Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Micheal Kammens

Good Essays
687 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Micheal Kammens
Michael Kammen’s modern portrait of the Framers made the most sense. They wanted to maintain their rights, liberty, and self-government. Kammen's interpretation of the constitution makes the most sense because we can look at the Bill of Rights, the Articles of Confederation, Federalist No.51, the Virginia Plan, the Declaration of Independence, and even Montesquieu’s view of the government.
James Madison believed that the people were the source of authority for the state. The Bill of Rights was seen as somewhat of an attack on the government. It was simply to protect the individual rights and freedom of the people. The rights were freedom of speech, freedom of press, no established religion, no double jeopardy, and requirement of trial by jury. Kammen agrees that the Bill of Rights was the needed push for those who did not truly understand that the constitution was to protect the people of the state.
The articles of confederation do somewhat seem a little harsh. There was an idea that everything had to be reported back to the central power but there were underlining ideas in the articles. There initial purpose was to promote security of liberty and general warfare. Does this sound familiar? Those two things can be found in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution. "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Exactly as Kammen inferences, we have a lack of knowledge of the constitution that causes us to miss important things. The articles indeed show the assurance of general warfare. Each state is self-governed but without having to report final decisions to the central power everything would essentially be “out of wake.” Liberty is having freedom under the set rules. Each state has their freedom but is under high authority.
In the Federalist No.51, James Madison’s point was to keep separation of government and to protect the rights of the people. Just as Kammen, Madison states, “It is evident that the members of each department should be as little dependent on those of the others.” This means each department should not rely on one another rather see how other states do it alone and use their level of success to help you establish a successful self-government. James Madison proposed the Virginia Plan. He wanted to reconstruct the government just as Kammen said the people wanted to. Madison stressed the belief that a nations survival depended on federalism. Federalism is the states having their own power under the central power. Basically, they did have self-government, which was one of Kammen’s main ideas. The declaration of independence written by Thomas Jefferson completely addresses Kammen’s want for rights and liberty. Jefferson stresses the need for each person to have his or her rights. The declaration of independence can be defined as a symbol of liberty. Jefferson summarizes many already know liberties into self-evident truths. Montesquieu’s view of the government helps add to Kammen’s idea of liberty. Montesquieu defines the types of liberty. He lets us see that with dependence on others and no self-government liberty cannot be possible. For example, political liberty, Montesquieu states, “The political liberty of the subject is a tranquility of mind arising from the opinion each person has of his safety. In order to have this liberty, it is requisite the government be so constituted as one man need not be afraid of another.” As we know, one of Kammen’s main ideas was the need for liberty and clearly Montesquieu helps us understand that the reason for that need is that liberty is needed for self-government. The Bill of Rights, the Articles of Confederation, Federalist No.51, the Virginia Plan, the Declaration of Independence, and even Montesquieu’s view of the government can clearly help us understand the interpretation Kammen is making of the constitution as a source of rights, liberty, and self-government.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Regarding structure, the Articles of Confederation, or simply Articles, were relatively ‘bare-bones’ when compared to the complex constitutions and declarations of government other countries had. It laid out a simple and ultimately primitive government: the power of the government was to lie solely in Congress, a group of delegates from all states. It was to be Congress and only Congress to create laws and run most of the government. This concept did not work well in practice: Congress, the only branch of the government, was weak and unable to bring about policy change for the country. First, all amendments to the Articles required a unanimous vote of all thirteen states - something that was quite rare - and even the simplest of national laws required a two-thirds majority to be established. This became a major issue. As a new country, a lot of issues were going to come forth to Congress, and due to the bureaucratic rules that were in place, it was difficult for a treaty or policy to be approved. Furthermore, the Articles did…

    • 2437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the first American constitution completed by the Continental Congress in 1777. The Articles of Confederation created a “firm league of friendship” between all 13 states. Each state agreed to send delegates to the Confederation Congress where each state will cast one vote in Congress. Under the Articles Congress had no possession over trade or passing laws regarding taxes. However, Congress can declare war, appoint military officers, coin money, and foreign affairs. Unfortunately, there were some downsides to the Articles of Confederation that people from all 13 states did not agree with or argued about it such things as alliance, passing laws, courts, money, and trade. (Davidson, 189)…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation had many flaws within it; it made the States more independent but the federal government have very limited control. They weren't allowed to make trade treaties, or allowed to tax which resulted in them not being able to pay their debts. The Constitution was made to tighten up the Articles and set a standard within the States. “ All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” (A-3) This is what caused a change, and tightened up the government. The government had 3 branches now, each with its own responsibilities and neither was more powerful than the other. The legislative had the power to create a new currency…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it provided an outline to how future government should be formed, The Articles of Confederation did not provide America with an effective government from 1781 to 1789. Nicknamed “The Articles of Confusion”, The Articles of Confederation lacked stability and the power to truly govern the states. Under the articles there was no executive branch and no way for the federal government to raise money.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Continental Congress wrote the Articles of Confederation during the Revolutionary War. The articles were written to give the colonies an idea of a unified government. The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the United States and specified how the Federal government was to operate. The government under the Articles of Confederation has been considered a failure. It is evident that the Articles of Confederation had a negative impact on the colonies. Many problems began to arise due to some of the laws in the Confederation. One of the major weaknesses was how it limited the national government's power and Congress' control over the citizens in the states. Next, the…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From 1781 to 1789 the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government." During those years the United States government was still developing and the Articles of Confederation was not an effective form of government. The states had a strong objection against the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was not a government well suited for this new country. The United States needed power over the states to make it a better place to live and have separate states with different laws.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any power the legislative authorities of the central government possessed under the Articles was undone by the absence of executive authority to enforce the meager amount of verdicts that against all odds were passed. Perhaps the weakness of the Articles is to be blamed on opposing individual state interests; however, it was still the Articles that were to blame for the division of the Union nevertheless. Though some historians believe that with minor alterations the Articles of Confederation could have survived for many more years,[15] its fundamental flaw – its lack of a 3 house Congress – was destined to be efficacious in the eventually switch to the Constitution. What the Constitution really achieved for the country was a foundation of authority. It states in black and white the powers of the Congress and the rights given to enforce those powers, whereas the Articles only gave Congress an arbitrary right to rule that could easily be ignored because of its noncommittal language and potential to be…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the United States of America won its Independence from Great Britain in 1776 many Americans began to have fidelity to their states instead of their country. Diverse citizens opposed to have an influential government. As a result, to the independent views of Americans the document Articles of Confederation was proposed. It was established with the primary purpose to balance the differences between states. Over time, this document became inadequate to govern itself and protect…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America had just recently gained independence from the British Empire and was now looking for a new form of government to help support their want for a new and fairer life. The Articles of Confederation provided the thirteen colonies with a new basic government and had many policies that also included items such as foreign policy and economics. They decided to create a new set of laws that congress would follow that would limit their power so they would not repeat the same events they had already experienced with Britain, this new set of laws was called, The Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation have very valid and strong points in what they say and accomplish the task of offering a more fair lifestyle to the American people. The articles limited the government’s power and gave the people a chance to have a life free from tyranny like that one they experienced under the reign of the king of England.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were very ineffective because it didn’t give the Federal government enough power, they couldn’t enact tariffs and each state did what was in the best interest of its own state not what was best for the country as a whole. The Articles of Confederation was more of a league of friendship than an actual government. The mere fact that it took four years to ratify should have warned the country of its shortcomings. It was very difficult to amend the Articles because a unanimous vote from each state. Under the Articles of Confederation, there wasn’t even a national currency.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were created in order to establish government between the 13 states. They were the first constitution of the United States. The Articles ultimately turned the U.S. weak and left in despair. Some of the shortcomings associated with the Articles of Confederation have to do with the states being supreme. Under the Articles, the states are sovereign and create their own laws and regulations. That led the country finding difficulty with international trade, a depressed economy due to an increase in state tax and many falling into debt.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conclusion of the convention should bring me solace but I find that it only brings me distress for the future of our country. I do not believe that we established a wise and just government. I believe that this government is destined to either become a monarchy or fall into the hands of a corrupt and oppressive aristocracy. Granting the plan we decided upon is superior to The Articles. The Articles of Confederation was a government that should have never been thought up. There were too many weaknesses under the Articles of Confederation. Congress had an extremely difficult time passing laws due to the fact that 9 of the 13 states had to agree before any laws could be passed. Since there was no president or an executive branch, there was no way to make sure that laws passed by Congress were carried out. There were no courts to interpret laws or to judge those that broke them because a national court system did not exist. To make matters worse, changing the Articles of Confederation was nearly impossible. A unanimous vote of all 13 states was required before any changes could be made and having that happen was nigh impossible. Not only was there a problem with the laws but congress did not have the power to collect the taxes needed to pay for the expenses of the national government! Congress could ask for money, yet it had no power to force the states into paying them. Without money, Congress could not pay the nation's debt nor could it provide government programs and services. Another Problem under the Articles was that the national government could not control trade between the states or with foreign nations. Each state regulated its own trade, which resulted in many disputes among the states and with other nations as well. In addition, most states made their own money. Without a constant national currency, trading was a difficult process. The Articles made each state act like a small, separate nation. The people of each state saw themselves as citizens…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main idea of the Articles of Confederation was to make the states come together. Many people of the nations had agreed, but some people did not understand the complete purpose of this new government. many of the strengths were that the nation was able to make peace/declare war with other nations. It encouraged cooperation with other states. But where there is strengths there are also weaknesses.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Articles of Confederation were a great start to shaping and unifying our country, but it was just that, a “start”. It needed to take the country as a whole into consideration in order for it to hold this unity in place. The Articles of Confederation led to the Constitution of the United States. Although similar in some aspects, very different in others. The articles had many weaknesses that were changed in the Constitution. There were many compromises made between the states in order to effectively draft the Constitution. Roger Sherman’s Plan kept the Constitutional Convention together which was later known as the Great Compromise. The fight for the Constitution had just begun and the ratification processes needed to take place. Even with some states being in favor of the Constitution it would take time to get the nine states needed to complete this process. The states in favor would called themselves The Federalist and those opposed were called the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist set out to change the mind of the remaining states with a series of letters that were written to newspapers.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays