Preview

Marxism And Inequality Of The Working Class

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
594 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marxism And Inequality Of The Working Class
Marx would argue that capitalism propelled history by dividing society into two classes, the working class and the bourgeoisie. This division is what contributed to the class struggle and inequality of the working class. The poor were forced to work for the capitalists as a result of not having the capability to own their own resources and the need for survival. Since resources and the means of production were privately owned, labour power was essential to gaining profit. Furthermore, the increased desire for consumption in modern society, meant that capitalism could only exist and be successful by exploiting the working class.

The appropriation of surplus value resulted in workers being exploited, where capitalists profited greatly off the labour of the working class. The workers were paid much less than what the product they have produced had been sold for. The surplus value was considerably responsible for the inequality of wealth that affected the working class. Not only are the workers exploited, but they were alienated from their work. Labour in capitalist societies are directed by alienation. To uphold efficiency, workers are coerced into
…show more content…
social facts); that are external and only exist as a product of social human interaction, propelled history. It propelled history by adhering norms and values to societies to limit and coerce individuals into acting a certain way to prevent deviation. He contended that in the absence of social facts, a society would find itself in anomie or the state of normlessness. Due to the individualism which prevailed in modern societies, he argued that the lack of a collective consciousness would result in anomie. These social facts contributed to the construct of crime and deviance. The consequences resulting from deviating from these common ways of acting thinking and feeling (413), deterred individuals from not behaving

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alex De Tocqueville Analysis

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Karl Marx and Frederick Engels are well known for their contributions to socio-economics which was displayed in their writing of The Communist Manifesto. Marx and Engels wanted society to establish a classless system in which the proletariat would rise up over the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie represented the ruling class which had been established as a result of the failed system of feudalism in the 1800s. Marx believed that the bourgeoisie could rule only so long as it best represented the economically productive forces of society and that when it ceased to do so it would be destroyed and replaced and eventually this cycle would continue until there was a virtually classless society. In his writing Marx argues that the proletariat needs to overtake the bourgeoisie by means of a social revolution. He believes that due to Industrialism the proletariats have learned how to work together and will thus untie to overthrow the bourgeoisie. The proletariats had become the productive class, even though they…

    • 2702 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology Chapter 9

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Critical Review: The most serious crimes are committed by those whose 
psychological profiles are normal 
Social Foundations of Deviance…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx believed that control in society was held by elite and economically-powerful groups who maintained social order for as long as it suited their own interests. However, this social dominance would eventually lead to a crisis point where the "exploited" (the working class) would challenge the "exploiting" (the elite groups) and the existing social order. It is at this point that conflict between the classes becomes the mechanism for social transformation. According to Marx, this class conflict would eventually lead to both the overthrow of capitalism and the establishment of a communist society.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx believed that capitalism contained the seeds of its own destruction. He described how the wealth of the bourgeoisie depended on the work of the proletariat. Therefore, capitalism requires an underclass. But Marx predicted that the continued exploitation of this underclass would create great resentment. Eventually the proletariat would lead a revolution against the bourgeoisie.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx determined that exploitation was an inherit part of the capitalist system, because of the class division between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx defined the bourgeoisie as those who, “own and control the businesses, factories, land and capital.” Additionally, the proletariat were the individuals who sold their labour to the wealthy. Due to the structural division between the rich and the poor, Marx believed there was a difference between law as it appears and law, as it is.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In society there are many different factors which divide us and result in social inequality. In this essay, I will be covering social class. Karl Marx believed that in society, there are two major social classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. The bourgeoisie are basically the upper class; in order for you to be classed as a part of them you must own the means of production such as factories etc. In order for these factories to run, they would need workers, which is where the proletariats come in. The proletariat only owns their labour force which they sell in order for a wage. Karl Marx stated that the proletariats are exploited through low pay and poor work conditions, but due to capitalism, we deal with it as were tied down to the economy.…

    • 699 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx posited that the two classes in a society – the bourgeoisie and the proletariat – will remain stuck in their respective classes because of the very nature of capitalism. The wealthy capital-owning bourgeoisie not only owns the factories but dominate the media, universities, government, bureaucracy, and, therefore their grip on an elevated social status is unchangeable. In contrast, the poor, working class, or the…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels define class by the attributes of a group of people or members involved. Since industrialized cities were expanding, much of the working class was in poverty. According to Marx, the triumph of one class would pave the way for the future freedom of the rest of society. The wealthy oppressed the slaves, plebeians and laborers. As new technology immersed, market forces gained strength, which allowed the middle classes to gain wealth and power from trade and manufacture. This challenged the upper class authority and the old rulers.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    General Theory of Crime

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    There has been much controversy and studies done on Gottfredson and Hirschi’s development of their book-length theory, General Theory of Crime. They discuss ideas and concepts concerning self-control and how that affects an individual’s likelihood of committing criminal acts. If a person lacks in self-control, they are more prone to being deviant given the correct circumstances and factors surrounding their situation. Considered to be such a simple theory, it offers empirical evidence and various explanations as to why deviant individuals choose a different path in contrast to non-deviant, rule-following individuals. However, while simple, it does work to explain a broad spectrum of ideas and provides space for interpretation. In this paper I will be discussing the ideas presented by Gottfredson and Hirschi in their theory regarding self-control as well as the historical and empirical studies done surrounding the General Theory of Crime.…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deviant Behavior

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Crimes and deviance are committed by people on a daily basis. Many sociologists have tried to explain the deviant behavior of individuals that may lead up to more serious crimes. Functionalist believes that crime and deviance are due to a lack moral organization within a society, reinforcement theorists suggest that an individual’s deviant behavior is obtained through the influence of others. Control theorists view crime as a chosen act that individuals take advantage of when given the chance. The conflict theory argues that individuals deliberately choose to commit deviant acts in response to political circumstances that they don’t agree with. Finally, the labeling theory claims that “deviant” behavior is the result of certain labels that…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime And Deviance 1

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To find a clear definition of deviance is a challenge. From a reactivist perspective, deviance cannot be defined specifically. It is relative to time, place and even between different social groups (Clinard & Meier, 2011). Social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction creates deviance (Becker, 1963). A normative approach would suggest that deviance is behaviour in which acts against a social norm, For example, laughing is not behaviour in which you would expect at a funeral (Clinard & Meier, 2011). Very similar to the normative approach is the statistical definition of deviance. Anything that varies too widely from the average, for instance, being left handed is deviant as most people are right handed (Becker, 1963). Where as, an absolutist approach would argue that society has a particular set of values and anyone who violates these values is deviant (Clinard & Meier, 2011). In this essay multiple theories of deviance and its relation to crime, will be explored to discover how useful labelling theory is for the understanding of the subject.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx Labour Theory

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A commodity is something that has value and can be exchanged for another commodity. Marx’s theory suggests that a commodity gains it’s value through labour power. For example, water in a lake, which is free and available for all to get, is not a commodity. If the lake dries up and a man goes and digs a spring for himself, this water then becomes a commodity. The labour value added to the water is the manual labour of digging. This water now has a value and can be exchanged for another commodity such as bread. The value of a commodity is the ‘socially necessary labour time needed to produce it’. This is the quantity of labour required by an average skilled worker to complete a task. If this concept wasn’t considered then it could be perceived that a product produced by a lazy unskilled worker would have a higher value (Strickland, 2007). This then leads us onto surplus value.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Common causes of criminality can be traced through sociological and behavioral studies of the human condition. It is a fact of life that crimes occur only in the human sphere, and social relations are therefore a major aspect in approaching the issue of criminality. With this point of departure, we can objectively mention some factors that have been identified by professional practitioners engaged in the study of criminality, among whom are psychologists, sociologists, criminologists and others.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays