Country Seed, Inc., Heritage Seeds and Campbell Seed. Over the next several years, they also



References: 1) Monsato. (2010). Monsato. Retrieved from http://www.monsanto.com 2) Pearson, C. (2010, March). The Most Unethical Company is also Best Corporate Citizen. Cause Integration http://www.causeintegration.com/2010/ the-most-unethical-companyis-a-best-corporate-citizen-what-gives/ 3) Hirshberg, G. (2011, January). Speaking with One Voice to Stop Monsato and Biotech. Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-hirshberg/speaking-with-one-voice-t_b_816447.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I believe it’s safe to say Monsanto has not adhered to any basic moral standard when it comes to the safety of their products and the people consuming them. Since its inception in 1901, the company has had a penchant for substituting real food for artificial substitutes, which were often cheaper to manufacture. Their degradation of human society didn’t stop there, of course. By the 1920s, Monsanto was partnering with other large chemical companies around the world, producing industrial chemicals like PCBs, a chlorine compound used as a coolant. Unfortunately, there is a substantial health risk to handling PCBs, not to mention the damage it has already caused to the environment. Many major countries have had what we would consider pretty significant…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a producer of genetically modified seeds that lead to larger crop yields and eventually larger profits for farmers, Monsanto has a moral obligation to farmers who have grown crops and saved seeds for the next crop for hundreds of years before Monsanto began changing the genetic makeup of the seed. Farmers should not feel obligated to Monsanto as they have manipulated the future of farming through patent protection of intellectual property. Some thoughts should be discussed regarding Monsanto’s position; the comparison of seed manipulation as a form of technology, the use of patent protection, and the bullying of farmers through investigations of farmers reusing seeds from a previous harvest.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Monsanto

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    More than fifty countries all over the world are outraged over the multi-billion dollar biotechnology company Monsanto, and their attempt to control the world food supplies. It has been proven in various cases that their products could cause deadly defects, disorders, and are constantly harming the environment. They are eliminating small organic farm owners by accusing them of “stealing” their products and driving them out of business. On top of that, they are robbing the consumer’s right by refusing to label their products.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monsanto Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The most infamous GMO based company is Monsanto. For those who haven’t seen Food Inc. Monsanto is a company that specializes in GMOs and their applications and the patents that insure lots of money. Monsanto forces farmers into their agreements of use and if they should deny and end up using Monsanto’s patented seeds they find themselves with an excessive lawsuit so unreasonable it is impossible for the farmers to have any other option but agree to their terms. Yves Bertheau and John Davison wrote a case study called Genetically Modified and non-Genetically Modified Food Supply Chains examines the interaction between these seeds, “the simulation model presented...permits an analysis of mechanisms for detecting adventitious transfer of GM material…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Monsanto Harvest with Fear

    • 5210 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Monsanto positions itself as a relatively new agricultural company having formed in 2002, and focused on supporting local farmers around the world. They also promote themselves as a guardian of the environment with a mission “to produce more food while conserving more” (Monsanto.com). Today’s Monsanto conglomerate also promotes itself as the “New Merchants,” a leading research company in the field of agriculture-crop production, as well as a strong supporter of public and private research through its grant, donations and University scholarship programs.…

    • 5210 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company Profile: Monsanto is an Agricultural company which delivers agricultural products. It was founded in 1901. It’s also listed as one of the fortune 500 companies’ headquartered in Missouri, United States of America. They are present in 60 plus countries with an overall 30 thousand employees.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being a multinational supplier of genetically modified seeds, Monsanto posses severe economic impacts in the international marketplace. Originally, the Bt Cotton seeds should have produced positive externalities upon the Indian economy, however, the enforcement of the biological patent disables the economy from reaching the potential positive effects. Initially, the purpose of the genetically modified cotton seeds were to substantially increase the production of cotton. Higher crop yields would have resulted in cheaper prices for consumerism, as economies of scale would have taken effect. However, as the revenue generated by farmers cannot cover variable costs, a shut down point will be reached within the industry. Farming revenue is irregular…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While there are questions of Monsanto’s ethical practices, the success of producing genetically modified seeds is irrefutable. While GM seeds are profitable, the disputes that these seeds have the potential to harm plants and animals are ongoing. As previously stated Monsanto’s seeds are resistant to its own herbicide, Roundup. With this in mind, the seed’s composition includes the chemical glyphosate, an ingredient of Roundup. According to Scientific American (2009), glyphosate “amplifies the toxic effect on human cells—even at concentrations more much diluted than those used on farms and lawns”, and that other ingredients in Roundup may negatively impact pregnant women and their fetuses(Gammon). On the other hand, Monsanto contest the findings,…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fast Foods Film Analysis

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Clarence Thomas was a Monsanto lawyer from 1976-1979, then he became a Supreme Court justice and allowed Monsanto to patent the soybean seed. In 1996, Monsanto began selling Roundup ready soybeans. In 1996 about 2% of soybeans in the US where from Monsanto, by 2008 90% of soybeans in the US where Monsanto’s seeds. Monsanto owns these seed which means a farmer cannot clean the seeds to reuse them the next year. The company employs about 75 people to watch farmers to make sure they don’t reuse the seeds. Most farmers who would not be shown on camera likened them to ex-military or ex-police who would follow and intimidate the farmers. One famer interviewed, David does not use Monsanto seeds. He employs Moe Parr, one of the last seed cleaners in Indiana, to clean his own seeds. He still has to be careful what seeds he cleans because his neighboring fields have GMO’s planted and if the wind blows a seed to his field he is still responsible. Monsanto has a black list of people not to sell beans to and both Moe and David are on there. David asked Moe what he is supposed to do after he can’t clean his seeds anymore and can’t buy Monsanto seeds, Moe has no idea. When this film was made the Clinton administration was in office and Monsanto executive served in the administration.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What would you do if you knew a company you loved and adored, had horrible and atrocious ethics? Many people don’t realize how many businesses practice poor ethics and get away with unethical behavior. One of the most unethical businesses in the world is Monsanto. Most people would agree that Monsanto has been through hell and back because of their Ethics.…

    • 106 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The company that I researched for unethical practices is Tyco International; the nature of the controversy was the fraud and scandals that Tyco international has gone through. In 1999 the SEC began to analyze Tyco’s accounting practices do to the company was standing in 28 million dollars in debt. They were able to pinpoint many areas that were not adding up with the amounts money was being taken and there was really no good explanation. They found out that the CEO at that time Dennis Kozlowski and the CFO Mark Swartz failed to disclose millions of dollars of low interest and interest free loans from Tyco. The company was so far in debt they almost had to file bankruptcy, the unethical behavior from the CEO and the CFO resulted in the shareholders lost millions of dollars because their shares went from $60 dollars down to $15 dollars. It is said that between the both of them they stole over $170 million dollars from the company.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Monsanto Case Study

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Question 1: Will the advertising campaign that is proposed at the end of the case study be effective in penetrating the European Market?…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Gmo Foods

    • 5714 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Biotech food corporations have patented a number of genetically altered food and pharmaceutical crops that can only be grown with a proper license and new seeds must be purchased each year. Regrettably genetically engineered crops cannot be contained. Over the years Monsanto has sued hundreds of farmers for patent infringements and many of these farmers have been driven into bankruptcy and have lost everything. Farmer Percy Schmeiser refused to give in, Schmeiser had been in the farming business and developing his own seeds for fifty years, then had his fields carelessly contaminated by Monsanto, when this happened the company tried to take his land and his livelihood. Schmeiser stated, “I never put those plants on my land. The question is where do Monsanto’s rights end and mine begin?” The case went before the Federal Court of Canada, where Schmeiser accused Monsanto of trespassing, improperly obtaining samples of his seed from a local seed plant, and contamination of his crops with unwanted GM plants. In 2008 Monsanto settled out of court, agreed to pay all clean-up costs and agreed that Monsanto may be sued for recontamination if it happens again, also that Schmeiser would not be under a gag order which had been the norm. In this case, Monsanto’s patent was deemed valid; however Schmeiser was not forced to pay for the ‘privilege’ of the contamination. Even more recently Riceland Foods one of the largest rice cooperative in the U.S. won their lawsuit against Bayer when its natural long grain rice was contaminated with Bayer’s unapproved genetically engineered rice. Bayer was also ordered to pay a dozen farmers nearly $50 million for contaminating the commercial market that damaged rice prices back on 2006. (Dr. Mercola, 2012) These companies are trying to convince us these are safe reliable methods of feeding billions and making us healthier, and that they are benefiting us in the long run and if that’s true then they should have these patents, but are they?…

    • 5714 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    God gave man dominion over the land and the animals so that he could take care of them and prosper with them Genesis 1:24-31. Since the human race was created in God's image, humans should exercise that dominion with wisdom and mercy like God does upon man. Yet man has perverted this duty by taking too much from the land and animals, and not fulfilling the original contract to take care of them. This has become evident in factory farming because man is mistreating the animals in order to produce the cheapest and most productive system for vast amounts of meat no matter the moral standing to animals and the land. This has to be changed to keep the contract intact, which Peter Singer and Jim Mason are trying to do in The Ethics of Eating Meat. They are trying to convert as many people as possible to vegetarianism and veganism to stop factory farming and what it is doing to the world as it is known. Yet one must argue if that is ever possible, so a better solution must be sought for all the omnivores, vegetarians, and vegans out there may have an alternative that best suits everyone's wishes and the best interests of the contract.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Monsanto Seed

    • 3536 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Monsanto Company is a global supplier of agricultural products that had sales in excess of $6.3 billion in 2005 (c-548). It sold genetically modified (GM) canola seeds in Canada and GM soybean seeds in the United States. The company developed a patented process in Canada that “covered the gene and process for insertion…and cells derived from that process,” and in the United States covered the entire plant. By using this patented process, seeds had an increased resistance to glyphosate (many generic herbicides contained this) and would survive being sprayed. This was the stated object of the patented invention. These plants were known as Roundup Ready.…

    • 3536 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays