From my interpretation of Mary Rowlandson’s Narrative, I believe it is indeed a form of propaganda. During the 1680’s colonist were less threatened by Native Americans and the idea of leaving their colony to live among them became increasingly popular. Settlers were fed up with the restrictions of colonial living. “Always concerned that sinful persons might prefer a life of ease to hard work, Puritans feared that Indian society might prove attractive to colonist who lacked the proper moral fiber”1 This fear caused for the encouragement and publication of many captivity narratives. In addition to the colonist straying away from the colony, they also began to stray from the church. Rowlandson’s narrative is seen to be propaganda simply because of the large emphasis she places on religion. The amount of bible verses throughout her narrative makes it difficult to believe that she didn’t simply place them there to convince people that God is the only reason she is alive today. This increased her reader’s faith in God compelling many of them to return to the church, in hope to be saved themselves. In saying so, I also believe that a large portion of her narrative is an accurate account of her experience as a captive. Throughout the narrative, there is large amount of detail describing how the natives treated her. She describes being treated not as a captive but more of a servant.2 Although she disliked the Natives she did not depict them as savage monsters but rather focused on how they lived a life of chaos.
In both cases, be sure you