Preview

Messenger Act 1 Scene 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1189 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Messenger Act 1 Scene 1
Scene 1, Act 1.

Details-The Royal Advisor is trying to convince the Duchess to make Alliances with France and Britain.

Royal Advisor: My queen you must choose a country to fight with. We are not strong on our own and we have what others need. Please think twice about your decision. I beg you. I understand that you are having trouble with choosing, but when you choose, choose carefully. I can help you if you would only listen to me. You are in charge of Russia while Tsar, Nicholas II, your husband is on his trip. This will not only benefit Russia, but your children’s futures. Think of sickly Alexei. I am only doing this to help. Please trust me.

Queen Alexandra: I don’t know….this is something my husband would do it he were here. I
…show more content…
Shall we go?

Messenger 2: We shall.
(both ride on)
Scene 3, Act 1

Details-The messengers finally arrive at their destination. They ask the guards to see the Duchess, and are granted permission. They walk in ,greet the Queen, and they each take turns presenting themselves and their countries. They also bestow gifts and letters from both their rulers explaining what the rulers are willing to give and what they expect in return from Russia.

Messenger 1: (bows) Your Majesty, Georges Clemenceau, the ruler of Britain would like to ask you to make an alliance with us. He has sent a letter and a gift to help with your decision. I would like to point out that the other messenger is from France, and that France and Britain have already made an alliance. (hands gift and letter) Thank you. (bows and walks away)

Queen Alexandra: Thank you very much for the delivery and speech Evangeline. Please step forward Angeline.

Messenger 2: (bows) Queen Alexandra, I am also here on behalf of my country. We would like to ask you to make an alliance with my country, France. On behalf of my country I have this gift for you.(hands the gift over) I also have this letter That my Queen has written for you. (gives the letter) Thank you for your time. (bows and walks away to join up with the other
…show more content…
I will make sure to give these to my ruler and to tell her that she has made a very wise choice and I know she will be very happy for her decision. (bows and exits)

Messager 2: (steps forward) I also thank you. I will make sure to give these to my ruler and to tell her that she has made a very wise choice and I know she will be very happy for her decision. (bows and exits)

Royal Advisor: My Queen I think that you have made a wise decision in choosing both France and Britain. They will give us a very good chance to win this war and come out strong and proud as all great rulers do.

Queen Alexandra: I appreciate your support and I also believe that this is possibly the best decision that I will ever have to make at a time such as this.
(Grins proudly and dismisses her advisor)
*Tsar, Nicholas II : the part about his children’s futures is historically incorrect because him, his wife, and his children were all killed by a firing squad. So in other words, they did not have a future.

Royal Advisor: This happens to also be historically incorrect their advisor was really Rasputin, but he was an evil, rude, disgusting man, so I decided to make up a fake advisor named Darina, whose name means ‘Upholder of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ivan IV died without and heir which led to power claims by the boyars-“the time of troubles” plus…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is interesting that because of the diplomatic blunders, England reopened the war with France being absolutely…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Romanov Dynasty

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Nicholas II, the last tsar of Russia, had neither the qualities nor the desire to rule imperial Russia. Born in Tsarskoye Selo in 1868, Nicholas was the eldest son of Alexander III, the fearsome tsar who had reimposed autocracy and oppression on the Russian empire after the murder of Alexander II. Those who met the young tsarevich, described him as pleasant and likeable, but otherwise unremarkable – hardly the traits of a man ordained by God to rule Russia. Nicholas famously expressed reluctance about taking the throne, declaring that he “never wanted to rule”. But tradition…

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under Nicholas, the people suffered from his draconian policies, inciting a series of revolts. The Czar’s significance comes from his role in starting the Russian Revolution, which ended a backwards Russian Empire and created the Soviet Union, a state that influenced the world today. A person today can learn from the Czar’s mistakes and use them in daily life; for example, one can learn to listen to the problems of others before making a major…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1894 Russia’s last tsar, Nicholas II, inherited the throne when he was unprepared to do so. It is hard to do something when you are not ready. It is like letting a bull out of the chute when you were not ready, so you fall, but in Nicholas’s case a lot of things came down with him.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II’s lack of military experience and inability to rule the throne all together, additionally contributed to the devastating outcome of WW1 on Russia. “A quick intelligence, a cultivated mind, method and industry in his work, an extraordinary charm that attracted all who came near him- the Emperor Nicholas had not inherited his father’s commanding personality nor the strong character and prompt decision which are so essential to an autocratic ruler...” stated Sir G. Buchanan, British ambassador to Russia in 1910, emphasizes how the urban lower classes were not the only ones unsatisfied with the Tsar Nicholas…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When she was lecturing about the French Revolution I was envisioning the two us at the Eiffel tower, she was my queen as I laid my cape down for her – only to snap back to reality as she exclaimed “David, are you with us? Or are you in some far away place again?”…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of the speech, she explains her situation in her country, and the risk of being imprisoned “as soon as I set her foot on British soil”, but affirms that this sacrifice will be worth in the…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Don't feign innocence, you rat!” She spat at him. “I am no fool. I am Queen Elizabeth, Grand Empress of Greater Europe and Mars! It is no secret that you've wanted MY position for decades!”…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    America and Britain begin secret negotiations- GB is trying to seduce America out of their relationship with France. No better way than to split apart the alliance…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Speech Before Her Troops” is about a queen that talks to her people that she won’t let her enemies invade her country, promising the people that they will fight back and lead them to victory over their enemies. From…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexei, who puzzled the people - they didn’t know about his condition - and was seen as spoiled and unloveable by politicians, was reasonably killed. He followed his father’s way of life, one that the people of Russia greatly disliked. It also made sense that Alexandra, the tsarina, was killed, as the people mistrusted her and Rasputin. Wherever Alexandra went, Rasputin went too. On the other hand, Nicholas’s brother, Grand Duke Michael, was asked to take the throne. (He later on refused) Eventually though, as history tells, most of the Romanov family was led to their deaths. OTMA, on the other hand, were possibly murdered due to the fact that their parentage led people to believe the children would turn out like Nicholas II and Alexandra. Nicholas was actually an uneducated man. “He had few intellectual pretensions” and instead preferred to leave the politics and papers to others. His parents did not bother educating him well either; Nicholas was tutored by average and undesirable people. The upbringing of the tsar helped Nicholas rule the way he did, and look at other people the way he did. The tsar was not very smart, so he sent away all ministers that he thought were more intelligent than him due to superiority belief. The people might have thought that OTMA and Alexei would turn out the same way - as Alexei showed he…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Last of the Romanovs

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The first person to impact the fall of Imperial Russia was Nicholas II, the last Russian Emperor. In particular, Nicholas’ coronation marked the beginning of a downward spiral for the Romanov family. Tsar Nicholas II was born on May 6, 1868 and was the eldest son of Alexander III (Levykin, 1999). Nicholas II had to assume the throne earlier than the Russian population would have liked. Nicholas’ father fell ill in the spring of 1894 and his health never fully recovered. On October 20th, 1894, Alexander III died of nephritis, forcing Nicholas to become the next Tsar of Russia at a young age (Lincoln, 1976). After the untimely death of his father, Nicholas was in dismay about becoming Tsar of Russia, a position he never really wanted. This is exemplified when Nicholas II refers to being the Tsar as, “the awful job I have feared all my life” (Massie, 1967, p. 59). To further Nicholas’ fears, the Russian people and government believed he didn’t have enough political training to rule Russia effectively (Harcave, 1968).…

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical analysis

    • 280 Words
    • 1 Page

    The purpose of Queen Elizabeth’s speech at the Tilbury was to persuade her troops to believe in her and to be loyal to her. At the beginning of the speech, she addresses her troops as “my loving people”, already showing her credibility as a loving ruler. She then goes on stating that she would never dishonor her troops and that she has always done the best she could for them. In the middle of her speech she states she would “live or die, lay down for my God and for my kingdom and my people”. By using parallelism and the appeal of pathos to make her troops feel love, she shows how loyal she is and she would do absolutely anything and everything for them. Queen Elizabeth also states how mentally strong and capable she is of ruling her kingdom and people by comparing her weakness as a woman to her “heart of a king”. Towards the end of her speech, she talks about how her kingdom is so brave and vigorous, that she dares anyone to invade her “realm”, and for anyone who is idiotic enough to try she herself “will take up arms, I myself will be your general, judge, and rewarder”. She again uses the appeal of pathos by calling her troops “noble” and “worthy”, buy saying this she makes them feel important valued. She then assures her troops that they will soon have a victory over their enemies if they obey the general, concord in the camp, and have courage in the field. She ends her speech by saying “we shall have victory if we honor my God, of my kingdom, and of my people”…

    • 280 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1907 Nicholas and Alexander had asked a priest called Gregory yefimovich also known as “Rasputin”, to help pray and care for their son Alexei when he became sick. Rasputin was known for lying, an alcoholic and a women chaser.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays