Preview

Marxism and Class, Gender and Race: Rethinking the Trilogy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5187 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marxism and Class, Gender and Race: Rethinking the Trilogy
MARXISM AND CLASS, GENDER AND RACE:
RETHINKING THE TRILOGY
Published (2001) in RACE, GENDER & CLASS, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 23-33, special issue on Marxism and Race, Gender & Class. It is posted here with permission of Jean Belkhir, Editor
Introduction
A taken for granted feature of most social science publications today, especially those about inequality, is the ritual critique of Marx and Marxism in the process of introducing theoretical alternatives intended to remedy its alleged "failures." This practice became popular in early feminist literature: Marx and Marxists were criticized for not developing an in-depth analysis of the oppression of women, their "economism," "class reductionism," and "sex blind" categories of analysis. Soon after it became common place to assert that Marxism was also at fault for neglecting race, demography, ethnicity, the environment and practically everything that mattered to the "new social movements" in the West. As the movements died, scholarship informed by those political concerns flourished; the energy that might have been spent in the public arena found expression in academic programs (e.g., women 's studies, racial/ethnic studies) and efforts to increase "diversity" in the curriculum and the population of educational institutions.
Publication of the journal Race, Sex & Class (changed afterwards to Race, Gender & Class), in 1993, signaled the convergence of those political and intellectual interests into a new social science perspective that soon acquired enormous visibility, as demonstrated by the proliferation of journal articles and books with race, gender and class in their titles. This perspective, put forth primarily but not exclusively by social scientists of color, emerged as a reaction to feminist theories which neglected racial/ethnic and class differences among women, theories of racial/ethnic inequality which neglected sexism among men of color and, predictably, as a corrective to Marxism 's



References: Andersen, Margaret L. and Patricia Hill Collins. 1995. Race, Class, and Gender. An anthology. Second edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Barnett, Bernice McNair, Rose Brewer and M. Bahati Kuumba, 1999. "New Directions in Race, Gender & Class Studies: African American Experiences." Race, Gender & Class, 6, 2, 7-28. Belkhir, Jean. 1994. "The 'Failure ' and Revival of Marxism on Race, Gender & Class Issues." Race, Sex & Class. 2 1, 79-107. --------. 1993. "Editor 's Introduction: Integrating Race, Sex & Class in Our disciplines." Race, Sex & Class. 1 1, 3-11. Berberoglu, Berch. 1994. "Class, Race & Gender: The Triangle of Oppression." Race, Sex & Class, 2, 1, 69-77. Gorelick, Sherry. 1996. "Contradictions of feminist methodology," in Esther Ngan-Ling Chow, D. Wilkinson and M. Baca Zinn, eds., Race, Class & Gender. Common bonds, Different Voices. Thousand Oaks/London/Dehli: Sage Publications. Collins, Patricia Hill. 1993. "Toward a New Vision: Race, Class and Gender as Categories of Analysis and Connection." Race, Sex & Class, 1, 1, 25-45. _______, 1997. "On West and Fenstermaker 's 'Doing Difference, '" in Mary Roth Walsh, ed., Women, Men and Gender. Ongoing Debates. New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 73-75. Eagleton, Terry. 1996. The Illusions of Postmodernism. London: Blackwell. Gimenez, Martha E. 1975. "Marxism and Feminism." Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 1, 1, 61-80. _______, 1990. "The Feminization of Poverty: Myth of Reality?" Social Justice, 17, 3, 43-69. Kandal, Terry. 1995. "Gender, Race & Ethnicity: Let 's not Forget Class." Race, Gender & Class. 2, 2, 139-162. Jacobi, Russell. 1973. "The Politics of Subjectivity." New Left Review, 79, 37-49. Marx, Karl. 1994."Theses on Feuerbach." in L. Simon, ed., Karl Marx. Selected Writings. New York: Hackett. ------. 1994. "The German Ideology." in Simon, op. cit. Ossowski, Stanislaw. 1963. Class Structure in the Social Consciousness. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe. Rose, Stephen J. 1992. Social Stratification in the United States: The American Profile Poster Revised and Expanded. New York: New Press. West, Candace and Sarah Fenstermaker. 1997. "Doing Difference," in Mary Roth Walsh, ed., op. cit., 58-72. Wright, Erik. O. 1978. Class, Crisis and the State. London: Verso.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Manrsios, Gregory. "Class in America-2003": The Social Construction of Gender." Trans. Paula S. Rothenberg. Race, Class, and Gender in the United State. 6th ed. New York: Worth Publishers, 2004. 193-207.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Rothenberg, P. (2007). Race, Class, and Gender in the United States: 6th Edition. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    palace walk

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Miller J., Rothenberg, P. (1998) Domination and Subordination; Race, Class and Gender in the United States; An integrated Study, New York, St. Martin’s Press.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This book was intended for under-graduate and graduate sociology or political science students. The purpose of chapter one was to explain the point of the book. It was an expository introduction that told why race, class, and gender needs to be examined and studied. According to this book race, class, and gender “shape the experiences of all people in the United States.”…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The myths Mantsios describes come from false perceptions that the average citizen does not choose to challenge. These ideas are popular and hardly questioned. Social classes today are recognized as being somewhat old fashioned or a thing of the past. However, does this idea still hold true? Mantsios points out facts taken from studies that show the exact opposite. According to Mantsios, America has the largest distance in income level distribution compared to any other industrialized nation (308). He states, “Sixty percent of the American population holds less than 6 percent of the nation’s wealth” (308). He uses these two statistics, as well as many others, to make it difficult to argue that classes don’t exist.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Bigler, R., Arthur, A., Hughes, J., & Patterson, M. (2008). The politics of race and gender:…

    • 4532 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Argued by Roxana Ng that Ethnicity/race, gender, and class must be treated as social relations which have to do with how people relate to each other through productive and reproductive activities (230). By analyzing the Canadian immigration history it is obvious that men and women and various races were treated differently. As a proof for this argument historical evidences are available. For instance, “Chinese men were not allowed to bring their wives and families to Canada so they could not propagate and spread the yellow menace” (Ng, 234). It is important to know the definitions regarding ethnicity and race are social constructions that shift constantly, reflecting the changing dynamics of gender, race and class relations over time, throughout her paper (Ng, 227). Further on the changing dynamics of race, class and gender as stated “gender, race/ethnicity, and class are not fixed entities. They are socially constructed in and through productive and reproductive relations in which we all participate” (239). Wisely speaking, Ng is arguing in the right direction because by comparing the social construction of Canada today to early 1900s, we can analyze that there have been significant shifts in the definitions and individual’s views regarding race/ethnicity, class, and gender. As an illustration, in…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rothenberg, Paula S. Race, Class, and Gender in the United States. 6th edition. New York, NY: Worth Publishers, 2001.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Steinberg, Steven. The Ethnic Myth: Race, Ethnicity, and Class in America. Boston: Beacon Press, 1978. Print.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hyphenated Americans

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages

    References: Steinberg, Stephen. The Ethnic Myth: Race, Ethnicity and Class in America. January 16, 2001. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.…

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traditional Gender Roles

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Richard T. Schaefer. “Social Construction of Gender”. Sociology 11th Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1983-2008. 298-99…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Music and Racism

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Bloch, A., & Solomos, J. (2010). Race and ethnicity in the 21st century. (p. 69). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Racial Segregation

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: 1 Schaeffer, Richard T. Race and Ethnicity in the United States. 4th ed. Upper…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PHL 612: Philosophy of Law

    • 5890 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, editors. 1999. Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge. Second Edition. Temple University Press. Available through Ryerson University Library; Call Number: KF4755 .C75 2000…

    • 5890 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The poor will always be with us”. This statement may seem to be pessimistic, but it actually can refer to two sociological predictions. The first is that the absolute condition of individuals will never improve such that there is virtually no one who, by no choice of their own, lives a lifestyle that is not acceptable. While the definition of “poverty” might change based on one 's perspective and on relative conditions, a reasonable definition would be lacking sufficient shelter, food, potable water, medical care to maintain one 's health, capability to take care of one 's child, better transportation to one 's place of work and to one 's residence, and education. If all but a tiny minority, so small as to sociologically and statistically insignificant, could afford all of these things, then poverty would be over. The second is that inequality will always occur. Unless a society absolutely affixed wages or resources so each person was absolutely equal in how they were paid, material inequality will always be a factor. Indeed, there are good reasons to have inequality of condition, as it allows for choice. But it is absolutely not the case that all societies would have to be so unequal that there is a class of individuals with markedly and consistently more or less power, wealth and influence. Thus, it is clear that “The poor will always be with us” is actually a complex sociological puzzle, and that the statement is not exactly correct.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays