Preview

Meno's Geometric Argument

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Meno's Geometric Argument
October 1, 2013
Geometric Argument: Are Souls truly immortal and know all? In the Meno, Socrates tries to walk Meno through the discovery of if virtue can be taught. Along the way they come across the theory that if virtue can be taught then it is knowledge. If knowledge then it can be taught but the Geometric argument was brought up where a person can have the capacity to learn based on their previous life and their soul conjuring up prior knowledge to understand the topic. Socrates called upon a slave, a person who has no formal education and walked him through a geometry problem. This problem was meant to illustrate that a person’s knowledge is not based on what this person has learned in their lifetime but their capacity and ability to understand is based on what their soul has learned in previous lifetimes. Socrates uses this example show his thesis is true but what about different scenarios that aren’t math based and through different problems you can see that Socrates theory is half correct and that there are several implications that prove that souls don’t know it all. To fully understand the Geometric argument you must know that Socrates believes that souls are immortal and before they inhabit a human’s body they were exposed to everything. In order for a human to learn something, all that person has to do is experience it during their lifetime. This means that everyone has the capacity to learn, they just need to be taught. Socrates takes this example to explain to a slave how he can get a square with the area of eight with using squares with the area of four. Socrates walks the slave through the problem with just questions and diagrams to show the slave what the slave has concluded. The slave at first tries to double the sides of the square from two to four to get a square of area equal to eight. He walks into a problem and realizes himself that the area isn’t eight and actually concludes that the area of this square is 16. Socrates then questions

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Socrates describes a character that had been chained up facing a wall in a dark cave. On the opposite side of the wall there was a fire, and between the fire and the chained up man, there was a walkway. Since the man was never freed from the chains, the only thing he knew was the shadows shown on the wall from the objects walking across the walkway. Once the man was let free from the chains, he was able to see what was producing the images on the wall. From there, he was lead outside to see the sun and all the earth was made of. Compared to the men still chained up in the cave, he would know the truth. The man would learn that the sun creates the seasons and allows men to see. He would know that life in the cave is not all that there is in the…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates does not in fact tell his associates anything, but rather helps them understand ideas that were already in them through his series of questions that test whether what his associate says is of truth or not, and so he is not actually giving any knowledge. In the Meno, he shows an example of what he does when he attempts to “bring forth” geometry knowledge from a Greek slave boy. The boy answers some questions incorrectly at first before stating that he does not know. Socrates then continues to ask the boy more questions, and as the boy answers them, he comes to understand it without Socrates ever actually telling the boy anything at all. Socrates then states that “Then he will have knowledge without being taught by anyone but only questioned, since he will have recovered the knowledge from inside himself” (Meno, 85c-85d). He is saying that the boy is able to gain knowledge from Socrates asking him multiple questions about it constantly, and it will come forth within his associates, without him actually telling them anything at all. He also elaborates on this type of wisdom that he has in the Apology, saying “I thought this man seemed wise to many people, and especially to himself, but wasn’t. Then I tried to show him that he thought himself wise, but wasn’t.” (Apology, 21c-21e). Here, Socrates is stating that he has no knowledge, but rather questions the ideas of his associates to help them become more wise. This also showcases the type of wisdom that he does possess, which is knowing that he does not know…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meno Paradox Analysis

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Meno Paradox starts around page 79, in these pages Meno and Socrates argue about weather knowledge is learnable or merely a recollection. Lets start by reading the “Meno Paradox”. Meno says, “How will you look for it, Socrates, when you don’t know what it is? How will you aim to search for something you do not know at all? If you should meet with it, how will you know what to look for?”(80d) My interpretation of the text is this, if you know the answer to a question you cannot gain knowledge by asking it. But if you do not know the answer to the question, you will not differentiate the correct answer when given. How can I ever truly know if something is true or false? If I could just keep going to the source of the previous answer and question weather that source is true or false? One might respond by…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “[Having] been reduced to the perplexity of realizing that he did not know… he will go on and discover something.” (Meno 84a-d, Lamb translation). He is stating here how the once “ know it all's” are now going to discover new things because now they know they don’t know everything. Socrates believed this was a way everyone should live. “Life without this sort of examination is not worth living.”(Aporia and the wisdom of emptiness, Socrates pg??). “Socrates modeled the ultimate peace within aporia in his confrontation with death, maintaining his curiosity and seriousness, his awe and levity.”(Aporia and the wisdom of emptiness, Socrates pg??) He did his best while speaking to these people that he kept the conversation serious using what he was wondering and lighting the conversation up a bit with his…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno Paradox

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Meno has progressed because he has come to some new level of understanding just by admitting he doesn’t know the answers to virtue and being willing to seek out those answers by asking them of someone who does know the answers, Socrates. Socrates doesn’t see this as enough. He considers Meno to be like the slave boy, someone who has opinions that are a compilation of other peoples’ ideas, Gorgias and Socrates, but have yet to be anything of value because these ideas aren’t his own. It is not enough to just want to know the answers if Meno isn’t willing to investigate on his own. Just as the slave boy would become an expert at geometry “if he were repeatedly asked these same questions in various ways” because he will have practiced many different variations of the same concept and will gain true understanding, Meno will only come to claim true understanding by taking the ideas of Gorgias and Socrates and making them his own by practicing his own…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Republic”, Plato’s longest work, has many views about philosophy and characters within and there is one character that truly stands out and entices you to read on until the very end; that was Socrates. Socrates was a mentor and a friend of Plato’s and in Plato’s eyes, he was a great and wise Philosopher that was a martyr for philosophy. Within “The Republic”, Plato has written a symbolic account about one of Socrates’ teachings of education or the enlightenment of the mind and soul; “The Allegory of the Cave”. In this, Socrates describes how education is important so that the mind and soul are enlightened and not forever dwelling within the shadows.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His knowledge is always in question, but if learning develops knowledge then technically both are in comparison and shape one another. In The Meno the learning that Socrates faces comes through memory and how the soul rediscovers the truth. This learning that Socrates overcomes can be taught and is put in a specific conclusion with factual evidence. This information in learning is the most confident Socrates gets, therefore this is the next step to discover knowledge. But Socrates does not confirm this or give a solid reason as to why the meaning of knowledge is important.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major themes that Socrates heavily focused on in his speech was the philosophical ideas of wisdom and a description of Socrates’ own wisdom as well. Older accusers had allegedly claimed that Socrates did not believe in gods, and instead would try to explain phenomenons through physical explanations instead, as well as the fact that Socrates would teach others how to make a weak argument triumph a stronger one by using clever rhetorics. In Socrates’ defense, he has stated that he does not have any kind of competence and expertise in any of these areas. This statement truly divides Socrates from sophists and even Presocratics, as teachers that each belong to these organizations assert that only through experience and examination they can gain…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    english paper

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”, Socrates illustrates a metaphorical story about attaining knowledge. He describes a cave with men who are chained, prisoners of the cave. They face a wall; that is all they can see because they cannot move their heads. They cannot even look behind them to see a walkway and a fire. As a person passes on the walkway, a shadow is projected onto the wall in front of the prisoners; this is all they know. Only the shadows are what is real to them because it’s all they have ever known. Socrates says, “How could they see anything but the shadows if they were never allowed to move their heads?” (Plato 479). The main point is that people cannot understand anything except what is being projected right in front of them. Socrates’ point is that society has a limited understanding of knowledge, and is ignorant about what is beyond the surroundings.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato, in his book Meno, defines whether or not virtue can be taught. He does so by presenting two different characters; Meno is just a mere prop that Plato utilizes so that he could convey his real messages through Socrates. The book is written in the dialectic style and begins with Meno’s question if virtue is teachable. Socrates responds to Meno’s question by saying that in order to answer that question, one must first know whether virtue can be defined or not. Meno attempts three times to define virtue however, each time Socrates refutes his definition with a counterargument. By the end of his third attempt, Meno calls Socrates a “torpedo fish” because he feels as if all the knowledge that he had acquired from Gorgias was replaced by questions and uncertainty. In the aforementioned passage, in the doxical context, Socrates admits he has this effect on others because he himself doesn’t know . On the other hand, in the ethological context, Socrates is mocking the teachings of Gorgias and the Sophists. Moreover, in a broader perspective, through Socrates, Plato criticizes all who pretend like they have acquired all the knowledge attainable in this world.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Meno Analysis

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates states that the human soul is immortal and it is reborn again, but it’s never destroyed. Socrates also points out that the soul has learned everything that is to know. Therefore, when we “learn” about something, it is merely just a “recollecting” what our soul’s have learned in the past. This idea is essentially the basis of the argument between Socrates and Meno. Socrates tries to prove this to Meno by calling over one of Meno’s servant and confirms that the boy has no knowledge of mathematics. At first, the boy seemed to have no knowledge about Socrates problem. But, through step-by-step questions, the boy was able to provide a correct answer to Socrates problem. Therefore, Socrates states that, since he had no knowledge of geometry in his life, he must have already known it and he was able to…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Laches

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Through a method of elenchus, Socrates aimed to prove to his interlocutor that the ideas they held about certain topics were in fact false. When a person would come to him with a question, as Laches and Nicias do in Laches, Socrates would first direct the conversation in such a way that the question lying before the men is a foundational one, and not necessarily the original question. In his explanation of this Socrates states, “So, in a word, whenever a man considers a thing for the sake of another thing, he is taking counsel about that thing for the sake of which he was considering, and not about what he was investigating for the sake of something else” (Plato 185D) and redirects the question of whether or not young boys should learn the art of fighting in armor to how to care for the souls of young men. By doing this Socrates is able to expose the very source of his interlocutors’ belief system and demonstrate that if the basis of the system isn’t true nothing built on it can be true. Socrates goes on to…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates Dialectic Method

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates is the philosopher that created the dialectic method, which is figuring out what the main thing of knowledge is. Not only that but the honesty, righteousness, and the attribute of a good character; another form of discovery. The dialectic method was intended to figure out what is knowledge, why it is so important, and the accurate definition of it. Knowledge is known for being a strong belief, if that's the case then a cat should typically know that it is a cat. Knowledge is actually a true belief, not a strong one as many people would say. Some people may assume that knowledge is just a lucky guess. What if the first day of college the professor asked a student to guess another student's name and the assumption the student made was…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Transitive: a = b and b = c → a = c or ∠A ∠B and ∠B ∠C → ∠A ∠C…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The learning paradox in the Meno describes the problem that a person cannot inquire about what they know or don’t know, because if they know they do not need to ask and if they do not know then they do not know what to ask for. For example, if you are trying to discover what a person looks like, how can you know you’ve found them if you don’t already know what they look like? As I will discuss later on, there are very few contexts in which the learning paradox is valid, this being one of them. The learning paradox was used by Socrates to try and prove innatism, that everything is inside us and has to be brought out. The idea of innatism and learning as recollection all tie together into the main theme…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays