Preview

Meursault

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
947 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Meursault
How does Geographical Circumstance affect the Outcome of the Book?

Our lives are a product of the society we live in and the essence of who we are is directly influenced by our surroundings. Geography is a big fact that influences the outcome of this book because of the colonial power that controls the country. The setting of the story, Algeria is part of the reason that leads to the punishment that Meursault receives. On top of that there are flaws in the French judicial system that allow for Meursault to receive a death sentence. Religion also plays a big part in the outcome of the book because of its influences the way that society looks at criminals. Based on the circumstances Meursault was indeed very unfortunate to be sentence to death.
…show more content…
For example there seems to be very little separation between church and state because the examining magistrate "thrust the crucifix under his nose," (p. 68) while he was questioning Meursault. On top of the influence Christianity has, Islam is also present, since it is a predominantly Arab country. This is shown during his final speech when the prosecutor says, "he'd peered into his soul and found nothing." (p. 97) Once again religion's influence on society is exposed and we see that Meursault was not only being tired by the law of he land, but also by its religions, something which would never happen in Canada during this time period. When Meursault's lawyer also discusses his soul it show how deeply ingrained religion is within the people who live in this country. It is obvious how the so-called ‘law' is tilted against Meursault, since he is a non-believer in God. What further adds to his problems is that the sentiment of the people is that if you do not believe in God you cannot be sorry for your sins or ask for forgiveness. Therefore they conclude Meursault is not remorseful for what he has done. Meursault also refuses to life, something that is considered to be the right thing to do in may religions. Ironically, this quality is what ends up sentencing him to have his head cut off. One could almost say he was willing to die for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The book starts off with Monsieur Meursault’s mothers’ death and he received a telegram from the home he put her in saying, “Mother deceased. Funeral tomorrow. Faithfully yours.” (3) He responds to the telegram saying, “That doesn’t mean anything.” (3) This makes the reader think that he doesn’t really care for his mother and maybe he didn’t like her especially since when he asked his boss for a couple days off and his boss looked angry he said “it wasn’t my fault” (3) and “I didn’t have anything to apologize for.” (3) Even when he was offered to see his mother’s corpse for the very last time he refused simply because he didn’t want to.…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Chapter 4, “Polarization and Pluralism” Bibby explains how tensions may come about when extremists of different natures, some being very religious from others being not the slightest bit religious, come together in Canada. He concludes at the end of the chapter that this balance, this polarization within Canada may actually be good for our own unique country (p.97).…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Van, Die Marguerite. Religion and Public Life in Canada: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2001. Print.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Meursault is sentenced to death by guillotine. He awaits everyday waiting for the footsteps of the men to come and execute him. During this time Meursault has done much thinking and begins to think to himself that death is inevitable. This realization of death’s inevitability constitutes Meursault’s triumph over society. Expressing remorse over his crime would implicitly acknowledge the murder as wrong, and Meursault’s punishment as justified. The chaplain tries to come to him and speak to him about God, but he still is unwillingly to accept that there is a God.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    consummated, for me to feel less alone, I had only to wish that there be a large crowd of spectators the day of my execution and that they greet me with cries of hate." (Camus 122-3). He felt as if he was ready to live again just like Maman before she had passed away. Meursault is an absurd hero at the end because he accepted death, passing the Absurd Walls and into the absurd freedom, where one can experience life to the fullest.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This story further adds to the theme of absurdism throughout the novel because there was no reason for the son to die such as there was no reason for the Arab to die. During Meursault’s trial, there is an attempt to create a reason for his crime despite there not being one. Unlike the philosophy of absurdism, the court believes in reason and order which leads to the establishment of a cause for Meursault’s crime even if it is false. Once Meursault is sentenced to death, he realizes that he no longer has the choice between life and death that all humans are given in life. He instead has death as his only “choice”. Through this, he sees that there is no difference between dying from execution and dying in the future from a different cause. Meursault then accepts that the world is as indifferent as he is to people and finds peace in this realization.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The only difference is, Meursault’s attempt to integrate himself into European culture is also the action that defined him as an outsider. During an encounter with an ‘Arab’, Meursault “fired four times at the motionless body... and it was like knocking four quick times on the door of unhappiness” (Camus, 59). At that time in Algeria, racial tensions are high among the French and the ‘Arabs’. To try to fit in, Meursault tries to enforce the racial superiority of the French when he shoots the ‘Arab’. In his world, killing the ‘Arab’ would help him fit in, but instead he knew it did not work. He states he ‘knocked’ at the ‘door of unhappiness’ implying that he was now on the outside and his actions would disappoint whoever was inside. The house symbolizes the European divide, with Meursault being on the outside of the house looking in. Although his intentions were to assimilate, Algerian citizens saw his actions as too extreme, casting him as the…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An example of this can be taken from the very opening lines of the work in question. “Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don’t know. I got a telegram from the home: ‘Mother deceased. Funeral tomorrow. Faithfully yours.’ That doesn’t mean anything. Maybe it was yesterday.” (Camus. 3) This shows that there could be many interpretations to the text that Camus lays out. Due to the fact that it is so monosyllabic and brief we are forced to make our own assertions about what Meursault’s character is and how we have to evaluate it seeing as it is in our social customs and norms that we weigh the words of the text against Meursault. This causes split between whether or not Meursault is viewed as a relatable hero or a cold person who never truly finds out what the meaning to the absurdity in life is. The first section of the book due to lack of society evaluating Meursault other than a few brief snippets of Meursault being judged, there is no way to determine Meursault's character and opinion about it using societal norms as basis for comparison. This causes us to put Meursault on trial as a society and have Meursault fight against yet another power he cannot see, that being the readers of The Stranger. The societal norms are what is challenging…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those that have different morals or ways of life should be treated lower than others. However, the case that follows Meursault’s trial has nothing to do with what he has done, the prosecution is grabbing at straws and although the point that he is trying to make, Meursault is an immoral being that doesn’t belong in this world, is true, he went about it the wrong way. When the judge asks Meursault to explain his actions, he responds by saying that the sun was in his eyes. After the break, Meursault feels small and unimportant because his lawyer explains the order of events as if he is Meursault himself. This little bit of anger from Meursault is the first real and genuine emotion he has displayed since the book started.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To the reader it seems only natural that one should be put on trial, not for their personality, but for the harmful acts that one may commit to another person. Therefore, the idea is strongly implanted in the novel, as well as the mind of the reader, that Meursault was put on trial for murder. Nevertheless, throughout the course of the novel, it becomes apparent that he was, as a matter of fact, not put on trial for the murder of the Arab, but instead, for acting in such a stoic manner. Being the honest, straightforward man he was, he answered all questions in that same conduct. Once Meursault had been appointed a lawyer, his lawyer inquired over the events of Maman 's funeral. Meursault responded rather coldly when his lawyer had asked him if he had felt any sadness that day, saying that he "probably did love Maman, but that didn 't mean anything. At one time or another all normal people have wished their loved ones dead." (p. 65) This quotation only demonstrates that he was unemotional. Now, one must ask the following question: how does this relate to the murder of the Arab? The answer is simple: it does not relate to the murder of the Arab. Being the representative of society, the jury opposes Meursault and accuses him of not conforming to society 's natural…

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Meursault is talking to his lawyer, he is ridiculed for saying that he was ‘tired and sleepy’ on the day of Maman’s funeral, “He thought for a minute. He asked me if he could say that that day I held back my natural feelings. I said, ‘No, because that’s not true.’ He gave me a look, as if he found me slightly disgusting” (Camus 63). A man vs. man conflict is created by Meursault’s honesty and his lawyer;s aversion to his answer. Meursault’s own lawyer expresses his hostility towards Meursault, and therefore can no longer objectively and fairly defend Meursault. In addition to his lawyer’s hostility, Meursault experiences condemnation from the Magistrate after revealing he is an atheist, “… the judge would lead me to the door on his office, slap me on the shoulder and, and say to me cordially, ‘That’s all for today, Monsieur Antichrist.’ I would then be handed over to the police” (Camus 68). By using a critical tone to an ideal that all people should have faith, and those who don’t are wrong, the magistrate created an unjust prejudice against Meursault. Similiarly, during Meursault’s trial, the funeral director is testifying about the events at Maman’s funeral. “… and said that I hadn’t wanted to see Maman, that I hadn’t cried once and that I had left right after the funeral without paying respect to her grave…the prosecutor exclaimed, ‘Oh no, that is quite sufficient!’… I had this stupid urge to cry, because I could feel how much these people all hated me” (Camus 86). By using a harsh tone towards Meursault, a despairing mood is created regarding Meursault’s fate. The prosecutor knows that because man is subjective, a jury…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout The Stranger by Albert Camus, the protagonist, Meursault, is worried about being judged. The reader does not realize that Camus sets us up to constantly judge Meursault. Meursault is very analytical and can seem to be insensitive at times. However, Meursault’s actions can be taken many different ways. The ending leaves the reader to give a final judgment on whether Meursault is a menace to society or not. Meursault should not have received the death sentence because he was judged for his behavior leading up to his crime, not the murder itself.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the first portion of the book Meursault comes across as someone who does not care about anyone or anything. On the very first page when he is talking about his mother’s death, Camus shows that Meursault does not care in these three sentences, “Maman died today. Or yesterday. I don’t know” (3). Nathan A. Scott makes the remark about this portion of the book, "the lifeless monotone of the speaker [Meursault] intimates that the issue is of no consequence to him" (34). Saying that Meursault’s monotone voice gives the impression he has no emotion towards his mother’s death, and that he feels no sorrow about it. In the first three sentences of the book, it shows Meursault as an uncaring person. Later once again Meursault’s heartless attitude is shown. While Meursault talks about his relationship between himself and Marie, he says, “She [Marie] asked me if I loved her. I told her it did not mean anything but that I did not think so” (Camus 35). In the time he is with Marie, it seems as if he cares about someone until this line of the book he shows that he does not care.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Meursault is condemned not for the murder of the Arab but for not meeting society’s expectations…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the magistrate keeps on trying to force Meursault to go back to God and start believing in christianity and the existence of God. Refusing salvation, Meursault is somehow rejecting any system that is forced upon humanbeings. To Meursault, by accepting christianity, he is adapting to the idea that the universe is rational and meaningful. Another scene explaining the idea of the denial of God is through the encounter amongst Meursault and the chaplain happens. Meursault refuses the idea of someone lecturing him towards christianity or God. Though the chaplain tries to force Meursault into christianity, he tries talking to him in a soft tone by mentioning how Meursault has goodness in him but he does not know. However, Meursault becomes very angry with the chaplain and refuses to see him for the third…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays