Preview

Mesopotamian Unification

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2767 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mesopotamian Unification
Mesopotamian villages and towns eventually evolved into independent and nearly self-sufficient city-states. Although largely economically dependent on one another, these city-states were independent political entities and retained very strong isolationist tendencies. This isolationism hindered the unification of the Mesopotamian city-states, which eventually grew to twelve in number.
By 3000 B.C., Mesopotamian civilization had made contact with other cultures of the Fertile Crescent (a term first coined by James Breasted in 1916), an extensive trade network connecting Mesopotamia with the rest of Ancient Western Asia. Again, it was the two rivers which served as both trade and transportation routes.
The achievements of Mesopotamian civilization
…show more content…
Penalties for criminal offenses were severe and varied according to the wealth of the individual. According to the code, there were three social classes in Babylonia: an upper class of nobles (government officials, priests, and warriors), the class of freemen (merchants, artisans, professionals, and wealthy farmers), and a lower class of slaves. An offense against a member of the upper class was punished with more severity than the same offense against a member of a lower class. The principle of retaliation ("an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth") was fundamental. It was applied in cases where members of the upper class committed criminal offenses against their own social equals. But for offenses against members of the lower classes, a money payment was made …show more content…
To insure that accusations were not brought lightly, the accuser in cases of murder was responsible for proving his case against the defendant. If the accuser could not, he was put to death. Providing false testimony in a murder case meant the same fate.
Hammurabi's code took seriously the responsibilities of all public officials. The governor of an area and city officials were expected to catch burglars. If they failed to do so, public officials in which the crime took place had to replace the lost property. If murderers were not found, the officials had to pay a fine to the relatives of the murdered person. Soldiers were also expected to fill their duties. If a soldier hired a substitute to fight for him, he was put to death, and a substitute was given control of his estate.
The law code also extended into the daily life of the ordinary citizen. Builders were held responsible for the buildings they constructed. If a house collapsed and caused the death of its owner, the builder was put to death. Goods destroyed by the collapsed must also be replaced and the house itself rebuilt at the builder's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    14. Sumer was located in southern Mesopotamia and was divided into different city-states. What’s a city-state?…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mesopotamia, “the Land between Rivers,” was one of the greatest and the oldest ancient civilizations of the world. This civilization flourished around 3000 B.C. on the piece of fertile land, now known as Iraq, between the rivers Euphrates and Tigris. Before 1792 B.C., the city-states of ancient Mesopotamia were not united and constantly clashed in turmoil and warfare. In 1792 B.C., King Hammurabi conquered and merged the neighboring city states of ancient Mesopotamia, creating a Babylonian empire and becoming the sixth king of its capitol city, Babylon. During his reign, Hammurabi established law and order and funded irrigation, defense, and religious projects. He personally took care of and governed the administration. In fact, in 1786, he wrote two hundred eighty-two laws governing family, criminal punishment, civil law, ethics, business, prices, trade, and every other aspect of ancient life—this set of laws became known as “the Code of Hammurabi.” Carved upon a black stone eight feet high where everyone could read them, this Code was an improvement from previous lawless dynasties. However, these laws—compared to some other ancient laws such as the Mosaic Law and Roman Justinian Code—were unfair, unjust, and based on the social classes.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    hammurabi's code was fair for property law. If an man break in your house and steal from you he’s kilted. If an man break in your house and steal something and can't find him the city will replace what is stolen. ( Doc. d ) because the robber may have stolen something you need to survive.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early civilizations often had many similarities in their politics, economies, and social norms. The civilizations of Mesopotamia, or the Fertile Crescent (3000 BCE), and the Nile River Valley (3000 BCE) are prime examples of this, but with different geography, leaders, and resources many differences divided the two nations. Both the Nile River Valley and the Fertile Crescent had authoritarian governments and mainly agricultural economies, but the Nile River Valley was much more unified, while Mesopotamia’s city-states were constantly battling. Even though both nations were dynasties, they found their leaders in different ways.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    History: Hammurabi's Code

    • 930 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Code of Hammurabi illustrates the class structure that the Babylonians had, and was strategically created with this in mind. The Amelu, or what we today would call the upper-class, had the power to demand more severe punishments but they also received harsher punishments if they were to break the law. The middle class, or the Mushkinu did not receive as harsh punishments or steep fines. However, they were limited in religious aspects and required to give money to people they harmed. The slaves were treated as little more than property. They were able to do business, own their own property, and purchase their freedom. They had to endure the harshest, most severe punishments.…

    • 930 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi Dbq

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In law 21 it states that if a man has broken into a house to rob they therefore well kill him. How is this Just you ask, in mesopotamia they had to be strict about things or else people would do whatever they want whenever they want. So in law 21 when it states that they shall put the man to death it’s therefore preventing people from doing it in the future because the punishment is so rough. In law 23 it states that if a robber is not caught the victim shall state what he lost before a god and the city mayor shall replace what he lost. This is very Just because, the person who got robbed gets the stuff they lost back. In law 53/54 if a man has flooded his neighbor's field the man he flooded the field must restore the crop he has caused to lost. Moreover this law is very just because the man who flooded the field has to pay for his mistake and restore the other man’s crops that were lost. In a like manner all of the laws for property are majorly…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 3500-1500 BCE, Mesopotamia and Egypt emerged as two of the first river- valley civilizations. Although they came to be around the same time, they became different in their cultural aspects, such as universal views and classes, and economies due to differences in commerce.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hammurabi Structure

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People's welfare was regarded very highly in the kingdom and certain laws were put in place to protect it. The law covers modern crimes such as cheating, stealing and lying with punishments ranging from hands being cut off to death. Hammurabi also enforced laws to counter re-offenders. The code emphasises and represents similar connections with historic laws and modern day laws.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia Social System

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are some stark differences in the social structure when comparing Mesopotamia and India in the early time of the world, but there were many similarities as well. Religion was very powerful in that time and helped guide the social structure. In Mesopotamia you had a central monarchy that introduced the code of Hammurabi, while India lacking any form of bureaucracy followed a stringent caste system that has evolved and a form of it still used today.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the ancient world there were many different aspects to developing culture. The Mesopotamians, Hebrews and the Egyptians shared many characteristics while at the same time differed greatly. Considering their views towards gods, social order, and life after death, one can discover the lives of the ancient people. Illustrations of their literature, art, and architecture help reveal this information. Although these different civilizations had similar living conditions, the way that they developed different aspects such as gods, social order and beliefs about life after death resulted in completely diverse cultures.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Code Of Hammurabi Essay

    • 2635 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Punishments for crimes under the Code of Hammurabi were more severe for the lower classes. P10…

    • 2635 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi was ruler of the Babylonian dynasty from 1792-1750 B.C. And is responsible for one of the earliest legal codes in history The Laws. The Laws is a form of constitution, an organized code of social rules, rights of people and legal standards. Hammurabi felt that he was a sort of instrument of the gods and that it was his role to implement The Laws as a form of righteous justice with a divine authority. The underlying principle for The Laws is an “eye for an eye” having cause and effect for physical actions and moral situations while setting economic standards. A good example of The Laws having a cause and effect while setting an economic standard is stated “If a man gives to another silver, gold or anything else on deposit in the presence of witnesses and the latter disputes with him or denies it, they shall call that man to account and he shall double whatever he has disputed and repay it.” It sets a standard for putting a deposit down and also sets an effect should one of the parties try to lie about that deposit. The Laws was ahead of its time in many aspects however slavery is legal therefore everyone is not seen as equal. Even if the penalties were not carried out The Laws would have worked as a threating devices letting the people of the land know of the potential consequences of the actions. Unlike Hammurabi’s code the Ten Commandments list guidelines on worship and holy days. And offers worship as a form of retribution instead of the real literal form of physical retribution found in Hammurabi’s code. One example of a law that is similar, deals in financial matters and states “If a man delivers to his neighbor money or goods to keep and it is stolen out of the man’s house. If the thief is found he shall pay double. If the thief is not found the owner of the house shall come near to God, to show whether or not he has put his hand to his neighbor’s goods.” This is very similar to a law found in Hammurabi’s code in which the repayment amount is…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hammurabi and Law Codes

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The social aspects of the law codes of Hammurabi and Ashoka differ greatly. Ashoka’s laws reflected a strong belief in ethics and dharma resulting in a dynasty that lacked a caste system. Hammurabi’s laws on the other hand, focused more on punishment and social status. Mortality took a strong hold in Ashoka’s laws mainly because Buddhism and Jainism influenced his views. These two religions rejected the Hindu belief of the caste system and also influenced Ashokas definition of Dharma. One law plainly stated, “Dharma is good, but what does Dharma consist of? It consists of a few sins and many good deeds, of kindness, liberty, truthfulness, and purity.” This law clearly satisfied the views of all the religions making sure mortality and all followed dharma. Ashokas laws being based off religious ideas also encouraged ethical social behavior. Ashoka let his people define their own views on mortality as long as they were moral in daily life giving them more flexibility. Ashoka’s law code had also set into place Mortality Ministers who were used to promote consciousness social behavior throughout his empire. This was because mortality and “self” were two highly promoted ideas and kept crime rates low. Asoka ‘s laws on punishment were influenced by the Buddhist and Jain religion’s dislike of violence. His laws lacked severe punishment because of these views, but Ashoka made it clear that he had the right to punish despite his beliefs in order to lower the crime rate. In contrast, Hammurabi’s laws were solely based on the enforcement of the social…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia is often referred to as the first civilization in history. Named after it’s geographical location, “land between two rivers,” Mesopotamia was settled between the…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like most civilizations of that time, the power of the people was held in the hands of the person in charge of the grain. In both Mesopotamia and Egypt, someone was appointed to be in charge of the grain and other agricultural products, on the other hand, the person in Mesopotamian culture that was in charge of the grain was usually a priest, and in Egypt it was usually an appointed official. City-states made up the Mesopotamian societies, and often neighboring empires invaded each other. Conversely, the Egyptian invaders were mostly from other areas of Africa rather than neighboring people. The reason behind the different types of invasion was due to the way the civilizations were split up. Egypt split in two, lower and upper Egypt, and Mesopotamia did not have definite territories in it, because of the way it was split, it effected where trading was possible. Trade routes accurately illustrate the way both societies interacted with surrounding empires. Both empires traded with the surrounding peoples, however, the Egyptians expanded their trade networks much farther than the Mesopotamians. The two civilizations did however trade with each…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics