Preview

Modern Management

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Modern Management
Assignment 1.2: Modern Management
Lee Dale Foley
Jones International University
August 16, 2011

Abstract

Today, individuals are sometimes naïve to believe that modern management is a result of recent practices, theories, and ideas. Some believe the general structure of management and how human resources are carefully planned is the direct result of today’s contributors. They are erroneous to believe such. This commentary will explore the histories of management while cultivating the reader concerning the development of modern management and supervision as it is the result of the evolution of management that began in the nineteenth century involving slavery, railroads, and legal issues.

Assignment 1.2 – Development of Modern Management
Modern management has a distinctive composition consisting of managers, administrative practices, personnel, and capital. Many individuals are naïve in their perception of today’s management believing it is a direct result of recent practices, theories, and concepts; however, historians argue differently. Historians have taken readers on a journey through the history of management, while educating people concerning the management of slaves, railroads, and legal issues – the pillars of modern-day management.
Slavery
“American slavery has been wrongfully excluded from histories of management. By 1860, when the historical orthodoxy has modern management emerging on the railroads, 38,000 managers were managing the 4 million slaves working in the US economy.” (Cooke, 2003) Slave trade greatly influenced the management era. Slaves were responsible for farming, construction, irrigation, housekeeping, child-care, cooking, and much more. This surplus of human resources and capital required managers which eventually led divisions of management. Slave owners hired managers to supervise the slaves while wives oftentimes supervised slaves who worked as housekeepers and cooks. Managers were responsible for setting the expectations



References: Chandler, A. D. (1965). The railroads: Pioneers in modern corporate management. The Business History Review, 39(1), 16-40. Cooke, B. (2003). The denial of slavery in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 1895-1918. Tomlins, C. L. (1988). The mysterious power: Industrial accidents and the legal construction of employment relations in Massachusetts, 1800-1850. Law and History Review, 6(2), 375-438.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    References: Gomez-Mejia, L., & Balkin, D. (2002). Management and Its Evolution (8th ed.). New York: McGraw∠'Hill.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Students enrolled in the portfolio development course will pay a $1,500.00 course fee. This fee will be refunded if students withdraw from…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    An Empire for Slavery

    • 1553 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some slaves in Texas approached responsibility for work in such a manner that they were given a great deal of leeway for their own daily job assignments and were even given supervisory positions over other slaves. Some bondsman, working as managers, tended to plantations and farms in the absence of the owners. This practice is quite remarkable when we sometimes visualize a slave as a black man with a chain and heavy ball attached to one foot. The conception of manager slaves apparently was propagated in such an…

    • 1553 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roethlisberger, F.J. and W.J. Dickson. Management and the Worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.…

    • 2889 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Very Brief History of Management Theories. (n.d.). Free Management Library. Retrieved July 14, 2010, from http://managementhelp.org/mgmnt/history.htm…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men - Analysis

    • 3439 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Wren, D. (2005). The History of Management Thought. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New Jersey. Pages 231.…

    • 3439 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gomez-Mejia, L.R. & Balkin, D.B. (2002). Management and Its Evolution, 8e. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Despite the inexactness and relative crudity of management theory, the development of thought on management dates back to the days when people first attempted to accomplish goals by working together in groups. To know something of the background of the development of management thought. 'Even limited knowledge can help one appreciate the many opinions, ideas, and scientific underpinnings which preceded the upsurge of management thought may help us avoid rediscovering previously know ideas.' (Harold Koontz, Heinz Weihrich, 1988)…

    • 2419 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific Management

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This lesson might be more appropriately called “The Revolutions of Management,” because it documents the wide swings in management approaches over the last 100 years. Out of the great variety of ideas about how to improve management, parts of each approach have survived and been incorporated into modern perspectives on management. Thus, the legacy of past efforts, triumphs, and failures has become our guide to future management practice.…

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hohoho

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Weekly Plan Module Title: Introductory Management Module Code: MGT200 Module Coordinator: Dr. Hala ElMarsafy Instructor: Dr. Emad Muhanna Office hours: (Room: B243, T 10:30-12:00) Office hours: Email:hmarsafy@gmail.com Email:emaad.muhanna@gmail.com Instructor: Dr Shura Instructor: Dr Emad Elwy Office hours: (Room: A133, S/T 10:30-12:00) Office hours: Email: shura_shawky@hotmail.com Email: emad_elwy@hotmail.com Week Starting Topics Assessment (Assignment)…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sanasa Bank

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages

    9. Robbins, S.P. & Coulter, Mary (2005). Management. 8th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall: Pearson. 52.…

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brown,G. White, G. and Redding.G., 1984. Modern management.[e-book] London: Redfern Press. Available through: Anglia Ruskin University Library <http://libweb.anglia.ac.uk> [Accessed 9 July 2011]…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Porter Michael E. Five Competitive Forces. 12Manage Executive Fast Track. Retrieved June 6th, 2008, Copyright…

    • 7944 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evolution of Management

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There were three approaches to management beginning in the late 1800s. The scientific method was developed and introduced by Fredrick Taylor, the administrative principles were views published by Henri Fayol, and the bureaucratic organization was an idea developed by Max Weber. Taylor’s scientific method developed within the manufacturing industries and had the main objective to improve economic efficiency, especially in labor productivity. Fayol’s approach was to the managerial practices. He focused on training the management instead of focusing on individual worker efficiency. He set forth the four functions of: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. Weber outlined the hierarchical structure for the management and workers to follow. The scientific approach was implemented by the management carefully selecting the most qualified worker for a certain job. In doing so, the worker’s compensation was now directly related to their production. Going along the same lines of efficiency, the administrative management principles were for teaching upper management first and then moving to improve the efficiency of workers (also called a “top down” approach). For these two approaches to work well together, there also needed to be a clear outline of where each position was in the hierarchy of authority. This is how Weber’s bureaucratic organization of three distinct management levels were utilized. While each concept was developed and implemented for the greater good and to create prosperity for everyone, they were not sustainable through the evolution of manufacturing. By applying a “science” to a skilled worker’s job, it became possible to deskill a job and eventually replace a human with a machine altogether. The administrative management principles created greedy managers that in turn created worker unhappiness. This only strengthened the labor unions in the mid-1900s. This was the…

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays