Preview

Military Leadership Philosophy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
531 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Military Leadership Philosophy
There are many different styles of leadership in the Army and the civilian sector. Because of my civilian experiences in corporate America, my leadership philosophy matured prior to joining the Army. Over the last 6 years in the mighty United States Army, I implemented the leadership experiences that I acquired in the Army doctrines. Consequently, my leadership philosophy morphed into a situational leadership philosophy. So far, this philosophy has not fail me yet. Applying situational leadership style, helped me mitigate every situation thus far, in my opinion, it is useless to have a vision, a set philosophy, categories and sub-categories of what you value as leader; without being adaptable. A situational leadership will always adapt …show more content…
In other words, we readjust or react to fire as any wise infantryman can attest to this statement. We essentially cannot solve every day issues and complex issues by a simple answer. Situational leadership, enables me to reach my Soldiers or mission needs with small degrees of difficulty. When my Soldiers are going thru crisis, I as a leader take a moment to assess the situation and figure out courses of actions based upon the best outcomes. For example, if one of my Soldiers is going thru financial difficulties, the first step is to find out all the facts of the situation and refer him or her to resources like Army Emergency Relief (AER). However, if the Soldier previously used AER to resolve a previous financial issue, then AER may not be a viable solution.
Situational leadership is important to me. This type of leadership paid dividends in the past. So far, every situation or mission flung my way and been resolved or accomplished. My Soldier had been receptive to my leadership style and I had learned from my Soldier as well. Furthermore, situational leadership, in my opinion, gives me the flexibility to be a chameleon and espoused other leadership types pending on the situation at hand. In my experiences, every single day brings a new or complex

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    My leadership philosophy is I believe in leading by example and treating people with respect and honesty. I support my peers and subordinates alike through accomplishing my task and learning to overcome diversity and adapt. As a Non-commissioned officer, I strive to develop my Soldiers, my peers, and myself. I believe in a team approach and good communication to be successful.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. My Leadership Philosophy is created for my Soldiers; past, present, and future to carry on and adapt as leadership comes in many styles. I will highlight the core of my philosophy, so all Future Soldiers will know my intent; lead by example, competence, and professionalism.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a Non Commission Officer in the United States Army, my leadership philosophy is simple. Taking care of each other is always a priority. Supporting our patients, comes first as we are responsible for ensuring the health and wellbeing for some of our finest men and women in America. Ensuring the wellbeing being of Military family member is also a priority as that gives our troop a peace of mind and therefore are able to focus on the mission rather that worry about what is going on at home.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    My leadership philosophy is about making genuine connections to people. In order to influence people to be great leaders, all the key factors should be tapped in to in some capacity. I make sure my actions speak louder than my word. I lead by example by rolling up my sleeves and showing team members I am not just an army civilian but a part of the team. This philosophy applies to my life whether at work or home. I credit these key factor as the core of becoming a great and effective…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I don’t believe anyone could argue that it takes a good amount of leadership in order to become a successful United States Military Academy cadet, as well as an officer in the United States Army. This is almost certainly one of the first things someone would look for in a strong officer. A strong leader can impact his soldiers in various ways. If your soldiers don’t stand behind you, and don’t have faith in you, they are more prone to disagree with or disobey your orders.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How are our leaders adapting to today’s society and their demands on the military as a Profession? There must be a balance maintained in order to keep up the profession as we have come to see it. The relationship between the Army’s four fields of expertise and its current and potential operating environment and then the relationship between the Army’s culture and climate. (Army White Paper, 2010) For instances surrounding the imbalance of our relationship between the Army’s four fields of expertise and its operating environment, leaders must reassess their shortcomings in an operational capacity to see where it can improve to continue to provide security for our society. Adapting its doctrinal, material and operational styles to the ever-changing battlefield. (Army White Paper, 2010) Leaders must also ensure that our culture and climate at indicative to producing Soldiers that feel they are serving a calling and not just filling a job…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military leadership isn’t simply about leading a group of individuals to accomplish the mission. On the surface it may seem this way; a barrage of loud, authoritative orders being barked out to brainwashed enlistees. This is how the preponderance of the masses that aren’t associated with the military may see us. However, it’s much, much more than that. Military leadership is about leading individuals to become something more than they ever thought they could be. To develop an individual into one of integrity and excellence. To help them reach goals they never thought possible and to consider a world beyond their own. Truly, there is no other form of leadership quite like it.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first strength of the situational approach is that it has been very successful for many years and it is frequently used in training programs by many Fortune 500 companies. Because of this, many corporations believe it is an effective model to help ensure that their leaders are successful. The next strength of this theory is that it can be easily learned and it is applicable in many situations such as home life, educational settings, and the workplace. A third strength to this approach is that there are different types of styles of leadership and guidelines that can be applied to each specific style and situation. Situational leadership also allows for flexibility based on the needs of others and that leadership can change based on the specific needs. Finally, this leadership style allows leaders to adapt the assistance given to meet the needs of the unique individual so they can become better at performing their tasks and become better employees.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Situational leadership has very little in common with the other models mentioned herein. This model revolves around the leader changing leadership behaviors to meet the needs in relationship to the follower (Kouzes, 2003, p. 111). The difference between situational leadership and charismatic, servant, and transformational leadership is the lack of an organizational vision and the empowerment of the followers. Situational leadership uses followers based on their readiness level that relate to their ability and willingness to complete the task (Wren, 1995, p. 208). This aspect coupled with the leader’s task and relationship behavior is used in relation to the follower’s readiness level (Wren, 1995, p. 209).…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am fortunate to have served in the United States Navy for 26 years because throughout my career my style of leadership evolved as I matured and my level of responsibility increased. Initially, I was a transactional leader because it was a way of separating me from my peers to alleviate chances of fraternization. The chain of command was strict in giving direction and the expectations were exacting in standards in accordance with approved guidelines. About half way through my career, I was a middle manager and earned the respect of my peers through performance and longevity so my leadership style shifted to transformational. I was successful because my senior leadership afforded me the leeway and held me accountable for the product rather…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Adaptive Leadership Essay

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Although the author provides excellent points regarding military leadership being a good standard for the corporate world to use, adaptive leadership should not be known as the encompassing “official” leadership style of the military. The point that the author makes; attempting to convince the reader that adaptive leadership is good, is flawed because there is more than one approach to leadership in the military, and that would include a process driven leadership approach. The author shows favoritism towards adaptive leadership by using examples such as Gettysburg and Normandy, even using Marine Corps Officer Candidate School to show his MBA students how important military like thinking helps in the “real world.” The author goes on to advertise adaptive leadership as a “military” style rather…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Army Leadership are skills that every soldier should have regardless of rank. Leaders can have different philosophies. All leader's philosophies should have a positive outcome on their soldiers and leadership. My Army Leadership Philosophy focuses on leading by example, confidence and knowledge.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The situational leadership was developed and studied by Hershey & Blanchard in late 1960. It is the most acclaimed, utilized and effective leadership and influential tool in the history of the behavioral sciences (Situation.com). The situational leadership model is flexible tool, which enables different types of leaders and management to influence others effectively. This model stresses on the importance of the relationship between the leaders and the followers, but serves as a framework while analyzing every situation regarding the readiness level, which follower display, amount leadership and social economic support that leaders provides (Situation.com).…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first strength of situational leadership is its practicality. Situational leadership is easy to understand, intuitively sensible, and easily applied in a variety of settings (Northouse 2007). Because it is described at an abstract level that is easily grasped, the ideas behind the approach are quickly acquired. In addition, the principles suggested by situational leadership are easy to apply for difference settings, including school, workplace, and family.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Situation Leadership

    • 2121 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the organization, one of the major issues was behavioral imbalance of reporting managers with their staff. As it was quite clear from complaints, some managers were very harsh and others were over generous. Huge task was to develop a leader out of them, as they did not practice true characteristics of a leader. It was inevitable for the company to overcome from this as in the long run due to lack of these critical components an organization may face inadequacy in terms of human recourse and productivity. Moreover the perceived thinking process was also a hindrance as one of the members was unwilling to change the leadership style. Looking at the current scenario, solutions are given including necessity of contingency model with the linkage of emotional intelligence at the work place, after all Leadership is a procedure which is constantly changing with phase, not an incident.…

    • 2121 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays