Preview

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Who Is The Real Monster?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
886 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: Who Is The Real Monster?
When discussing the story of Frankenstein, the question of “who is the real monster” is brought up more frequently than any other question. For many there is no question that the monster is Frankenstein’s creation, while for others the answer is not as simple as one or the other. Some might believe that the creature was created in the image of its creator; that the monster took many of its characteristics from its main source of inspiration, that inspiration being Victor Frankenstein. What is for certain is that the answer to this long debated topic is more complicated than it appears.
This question is such a difficult topic to cover in that it has a plethora of unique, varying viewpoints to argue from. In many cases it can be said that the
…show more content…
While this point of view presents many valid arguments, it is limited to doing so by the simple physical meaning by which we classify something as being a “monster”. Much of this argument that the creature is the obvious choice in the “who is more monstrous” debate is based on the physical features of the creature. The label of monster that our society has continued to use for the initial creation of the word is “an imaginary creature that is typically large, ugly, and frightening”. The creature that Dr. Frankenstein created, if compared to this definition, would indeed be classified as a monster. While the creature does meet the requirements of what we know as a typical monster; large, ugly, and frightening, it is when we look deeper into the intellectual side of this so called “monster” that things begin to change. The monster that Victor Frankenstein initially created is only monstrous in the physical sense of the word. In more ways than one the monster is more humanlike that some would like to admit. It has feelings and emotions, desires and dreams, and if we were to ignore its physical appearance all together; it would be a normal human in every sense of the word. Much of the themes in Frankenstein play to this idea; this idea that something or someone can be labeled a monster simply because of their outward physical appearance. What is quite frightening about this fact is that if we were to rewrite the story of Frankenstein and replace the creature that Victor created by a human being, we as a society would not be labeling it as a monster, but instead would be labeled as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The monster, although it has acquired the name Frankenstein in popular culture, remains nameless throughout the novel, signifying its lack of acceptance in a human society. The monster’s rejection stems significantly from its appearance, ranging from its "yellow skin" (Shelley 42) and "dim-white sockets" (42) to its "straight black lips” (42) and a "shriveled complexion” (42). Shelley has clearly distinguished the monster, marking the first divide between monster and human. She has also established the initial trickling of the monster’s inability to associate with humans. In fact, the monster’s own creator, Victor Frankenstein, rejects it due to its appearance and refuses to interact with the hideous beast. The monster’s appearance prevents other characters from seriously interacting with the monster, as they form a prejudice against a non-human being. The fear of that which is non-human lingers throughout Shelley’s…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein presents that Victor’s creation is a monster and that is not true. The true monster in this story is Dr. Victor Frankenstein. Victor had one goal in creating his creature and that was to gain fame and to gain praise from his creation. The one difference that separates Victor and the Creature apart is that Victor thought that the creature was still evil in the end, but the creature realized that what he had done was…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the creation scene, the creature is portrayed as a malicious beast by Victor and the reader blindly accepts his perspective because in the reader’s mind, Victor is a human while the Creature is not. As humans, we have a tendency to sympathize with the human Victor as opposed to the non-human Creature. As the story progresses to volume two, Mary Shelley challenges the reader’s perspective by providing a panoramic view of the Creature so the reader can gain a perspective through the Creature’s eyes and thus it allows Shelley to challenge what the reader views as…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book “Frankenstein” by Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley discusses Victor Frankenstein's life before the creation and after. The monster wasn’t made for mass destruction but godful life. Seeking revenge for rejection from mankind, the creature creates loneliness in Victor’s life. The question “Is man born evil or is evil created in man by society” is answered in the book because the creature wasn’t born evil. Over the years he grew a dark side because of no guidance, rejection, failure, and jealousy.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein creates a creature who by connotative reasoning is considered to be a monster. Starting with his appearance the creature doesn’t have the friendliest façade. Appearing with tenebrous black hair, translucent veiny skin, and towering around eight feet his presence is eye-opening to say the least. Upon first glance of him it seems all, if not most, reactions are to flee as if he was a reeling predator. Imagine being called ugly by everyone you meet, and constantly…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelly tells the story of an obsessive scientist who pursues to defy nature and create unnatural life. Victor Frankenstein attends a university where he is introduced to natural philosophy and soon after becomes consumed with a project replacing all ties to the outside world and those closest to him. When Frankenstein succeeds in bringing life to an inanimate body he is set back immediately by the botched creation he has made. Without a word from the creature, Frankenstein throws a tantrum and ultimately abandons the brand new life he started. As the creature struggles on the search for love and compassion, he encounters continuous rejection because of his distorted appearance and is driven further into isolation…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By this definition, in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein both Victor and his creation can be perceived as monsters. Both characters breach socially established boundaries with the creature blurring the lines between life and death as well as humanity and bestiality through his combined circumstances of birth and outward appearance. Frankenstein’s creation is not of human origin, but rather exists as an amalgamation of corpses created through scientific experimentation, “a product of nature – his ingredients are 100 per cent natural – and yet by the process and the very fact of his creation, he is unnatural”. Admittedly, Frankenstein’s creation fits the definition of the archetypal monster as “a large, ugly, and frightening imaginary creature” however, this is only true in regards to his aesthetical appearance for he is shown throughout the novel to exhibit the essence of humanity through his morality, intelligence and emotional capacity. In fact…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No longer were monsters a product of supernatural forces, monsters were created. Yet, in order for a monster to become a monster, it cannot exist in isolation. Relating my idea of the connection between knowledge and morality in the Scientific Revolution/Enlightenment period to the monster and his body in Frankenstein, I argue that society’s knowledge of the monster is formed in one of two ways; one, through scientific creation or two, through social construction. Now, it is through (1) physical features which differ drastically from others or (2) immoral actions that one becomes a monster in their own society. In part, “monsters” are products of their own environment. What makes the creature in Frankenstein a monster is that he is both a scientific creation and his physical features and his actions of murder deviate from society’s expectations. Throughout the novel Frankenstein’s creation is never given a real name. Instead, he is called; a “demoniacal corpse, wretch, daemon, devil, monster, ogre, the being and creature” (36, 68, 102, 164, 165). Besides not having a name, Frankenstein’s creature is also described using the term deformity and monster. After society’s constant negative response to his physical appearance, the creature himself…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Frankenstein, the role of the monster and human are subtly revered with Victor considered more monstrous than the creature he created. This is because first, Victor is portrayed monstrous than the creature because he abandons his creature instead of educating and friendly introducing him to the world, which is itself a monstrous act of irresponsibility. Secondly, Victor ought to know that the creature will likely harm others, but due to his selfishness he places his family and friends at great risk. Some might say that Victor is not monstrous and disagree with the fact that he only wants creature to be killed, because he agreed to the creature that he will make the female form of the creature to fulfill the creature’s need and for his family’s…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Isolation In Frankenstein

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the novel Frankenstein, many people view the creation as the monster, which on the surface is what we are seeing by reading this text. However, as pointed out by writer Josh Traynelis, by reading into the text and digging out the small details provided in the reading, people begin to believe that maybe the creator is in fact the one that deserves to be called the monster. As pointed out in “Who’s the Real Monster?” by Traynelis, “Instead it was the extreme misconceptions of humans, resulting in extreme isolation of the creature, that caused him to become a monster,” where the isolation of the creature mainly draws back to the rejection of the creator and mankind (Traynelis, 1). The creator seemed to be disappointed with his creation,…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Who was the real monster in the book Frankenstein? In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, we see the main character, Victor, create a being out of body parts and bring it to life. Over the course of a couple years, this experiment dramatically changes the course of Victor’s life. His creature was not as he intended it to be, so he hated it. Shelley uses Romantic and Enlightenment thought in her horror novel to explain and demonstrate the different emotions of her character. In Frankenstein, Victor is unable to successfully “mother” his creation the way he had envisioned it because he never learned to truly care for others.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein’s monster is most frequently seen as, of course, a monster. He is fearsome naturally, but he has the mind and spirit of a developing human child. The creature’s youthful demeanor exhibits itself through many examples. The most prevalent childish behaviors he has are; the creature’s fear of being alone and seeking attention and love, being completely unbiased and not judgmental at the dawn of his creation, and his lack of knowledge of the world around him.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Victor Frankenstein's repudiate for the monster and the civilians reject are the outside elements that concludes in the monster becoming _______ Furthermore, while Frankenstein and his monster were conversing he reveals, “You, my creator, abhor me. Your fellow creatures spurn and hate me” (55). Frankenstein’s monster shunning and persecution resulted in him changing his personality and retaliating because, he could no longer hold his emotions within. Furthermore, his great feelings of vengeance for the society left the monster to kill and destroy. In addition, the overwhelming environmental influences of hate compels the monster to “be no more [so I] shall no longer feel the agonies which now consume me (127). Being neglected by his creator…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book, Frankenstein, Dr. Frankenstein attempts to undue the natural process, and transcend humans beyond the bounds of death. This leads to the creation of a monster, the death of almost everyone close to him, and eventually, his own death. It is a haunting statement about the dangers of attempting to go beyond nature without properly thinking about consequences, and failing to take responsibility for your actions.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Who is the real Victor Frankenstein? Many people view the creature that he created to be his alter ego. Victor’s main objective is be a “god like” being, who can disobey the laws of nature and revive the dead. However, that did not happen. Based on Freud’s theory of the ego, id, and superego, Frankenstein creates a creature that reflects his inner self. After seeing the characterization of Victor and the creature, the reader will better understand how Freud’s theories are brought into play.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays