“One of the essential attributes of a state under International Law is external sovereignty, the right to exercise freely the full range of power a state possesses under international law. Recognition of a state as independent necessarily implies that the recognizing states have no legal authority over the independent state. The status of a fully independent state should be contrasted with that of dependent or vassal states, where a superior state has the legal authority to impose its will over the subject, or inferior, state.”
How can Mindanao practice the said definition of an independent state where in fact, there are many aspects which can fail us Mindanaoans in attaining such? We lack sustainability, there is a conflict in religion, and division hurts economically and culturally. These are just some of the aspects I was talking about which fails the Mindanao in becoming an Independent state.
Before independence is declared, Mindanao must show that we have the resources to be independent. Yes, we can say that we some of the resources; in fact, people from Luzon, Visayas, and even from other countries come to Mindanao to buy our resources. But the question is who will sustain them? We lack sustainability; we lack businessmen to run these said resources.
In another aspect, we can never be confident that Muslims and Christians populating Mindanao will be able to live in harmony and prosperity. We would need to go extra-mile in and work harder in order to go under one agenda. But diversity does not necessarily result in unity. That was what I meant when I mentioned about a conflict in religion. Muslims can not accept that Christians eat lechon during fiestas or other special occasions, their culture and faith says it is strictly forbidden. On the other hand hand, Christians, if for their faith as well, frown on Muslim husbands having four legal wives and call this practice adulterous. How can we really reconcile both parties?
Third, division hurts both economically and culturally. Personally, it would be so absurd and ridiculous if us travelling now to Luzon or Visayas, which some of my relatives live, would require a passport or visa. Wouldn’t it be just a hassle?
Now, with all these aspects, where will Mindanao get the source of people, peace, and comfort to run the people? If independence means unchaining Mindanao from the shackles of our national debt, that would be good, but it sounds fine only in theory. Mindanao has been receiving developmental aids yet we remain in the stage of desolation. For so long, the people of Mindanao cannot be united, in fact, no other territory in the Philippines is so fractious as Mindanao. Being an independent state will not justify conditions of governing itself. Over all, Mindanao cannot afford to become an independent state.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
2.Sovereignty: A state has sovereignty, which means independence from control of its internal affairs by other states.…
- 1422 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Whilst nation states have a responsibility to protect, state sovereignty ultimately hinders the achievement of world order. State sovereignty relies to the ultimate law-making process of a state over its territory and population, including independence from external interference, as exemplified domestically in Section 51 of the Australian Constitution. Article 2(7) of the Charter of the United Nations (UN) (1945), stipulates that ‘nothing in the present Charter shall authorize the interference of any state’. Due to the non-mandatory nature of multilateral compliance, states can ultimately impede the influence of international law and use state sovereignty as a barrier to their conduct, as shown in the conflicts of Sudan, Kosovo, Libya and East Timor. However, the nationally acclaimed benchmark ‘Responsibility to Protect (R2P) (2005)’, originating from the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty’s Report, places the onus on nation states to ensure the protection of their citizens from instances of mass atrocity. The UN, enshrining of their doctrine under paragraph 138 and 139 of the Charter of the UN, bridges the limitations of state sovereignty with international law. Unfortunately, nation states may still abstain from participation with international law…
- 966 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A close ratiocination of the instances where there have been claims for self determination one can sufficiently claim that the right to self determination and the right of a state to its sovereignty are always at logger heads. When these two rights are pitted against each other, the quest here is for the determination of which rights supersedes the other in such scenarios. It can be referred to as a difficult balancing act. In today’s multi ethnic states there clearly have to be a balance, an acceptable equilibrium between a states sovereign power and the rights of minorities which international law has been extremely succinct about which affirms the commitment of international actors and policy makers to human dignity.…
- 1735 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the context of authority, Murphy argues that international law arises from a horizontal structure, in which all 193 nation states have supreme authority in self-governing their statehood. However, Teitel disagrees with Murphy’s viewpoint because she argues that sovereignty fails to understand the challenges of security in terms of protection and preservation of the people. Her argument is based on a framework of humanitarian law where sovereign states are shifting their relations between economic development and the promotion of human rights. Therefore, it is imperative to argue that the legality of international law is changing due to the expansion of humanitarian law because it is an attempt to bridge the gap between existing legal forms.…
- 620 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Therefore, this claim means that if a state is either unwilling or unable to protect its own citizens, then it becomes the international communities responsibility to do so (---43---). Considering this, it can be said that the responsibility to protect brought with it a new understanding of state sovereignty, putting emphasis on the state to manage its internal…
- 1419 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
This means that no authority is legally above the state. The states are not obliged to agree to the international law and apply it within their state because of state sovereignty. This may be a reason in which why torture still exists in the world today as it has not been entirely abolished because some states have not agreed to apply the international laws dealing with torture within their state e.g. UNCAT where some states have both signed and ratified the convention, states have signed but not ratified and other states which have not signed nor ratified the covenant such as Papua New Guinea, Angola, Zimbabwe and Iran where torture is known to still occur today. As long as state sovereignty applies the nation state cannot have any external interference and therefore cannot be influenced as to whether the nation state should apply the international law into their state or not. This limits international law from becoming affective into the nation…
- 1445 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Recognition of self-determination in international law is new. International law has adopted self-determination as a right in 1941 by UN charter, but from the beginning of the civilization the desire for self-determination was there. Debate over this topic is like never ending saga, as it’s related to government, peace, war, right, aggression etc. The book I have chosen to review is a research monograph, written by Elizabeth Chadwick, entitled as “Self-determination in the Post 9/11 Era”. Where she wanted to argue that- the position of “self-determination”became more complex than ever as post 9/11 incident of terrorist attack by Al Qaeda on New York, Washington DC and Pennsylvania increased the tendency of the government to incorporate self-determination into anti-terrorist agenda. I should disclose the reason why I chose the book. It’s because, the term self-determination has lost its original meaning…
- 1802 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Within the international system, sovereignty is the term used when the state is able to possess full autonomy whilst accepting mutual recognition of other claims to sovereignty. ‘Internationally, sovereignty served as the basis of legal equality, and therefore as the basis of diplomacy and international law.’ (McLean and McMillan 2005: 503). When looking at this concept with regard to the development of the European Union and the pooling of sovereignty within the member states, it is important to consider how significant sovereignty is to individual states.…
- 580 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
It is argued that statehood is attained after the fulfillment of certain prerequisites or “criteria”. Nevertheless, the application of criteria is not without problems: “The multi-criteria nature of concept, the tangled web of historically-specific pathways of state development, and differences in state forms have all contributed to substantial theoretical difficulties in reaching any wide agreement about how to define ‘the state’” (Dunleavy, Patrick,2007) What instruments have attempted to define the idea of the state? Max Weber's classic definition remains to be highly influential. His definition claims that a state is an organization which “(successfully) claims a monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory”. The Montevideo Convention is another source that is often cited as a guide in determining statehood. According to the Convention, a state should harbour a defined territory, a permanent population, and a government with the capacity to enter into relations with other states. So, is meeting these preconditions enough to be considered as a state, or does being recognized as a state define statehood? Malanczuk argues the following: “recognition is one of the most difficult topics in international law. It is a confusing mixture of politics, and international law the legal and political elements cannot be disentangled; when granting or withholding recognition, states are influenced more by political than by legal considerations, but their acts do have legal consequences. Herein, statehood becomes politically charged, and the influence of power may have a definitive effect on an entity's legal status as a state or not.…
- 3229 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Sovereignty no longer exclusively protects States from foreign interference; it is a charge of responsibility where States are accountable for the welfare of their people. This principle is enshrined in article 1 of the Genocide Convention and embodied in the principle of “sovereignty as responsibility” and in the concept of the Responsibility to Protect.…
- 565 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
“It cannot seriously be argued today that International law prohibits secession. It cannot seriously be denied that international law permits secession. There is a privilege of secession recognized in international law and the law imposes no duty on any people not to secede.”2…
- 3520 Words
- 15 Pages
Powerful Essays -
One of the potential contributors to the large productivity gap between developed and developing countries are low quality infrastructure. In the summer of 2012, India suffered the largest power failure in history, which plunged 600 million people into darkness for two days. Even under normal circumstances, however, the Indian government estimates that shortages currently amount to about ten percent of demand at current prices, and many consumers have power only a few hours a day. In the 2005 World Bank Enterprise Survey, one-third of Indian business managers named poor electricity supply as their biggest barrier to growth. According to these managers, blackouts are far more important than other barriers that economists frequently study, including taxes, corruption, credit, regulation, and low human capital. (Hunt Allcott, Allan Collard-Wexler, and Stephen D. O’Connell 2014)…
- 5478 Words
- 18 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Thus, it was pointed out that “general welfare” should really mean “ikabubuti ng nakararami” while “common good” shall mean “ikabubuti ng lahat”. Thus, all efforts and rules of society and government should be for the welfare of all, without exceptions. “The patrimony of the Nation” now read “our patrimony”, to make it more emphatic, a Nolledo amendment. The words “blessings of independence and democracy”, an Edmundo Garcia amendment, to underscore the importance of true independence even in the presence of democratic beliefs and…
- 298 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Since the start of the administration of President Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III in July 2010, one of his aims in able to keep our national territory secured. Also, we are aware on the present conflict in Mindanao especially in the portion of the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao which in many decades, many people was sacrificed especially the officers and members in military and police and the civilians which some of them are migrated to other parts of the country and most of them are now in Metro Manila in order to escape the violence. At the present, we are very much aware on the diplomatic relations with our neighboring countries which some of them are rich in natural resources especially gas deposits which is very helpful to our economy…
- 1379 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
It is said that people deserve the kind of government they have. In the case of the Filipino people, they went through a lot of stages, both forceful and peaceful, in their quest for political maturity and independence.…
- 493 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays